Loop-and-allied QG bibliography

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bibliography
  • #211
http://arxiv.org/abs/http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0408033
On the counting of black hole states in loop quantum gravity
Authors: Sergei Alexandrov
Comments: 4 pages
Report-no: SPIN-04/09, ITP-UU-04/15

We argue that counting black hole states in loop quantum gravity one should take into account only states with the minimal spin at the horizon

BTW, Alexandrov has posted a reply to Lubos Motl
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=39780&highlight=alexandrov
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #212
meteor said:
BTW, Alexandrov has posted a reply to Lubos Motl
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=39780&highlight=alexandrov

hee hee
Lubos, a Czech, has gotten himself embroiled with a Russian
and has already acheived the level of (East European equivalent to)
racial epithets. The Czechs have cause to remember the Soviet period
to which Lubos refers:

"It seems to me like a person who wants to get the result 1917 apples, but he gets, by an explicit counting, 1991. Well, the remaining 74 are anti-socialist macroapples and they should not be counted, should they? LM"

Meteor thanks so much for the link. Sergei is at Utrecht (where also that
Renate Loll is----simplicial model gravity) and I earlier got the impression of him that he is quite bright, if also somewhat of a maverick (or wild horse). the world is beautiful.
 
  • #213
It's one thing for a moderator or mentor to also be a discussant, as we all are here. It's another to use your technical moderator power to respond to somebody's post before they can respond to yours. It seems to me that LM misuses the moderator powers this way, at least in spirit.
 
  • #214
selfAdjoint said:
It's one thing for a moderator or mentor to also be a discussant, as we all are here. It's another to use your technical moderator power to respond to somebody's post before they can respond to yours. It seems to me that LM misuses the moderator powers this way, at least in spirit.

and his spirit is mean. we know this. Lubos is a viper.
however he is extraordinarily charming and we must cherish him
as we do poisonous flowers

to me, that crack about the 74 anti-socialist macro-apples that should not be counted (well almost) makes up for all the times he has unfairly insulted John Baez (tho JB might not think so)
 
  • #215
oh, I see better now. You mean as a moderator[/b]
all right to be nettlesome in private, but must be the unbiased moderator
you are right
it does demean the office of moderator to be so biased and
to take such advantage.

but after all it is only SPS.

it would drive me crazy if I had to cope with something like that at PF
but the PF moderators (yrslf incl.) are pretty OK thank goodness
 
  • #216
Forget lubos's personality. His posts are full of valuable insights that are difficult to come by for most people here. Anyway, he never commits the crime of pretending to be something he's not, which is more than I can say for some of the people here.
 
  • #217
I guess we can make allowances for some personalites, hey Jeff? :smile: We make them for you? :smile:

Self Adjoint made a interesting point about comments at the same time as the posting. It would appear to me that as a moderator the content is being look at, which I guess is the moderators job, but why not after its posted.

As to our opinons of Lubos's Knowkedge, I do not think anyone is questioning that.

Smolin and those involved in Loop were well aware of what was happening in strings?. It seems that they go hand in hand, and for Smolin, critical summations of where he had been might not of answered, where he would like to go.

I am not putting words in his mouth just pointing out the excellents papers that have come and summation of those other areas of research of theoretical positions.

Susskind and Smolin rebuttal towards each other, is very interesting to me. This kind of particpation under the Edge banner by John Brock request for letters, helps people decide what is going on.
 
  • #218
New paper to consideration:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0408094
Time dependence in Quantum Gravity
Authors: Martin Bojowald, Parampreet Singh, Aureliano Skirzewski
Comments: 33 pages, 17 figures
Report-no: AEI-2004-065, IGPG-04/8-2

The intuitive classical space-time picture breaks down in quantum gravity, which makes a comparison and the development of semiclassical techniques quite complicated. By a variation of the group averaging method to solve constraints one can nevertheless introduce a classical coordinate time into the quantum theory, and use it to investigate the way a semiclassical continuous description emerges from discrete quantum evolution. Applying this technique to test effective classical equations of loop cosmology and their implications for inflation and bounces, we show that the effective semiclassical theory is in good agreement with the quantum description even at short scales.

