Looking for General solution for a difference equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the difference equation defined as At+1=(At+r)/(At+r+1) and its manipulation into a more manageable form. Participants explore the difficulty of finding a general solution, suggesting methods such as deriving A2 in terms of A1 and using Taylor series for asymptotic behavior analysis. The conversation highlights that while specific solutions can be derived, a general solution remains elusive, particularly as the sequence approaches equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of difference equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansion techniques
  • Knowledge of asymptotic analysis in mathematical sequences
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for solving nonlinear difference equations
  • Study Taylor series and their applications in approximating functions
  • Explore the concept of equilibrium in mathematical sequences
  • Investigate periodic continued fractions and their relevance to difference equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying difference equations, and researchers interested in nonlinear dynamics and asymptotic behavior analysis.

ivyhawk
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
At+1=(At+r)/(At+r+1)

A1=constant

I know I can set At+1=At=A and solve for a special solution.

What would be a general solution?

I am not taking a course in Difference Equation, and this is not my homework but I encounter a similar question and I reduce it to this form.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Or One step further, how to solve this one?

(1+r)A_t+1-A_t+A_t+1*A_t=r

A_t means A with t subsciptI don't think it is as easy as it looks.
 
Last edited:
ivyhawk said:
I don't think it is as easy as it looks.

It doesn't even look like anything. :-p

Is your second one meant to be

(1+r)At+1-At+At+1*At=r ?
 
epenguin said:
It doesn't even look like anything. :-p

Is your second one meant to be

(1+r)At+1-At+At+1*At=r ?

Yes That is what I mean. And it is just algebra manipulation of the original equation
 
Your starting form is

A_{t+1} = \frac{A_t + r}{A_t + r + 1},
which is perhaps more convenient to write as

A_{t+1} = 1 - \frac{1}{A_t+r+1}

What you could to do try to solve it is find A_2 in terms of A_1, plug that into A_3 to get it in terms of A_1, and so on, to see if you can guess what A_t for general t will look like. (I don't know if this one will turn out nice. I did the first couple of steps myself, and it looks like you may want to look into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continued_fraction (go to the page on periodic continued fractions too). There may be nice solutions for specific values of r or A_1. (Of course, A_1 will be irrelevant as t -> infinity)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Specific solution for A_t is easy to solve

Set A_t=A=A_t+1

We can solve that r=A/(1-A) or the other way, A=(1/2)(-r+(-)(r^2+4r)^1/2

But I still find it very hard to find a general solution.
 
A general solution is hard to find.
But you can get some idea about the asymptotic behaviour when the sequence is approaching equilibrium A.

So assume your solution is

A_{k}=A+p_{k}

Where the sequence p goes to zero as k increases. At the limit of large k, you can expand the RHS to a taylor series. Because we want a linear easy solution, we will only care about the first order. So:

A+p_{k+1}=1-\frac{1}{A+r+1}\frac{1}{1+\frac{p_{k}}{A+r+1}}=1-\frac{1}{A+r+1}(1-\frac{p_{k}}{A+r+1})

Let A+r+1=b to make it look nicer. Also 1-1/b=A. So:

A+p_{k+1}=A+(1-A)^{2}p_{k}

Or

p_{k+1}-(1-A)^{2}p_{k}=0

So at large k's, the series will be:

A_{k}=A+(1-A)^{2k}

This will be a real approximation only if abs(1-A)<1 (the solution is really stable), and that depends on what value of A you have chose, and what is r.
 
How did u expand it?


elibj123 said:
A general solution is hard to find.
But you can get some idea about the asymptotic behaviour when the sequence is approaching equilibrium A.

So assume your solution is

A_{k}=A+p_{k}

Where the sequence p goes to zero as k increases. At the limit of large k, you can expand the RHS to a taylor series. Because we want a linear easy solution, we will only care about the first order. So:

A+p_{k+1}=1-\frac{1}{A+r+1}\frac{1}{1+\frac{p_{k}}{A+r+1}}=1-\frac{1}{A+r+1}(1-\frac{p_{k}}{A+r+1})

Let A+r+1=b to make it look nicer. Also 1-1/b=A. So:

A+p_{k+1}=A+(1-A)^{2}p_{k}

Or

p_{k+1}-(1-A)^{2}p_{k}=0

So at large k's, the series will be:

A_{k}=A+(1-A)^{2k}

This will be a real approximation only if abs(1-A)<1 (the solution is really stable), and that depends on what value of A you have chose, and what is r.
 
This is a geometrical series:

\frac{1}{1-q}=1+q+q^{2}+q^{3}+...

setting q-> (-q) the terms will occur with alternating signs so the linear approximation will be

\frac{1}{1+q}=1-q
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K