Log relationship between thickness of material and sound absorbed?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the logarithmic relationship between the thickness of PVC foam and the amount of sound energy absorbed. The experiment utilized the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law, derived from Stokes' law, to analyze sound absorption characteristics. The hypothesis posits that as sound waves travel through thicker materials, the likelihood of energy conversion decreases, leading to exponential energy loss per unit length. The inverse of exponentiation, which is logarithm, is also queried in relation to this phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law
  • Familiarity with Stokes' law in acoustics
  • Knowledge of sound wave propagation and energy conversion
  • Basic principles of logarithmic functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law in detail
  • Explore Stokes' law and its applications in acoustics
  • Study the principles of sound wave propagation through various materials
  • Learn about logarithmic functions and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Acoustic engineers, material scientists, and anyone interested in sound absorption properties of materials will benefit from this discussion.

Marcogoodie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I did an experiement, and found a logarithmic relationship between sound energy absorbed and the amount of mateiral it propagates through. Why is there a logarithmic relationship between the thickness of material and sound absorbed by it?
So I have done an experiment on the amount of sound energy absorbed based on thickness of pvc foam, and found a logarithmic relationship between the two. I've used the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law, which is derived from stokes' law.

Frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_attenuation#Power-law frequency-dependent_acoustic_attenuation

My hypothesis is that as sound waves propagate through material, initially, it can bump into more particles and sound waves can be converted into other forms of energy easily, but as the amount of waves decrease when it propagates through thicker material, the chances of it being converted into other forms of energy decrease. Is that correct?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy loss, per unit length, is proportional to the energy propagating.
So the energy is reducing exponentially as it propagates.
What is the inverse of exponentiation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Marcogoodie and SammyS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K