MHB Looking for a good analytic geometry book

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for a comprehensive analytic geometry book that delves into interesting curves like lemniscates and cardioids, beyond the basic middle/high school level. The original poster expresses frustration with the lack of accessible resources that cover these topics in detail without requiring advanced mathematical prerequisites. Suggestions include older texts, such as "College Algebra And Trigonometry" by Bryant et al., and a recommendation for the 2003 Prentice-Hall book by Bass et al. While some geometry books provide additional insights, they may not fully meet the poster's desire for a focused study on analytic geometry. Overall, the conversation highlights a gap in available literature for those seeking a deeper understanding of analytic geometry at an intermediate level.
Ragnarok7
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I am always entranced when I read in calculus books about various curves like lemniscates, cardioids, the spiral of Archimedes, the witch of Agnesi, and similar things. But in calculus books they are generally just little asides or relegated to the exercises. Presumably there is more to analytic geometry than just these things, but I have trouble finding anything above the level of basic middle/high school coordinate geometry but below the level of an advanced undergraduate text requiring modern algebra and analysis and whatnot.

Does anyone know of a good book covering such topics and other such interesting things? It seems like in previous centuries these things were studied a lot more, and now no one is very interested at the elementary level. I would like to study plane and solid Euclidean geometry analytically (i.e. not through constructions) on its own, and not wrapped up with some more important subject, and not as only a special case of some very general and complicated theory. I.e., I would like what is taught in high schools/college as analytic geometry, but in much more detail. Does such a thing exist?

Thank you for any suggestions/corrections of my misconceptions!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe, for the Analytic Geometry and some (slightly unusual ) curves graphs. My own copy is now physically ruined and so checking the instructive text inside is nearly impossible, but there was a book from about 1977, College Algebra And Trigonometry, second edition, by Bryant, Karush, Nower, & Saltz, ISBN 0-87620-171-0. I would ordinarily recommend other, and probably better-known Pre-Calculus books but which may not exactly have the content you asked about. (Some authors to watch for are Larson & Hostetler; and Aufman, Barker, & Nation).

I wish I knew better what to tell you about Solid Geometry. Some GOOD Geometry books (like for community colleges and high schools) will give some instruction just as way to make their instruction more thorough; but maybe not a fully as you are asking. The Prentiss-Hall book by Bass et. al. called Geometry (from about year 2003) was an excellent book.

(Yours was an old, unanswered question from year 2014. Maybe others are interested in the same question today.)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top