Plus the follow-up of Alexandrov after some days of reflection
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=300078#post300078
 
Last edited:
  • #219
Sean Carroll was asked a good series of questions about the testing of GR and possible alternatives to the theory, and posted his answers:
http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2004/08/testing-general-relativity.html

The American Physical Society is having a meeting of
the division of Particles and Fields at riverside
(this gives a picture of what High Energy Physics, or Particle Physics,
is doing these days)
http://dpf2004.ucr.edu/program.html

a fair number of the talks were on astronomy, cosmology, astrophysics topics, you can see by running down the list of plenary talks

Sean Carroll's overview of cosmology (theory) was today Tuesday 31Aug,
it is online and takes about 4 minutes to download
lots of graphs and other visual data
 
Last edited:
  • #220
Finally, do you think that GR will ultimately prove to be wrong (or incomplete) at some level?

Yes. Everybody (in their right mind) does. GR is a classical theory, fundamentally inconsistent with the quantum world in which we live. At the very least we will have to find a quantum version of GR; more likely, we will have to find some more profound theory that is intrinsically quantum-mechanical and reduces to GR in the appropriate circumstances. If experiments reveal deviations from GR at even the classical level, so much the better.

http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2004/08/testing-general-relativity.html



DA... you think? :laughing:
 
Last edited:
  • #221
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409006
"Semiclassical Quantum Gravity: Statistics of Combinatorial Riemannian Geometries"
Or "How to use statistical geometry to quantify uncertainties"
 
Last edited:
  • #222
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409020
Causal Loop Quantum Gravity and Cosmological Solutions
Authors: Ali Shojai, Fatimah Shojai
Comments: 16 pages, 4 figures

"We shall present here the causal interpretation of canonical quantum gravity in terms of new variables. Then we shall apply it to the minisuperspace of cosmology. A vacuum solution of quantum cosmology is obtained, and the Bohmian trajectory is investigated. At the end a coherent state with matter is considered in the cosmological model. "


Seems like a new interpretation of LQG in terms of Bohmian mechanics.
Hidden variables in LQG?
 
Last edited:
  • #223
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #224
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409045

I've read a bit of the paper, and in a nutshell: in gr-qc/9401028, there were a pair of guys trying to unify LQG with Yang-Mills theory, but there were difficulties. In this new paper, the authors say that they achieve this unification in the Euclidean signature
 
Last edited:
  • #225
Daniele Colosi, Carlo Rovelli
Global particles, local particles
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409054

brief sample from conclusions section:

---quote---

...the distinction between global and local states can therefore be safely neglected in concrete utilizations of QFT. However, the distinction is conceptually important because it bears on three related issues: (i) whether particles are local or global objects in conventional QFT; (ii) the extent to which the quantum field theoretical notion of particle can be extended to general contexts where gravity cannot be neglected; and furthermore, more in general, (iii) whether particles can be viewed as the fundamental reality (the “ontology”) described by QFT. Let us discuss these three issues separately. ...

...Can we base the ontology of QFT on local particles? Yes, but local particle states are very different from global particle states. Global particle states such as the Fock particle states are defined once and for all in the theory, while each finite size detector defines its own bunch of local particle states. Since in general the energy operators of different detectors do not commute ([HR, HR'] nonzero) there is no unique “local particle basis” in the state space of the theory, as there is a unique Fock basis. Therefore, we cannot interpret QFT by giving a single list of objects represented by a unique list of states. In other words, we are in a genuine quantum mechanical situation in which distinct particle numbers are complementary observables. Different bases that diagonalize different HR operators have equal footing. Whether a particle exists or not depends on what I decide to measure. In such a context, there is no reason to select an observable as “more real” than the others.

The world is far more subtle than a bunch of particles that interact.
---end quote---
 
Last edited:
  • #226
Apropos of this Colosi-Rovelli attempt to generalize particles, see today's post on Peter Woit's Not Even Wrong about Grothendiek and his toposes. He generalized the Nullstellenstatz view, which you have explicated so clearly, Marcus, in which the points of a continuum are represented as the prime ideals of the algebra of continuous functions on it. G. represents points of a space X as sheafs over X; a sheaf is a kind of category, and this leads to G.'s definition of topos, which we have had some discussion about in connection with Chris Isham's papers. G. was looking to define the "group of a point", and he actually reached a good definition.

Much of the perceived beauty of string theory is actually the beauty of G. and his generation's work in topology and algebraic geometry, which people like Witten have scarfed up and instantiated in physical models, orbifolds, for example. See the survey of this work by Jacques Cartier which Woit gives a link to.
 
  • #227
I am glad to see the web of connections to this Rovelli-Colosi paper
extended in such a distinguished way.

On another matter, it has always been an impediment and a concern that there is no introductory textbook for LQG.
Alejandro Perez posted this, just today:
Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin Foams
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409061
 
  • #228
Yes I saw Perez's paper. I have only just glanced at it but I am glad to see that he doesn't stint on discussing the quantization problems.
 
