MHB Looking for a new Lie Algebra text

topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
Right now I'm using "Affine Lie Algebras and Quantum Groups" by Fuchs. I'm getting sick of it. As a Physicist the structure and focus of the text is attractive to me. But, to give one example...

The text constructs two vector spaces: L and Lw. Lw is dual to L. The text goes on to state that [math]L \subset Lw[/math]. As the two spaces are dual this cannot be.

BUT: The next paragraph shows how to interpret this. We can (apparently) define a metric between the two spaces and if we use the metric to compare the space dual to L to Lw then we find that L is a subspace of Lw which given the definitions of both spaces is a completely banal comment and isn't actually needed.

I can't take this kind of presentation any more!

Does anyone know of a decent Lie algebra text? I would appreciate with a Physics bent, but that isn't necessary.

Thanks!

-Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
About a year ago, I posted recommendations for books on lie groups/lie algebras http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/looking-online-algebra-resource-12409.html#post59081. Have you taken a look at any of the two? If you're not satisfied with those two then I can give you some more recommendations.
 
Euge said:
About a year ago, I posted recommendations for books on lie groups/lie algebras http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/looking-online-algebra-resource-12409.html#post59081. Have you taken a look at any of the two? If you're not satisfied with those two then I can give you some more recommendations.
Gah! I forgot I did that. Sorry!

I'll take a fresh look at the list. Thanks!

-Dan
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K