Looking for a specific math notation

  • Thread starter Thread starter iScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Specific
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
I'm trying to write a contracted general equation for an expandable equation. Just like there's the summation symbol for sums, is there something for multiplying terms?

for example.. how do i contract the following?

$$C_{i}C_{ii}C_{iii}C_{iv}C_{v}...$$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
iScience said:
I'm trying to write a contracted general equation for an expandable equation. Just like there's the summation symbol for sums, is there something for multiplying terms?

for example.. how do i contract the following?

$$C_{i}C_{ii}C_{iii}C_{iv}C_{v}...$$?
Similar to the symbol used for summations (upper-case sigma), there's another symbol that is used for products (upper-case pi).
$$\prod_{i = 1}^n C_i $$
This would be a product with a finite number (n) of factors.

If you meant this to be an infinite product, it would be
$$\prod_{i = 1}^{\infty} C_i $$

BTW, people generally don't use Roman numerals for indexes in mathematics expressions. What you wrote would usually be written as C1C2C3...
 
ah okay, thanks a lot mark44!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top