I Longitudinal DIS Structure functions

Click For Summary
DIS observables are defined through structure functions F1, F2, and FL, with the relation FL = F2 - 2xF1. The expressions for FL, F1, and F2 involve integrals over coefficient functions C and parton distribution functions f. The analysis shows that the longitudinal coefficient function CL is influenced by the hadronic variable x, in addition to y and Q. This raises the question of whether CL can be derived from the known coefficient functions for F1 and F2. Understanding the dependence of CL on x is crucial for further analysis of DIS structure functions.
CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
DIS observables can be expressed in terms of structure functions F1, F2 and FL. There exists the relation ##F_L = F_2 - 2xF_1##.

We can write $$ F_L = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} C_{a,L}(y,Q) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q) $$ and similarly for ##F_1## and ##F_2##:

$$ F_1 = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} C_{a,1}(y,Q) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q) $$

$$ F_2 = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} C_{a,2}(y,Q) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q) $$

Then ##F_L = F_2 - 2xF_1## means that also

$$F_L = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} \left( C_{a,2}(y,Q) - 2x C_{a,1}(y,Q) \right) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q). $$

Comparing this with above eqn for ##F_L## means that ##C_{a,L}## is not just a function of y and Q. Is it possible to extract the longitudinal coefficient function for ##F_L## from knowledge of the coefficient function for ##F_1## and ##F_2##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell it really depends on what the function f_a's and constants C_{a,i}'s are, to tell if C_{a,L} depends on x.
 
CAF123 said:
DIS observables can be expressed in terms of structure functions F1, F2 and FL. There exists the relation ##F_L = F_2 - 2xF_1##.

We can write $$ F_L = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} C_{a,L}(y,Q) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q) $$ and similarly for ##F_1## and ##F_2##:

$$ F_1 = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} C_{a,1}(y,Q) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q) $$

$$ F_2 = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} C_{a,2}(y,Q) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q) $$

Then ##F_L = F_2 - 2xF_1## means that also

$$F_L = \sum_a x \int_x^1 \frac{dy}{y} \left( C_{a,2}(y,Q) - 2x C_{a,1}(y,Q) \right) f_a (\frac{x}{y},Q). $$

Comparing this with above eqn for ##F_L## means that ##C_{a,L}## is not just a function of y and Q. Is it possible to extract the longitudinal coefficient function for ##F_L## from knowledge of the coefficient function for ##F_1## and ##F_2##?
You write the relation for ##C_L## there, which depends also on the hadronic variable ##x## (in addition to ##y## and ##Q^2##).

Maybe it would make sense to write: ##C_L(x,Q,y)##
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
497
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
672
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K