MHB Looking for a new Lie Algebra text

topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
Right now I'm using "Affine Lie Algebras and Quantum Groups" by Fuchs. I'm getting sick of it. As a Physicist the structure and focus of the text is attractive to me. But, to give one example...

The text constructs two vector spaces: L and Lw. Lw is dual to L. The text goes on to state that [math]L \subset Lw[/math]. As the two spaces are dual this cannot be.

BUT: The next paragraph shows how to interpret this. We can (apparently) define a metric between the two spaces and if we use the metric to compare the space dual to L to Lw then we find that L is a subspace of Lw which given the definitions of both spaces is a completely banal comment and isn't actually needed.

I can't take this kind of presentation any more!

Does anyone know of a decent Lie algebra text? I would appreciate with a Physics bent, but that isn't necessary.

Thanks!

-Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
About a year ago, I posted recommendations for books on lie groups/lie algebras http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/looking-online-algebra-resource-12409.html#post59081. Have you taken a look at any of the two? If you're not satisfied with those two then I can give you some more recommendations.
 
Euge said:
About a year ago, I posted recommendations for books on lie groups/lie algebras http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/looking-online-algebra-resource-12409.html#post59081. Have you taken a look at any of the two? If you're not satisfied with those two then I can give you some more recommendations.
Gah! I forgot I did that. Sorry!

I'll take a fresh look at the list. Thanks!

-Dan
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top