I Longest day of the year is June 21 but longest daylight is June 26?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter gary350
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The longest day of the year occurs on June 21 or 22, but the longest amount of sunlight can extend to June 26 due to factors like the Earth's elliptical orbit and axial tilt. This discrepancy arises because the June solstice marks a specific point in Earth's orbit, while the duration of daylight is influenced by atmospheric refraction and the timing of sunrise and sunset. The equation of time further complicates this, especially for locations near the tropics, where sunrise and sunset times change rapidly. The visibility of sunlight before sunrise and after sunset also contributes to the difference in perceived day length. Understanding these astronomical principles clarifies why the longest day and the longest daylight do not coincide.
gary350
Messages
276
Reaction score
75
TL;DR Summary
Longest day of the year is June 21 but longest daylight is June 26 ?????
I was reading a NASA web side where I can find angle of the sun and day length at my zip code. Longest day of the year is June 21 for 2 years then June 22 for 2 years, after leap year, longest day is June 21 again for 2 years. I already knew that. Then I see something I never saw before. If longest day is June 21 the longest amount of sunlight is 5 days later June 26. HOW is that possible? Is that a typing error? How can the longest day sun rise to sun set not be the longest amount of sunlight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"longest day"(northern hemisphere) and "most sunlight"(entire planet) are unrelated events. One is a result of axial tilt, the other the elliptical orbit around the Sun. [edit: and perihelion is in January so that's not it... @OP got a link ?]
 
Last edited:
Daylight arrives before sunrise and lasts after sunset.
 
There are many reasons why things are not as simple as they could be.

The date of the June solstice is an instant in the orbit of the Earth about the Sun, it usually falls on June 21 or 22, but for people in local time zones near the dateline it can be just outside that window.

The orbit of the Earth is slightly elliptical, and the solstices and equinoxes are defined by the Earth crossing 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° directions from the Sun to the vernal equinox reference direction, the line where the ecliptic intersects the celestial equator.

Sunrise and sunset are defined by any limb of the Sun being seen above the horizon. The Sun is half a degree across, and it takes four minutes for the Earth to rotate one degree, so the Sun rises on average 1 minute earlier and sets one minute later. The days must average at least 2 minutes longer than the nights. Refraction of sunlight from over the horizon, by the density variation of the atmosphere, increases the visibility, so can extend that longer day significantly.

The equation of time, shows that unexpected things can happen if your zip code is near the tropics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time
Near the solstice, the time of sunrise, and of sunset, are changing at the greatest rate, but in the same direction. That makes it interesting, if you estimate day length based only on either the time of sunrise or sunset.

So it depends on the exact wording of the statement, and your zip code, as to why there is a difference in the longest day and the solstice.
 
gary350 said:
TL;DR Summary: Longest day of the year is June 21 but longest daylight is June 26 ?????

I was reading a NASA web side where I can find angle of the sun and day length at my zip code.
Please reference the exact source so we can all view it!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top