MHB Looking for a good analytic geometry book

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the search for a comprehensive analytic geometry book that delves into interesting curves like lemniscates and cardioids, beyond the basic middle/high school level. The original poster expresses frustration with the lack of accessible resources that cover these topics in detail without requiring advanced mathematical prerequisites. Suggestions include older texts, such as "College Algebra And Trigonometry" by Bryant et al., and a recommendation for the 2003 Prentice-Hall book by Bass et al. While some geometry books provide additional insights, they may not fully meet the poster's desire for a focused study on analytic geometry. Overall, the conversation highlights a gap in available literature for those seeking a deeper understanding of analytic geometry at an intermediate level.
Ragnarok7
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I am always entranced when I read in calculus books about various curves like lemniscates, cardioids, the spiral of Archimedes, the witch of Agnesi, and similar things. But in calculus books they are generally just little asides or relegated to the exercises. Presumably there is more to analytic geometry than just these things, but I have trouble finding anything above the level of basic middle/high school coordinate geometry but below the level of an advanced undergraduate text requiring modern algebra and analysis and whatnot.

Does anyone know of a good book covering such topics and other such interesting things? It seems like in previous centuries these things were studied a lot more, and now no one is very interested at the elementary level. I would like to study plane and solid Euclidean geometry analytically (i.e. not through constructions) on its own, and not wrapped up with some more important subject, and not as only a special case of some very general and complicated theory. I.e., I would like what is taught in high schools/college as analytic geometry, but in much more detail. Does such a thing exist?

Thank you for any suggestions/corrections of my misconceptions!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe, for the Analytic Geometry and some (slightly unusual ) curves graphs. My own copy is now physically ruined and so checking the instructive text inside is nearly impossible, but there was a book from about 1977, College Algebra And Trigonometry, second edition, by Bryant, Karush, Nower, & Saltz, ISBN 0-87620-171-0. I would ordinarily recommend other, and probably better-known Pre-Calculus books but which may not exactly have the content you asked about. (Some authors to watch for are Larson & Hostetler; and Aufman, Barker, & Nation).

I wish I knew better what to tell you about Solid Geometry. Some GOOD Geometry books (like for community colleges and high schools) will give some instruction just as way to make their instruction more thorough; but maybe not a fully as you are asking. The Prentiss-Hall book by Bass et. al. called Geometry (from about year 2003) was an excellent book.

(Yours was an old, unanswered question from year 2014. Maybe others are interested in the same question today.)
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K