B Log relationship between thickness of material and sound absorbed?

AI Thread Summary
An experiment on PVC foam revealed a logarithmic relationship between material thickness and sound absorption. The researcher applied the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law, suggesting that sound waves encounter more particles in thinner materials, leading to higher energy conversion. As thickness increases, the likelihood of energy conversion decreases, resulting in reduced sound absorption. The discussion also touches on the exponential reduction of energy as sound propagates through materials. Understanding these principles can enhance acoustic material design and applications.
Marcogoodie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I did an experiement, and found a logarithmic relationship between sound energy absorbed and the amount of mateiral it propagates through. Why is there a logarithmic relationship between the thickness of material and sound absorbed by it?
So I have done an experiment on the amount of sound energy absorbed based on thickness of pvc foam, and found a logarithmic relationship between the two. I've used the frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law, which is derived from stokes' law.

Frequency-dependent acoustic attenuation power law:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_attenuation#Power-law frequency-dependent_acoustic_attenuation

My hypothesis is that as sound waves propagate through material, initially, it can bump into more particles and sound waves can be converted into other forms of energy easily, but as the amount of waves decrease when it propagates through thicker material, the chances of it being converted into other forms of energy decrease. Is that correct?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy loss, per unit length, is proportional to the energy propagating.
So the energy is reducing exponentially as it propagates.
What is the inverse of exponentiation?
 
  • Like
Likes Marcogoodie and SammyS
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top