Looking for proof that a free rigid body will rotate about its CM

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A free rigid body subjected to a torque-producing force will exhibit two primary behaviors: the center of mass (CM) will move in a straight line, and the body will rotate about an axis through its CM. This behavior is derived from the conservation of total linear momentum and can be mathematically expressed using vector coordinates. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding both linear and angular motion principles, particularly in the context of external forces and their effects on a rigid body's dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of angular momentum and torque concepts
  • Basic principles of rigid body dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Newton's second law for rotation
  • Explore the conservation of angular momentum in rigid body dynamics
  • Learn about Noether's theorem and its implications in mechanics
  • Review textbooks on classical mechanics, focusing on rigid body motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics who are interested in the dynamics of rigid bodies and the principles governing their motion.

scoomer
Messages
18
Reaction score
4
Can anyone recommend a textbook or web paper that proves that, in general, a free rigid body will act in the following way when the body is subjected to a force (or impulse) that is torque producing:
a) The center of mass (CM) moves in a straight line.
b) The body rotates about an axis through its CM.
(By "free" I mean unconstrained.)

It seems intuitive and many textbooks state the above. But the ones I've looked at don't seem to present a proof.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scoomer said:
Can anyone recommend a textbook or web paper that proves that, in general, a free rigid body will act in the following way when the body is subjected to a force (or impulse) that is torque producing:
a) The center of mass (CM) moves in a straight line.
b) The body rotates about an axis through its CM.
(By "free" I mean unconstrained.)
It follows from the conservation of total linear momentum, if you consider that the body consist of many small masses, each with it's own linear momentum. I don't have a formal proof, but that is the line it would along.
 
I also missed this very important concepts from mechanics books. So I worked it out by myself. I define coordinates (all relevant coordinates are vectors):
r_i=r_c+r_i'
v_i=v_c+v_i'=v_c+\omega\times r_i'
I suppose it is possible to show that the necessary vector \omega corresponds to the angular velocity about just any axis. I use center of mass coordinates since later I will need \sum m_ir_i'=0.
-----------------------------
Now
\sum F_i=\sum m_ia_i
\sum F_i=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\sum m_iv_i
\sum F_i^\text{ext}=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left((\sum m_i)v_c\right)
F^\text{ext}=Ma_c
On the LHS I used that internal forces cancel F_{ij}=-F_{ji} and on the RHS I used that \sum m_iv_i'=\omega\times\sum m_i r_i'=0. Now you have the linear law of motion.
--------------------------
For the angular part
\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\sum m_ir_i'\times v_i'=\sum m_i r_i'\times a_i'=\sum m_i r_i'\times (a_i-a_c)=\sum r_i'\times F_i=\sum r_i'\times F_i^\text{ext}
The internal forces cancel again since force are along the line of action r_i\times F_{ij}+r_j\times F_{ji}=\Delta r\times F_{ij}=0. So, the torque from external forces about the center of mass is equal to the angular momentum about the center of mass.

With some additional ideas one can show that therefore in the absence of external forces the center of mass velocity and the angular velocity are constant.
 
Last edited:
thank you, that was very helpful
 
Actually my derivation doesn't specifically address the rigid body (so I don't need \omega). It is for a general set of interacting particles.

That's where I believe conservation of angular momentum comes from. At least I haven't met anyone who convincingly can use Noethers theorem, without including lots of hidden assumptions :smile:
 
what?!
has my reply been deleted again..?
anyway... can you please prov the second law of Newton for rotation?
thanks :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K