  • #229
meteor noticed this short paper by Gambini, Olson, Pullin
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409045
It was posted 10September but didn't get noted at the time.

Unified model of loop quantum gravity and matter
4 pages, dedicated to Michael P. Ryan on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday

"We reconsider the unified model of gravitation and Yang--Mills interactions proposed by Chakraborty and Peldán, in the light of recent formal developments in loop quantum gravity. In particular, we show that one can promote the Hamiltonian constraint of the unified model to a well defined anomaly-free quantum operator using the techniques introduced by Thiemann, at least for the Euclidean theory. The Lorentzian version of the model can be consistently constructed, but at the moment appears to yield a correct weak field theory only under restrictive assumptions, and its quantization appears problematic."
 
Last edited:
  • #231
Franz Hinterleitner
Canonical DSR
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0409087

"For a certain example of a "doubly special relativity theory" the modified space-time Lorentz transformations are obtained from momentum space transformations by using canonical methods. In the sequel an energy-momentum dependent space-time metric is constructed, which is essentially invariant under the modified Lorentz transformations. By associating such a metric to every Planck volume in space and the energy-momentum contained in it, a solution of the problem of macroscopic bodies in doubly special relativity is suggested."

may have a solution to the "Soccer Ball" problem mentioned in several recent papers on multi-special relativity (links in this thread to papers on DSR by Smolin, Kowalski-Glikman, Livine, Girelli, Oriti etc. mentioning this problem of the momentum of macroscopic bodies sometimes called soccer ball problem) I have to go but will get back to this and start a separate thread about this paper if it looks to me like Hinterleitner has made some headway with this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #232
Hi,

There are two upcoming activities related to loop quantum gravity:

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/activities/scientific/PI-WORK-2/index.php

and

http://www.nuclecu.unam.mx/~gravit/EscuelaVI/english.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #233
nonunitary said:
Hi,

There are two upcoming activities related to loop quantum gravity:

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/activities/scientific/PI-WORK-2/index.php

and

http://www.nuclecu.unam.mx/~gravit/EscuelaVI/english.html

Thanks nonunitary! I see there's an interesting lineup of talks at the "Quantum Gravity in the Americas" conference, reflecting people's current research:
---quote from the program---

Workshop on Quantum Gravity in the Americas: Status and future directions
October 29 - 31, 2004

Brunnemann: Volume Operator and Recoupling Theory

Chen: Quantum Liouville Theory and Black Hole

Conrady: Vacuum State for LQG

Dittrich: Status of the Master Constraint Programme

Henson: Consequences of space-time discreteness on wave propagation

Manrique: On the macroscopic limit of vacuum compact QED

Meusburger: Phase space quantization of 2+1 gravity in Chern-Simons formulation

Perrini: Asymptotic safety for quantum gravity

Reyes: Higgs propagation in loop quantum geometry

Singh: Phenomenological aspects of LQC

Terno: Entropy and Entanglement for LQG Black Holes

Willis: Some Obstructions to Spin Networks for Non-Compact Gauge

*

Alfaro: Loop Quantum Gravity and High Energy Cosmic Rays

Bombelli: Coherent and semiclassical states for systems

Corichi: About Semi-Classical Quantum Gravity

Dowker: The `Problem of Time’ in a Sum-Over-Histories framework?

Freidel: Particles in 3d quantum gravity

Husain: Black Hole geometrodynamics revisited

Lewandowski: Black hole entropy

Major: Quantum Geometry Phenomenology: A Discrete Machian Model

Markopoulou: Locality in Quantum Gravity

Morales-Tecotl: Possible phenomenological limits for semi-classical LQG

Oeckl: General boundaries and transition amplitudes in QG

Oriti: Feynman propagator in spin foam QG: causality without time

Perez: Dynamics and Spin Foams in non perturbative QG

Pullin: Semi-discrete solution to the dynamics of LQG

Reisenberger: Canonical GR on null hypersurfaces

Sahlmann: String Theory with LQG methods

Smolin: Physics from Loop Quantum Gravity


Sudarski: Space-time granularity and Lorentz Invariance Violation

Urrutia: Synchrotron radiation in Myers-Pospelov electrodynamics

Winkler: Particles, cosmology and spinfoams

Zapata: Coarse graining in loop quantization

Ashtekar: Quantum geometry and black holes

Baez: Spin foams, 2-vector spaces and categorification

Sorkin: Is a past finite order the inner basis of space-time?


LIST OF POSTERS
Cambiaso: Lorentz symmetry violations: Constraints from ultra-high energy astronomy
Carrion: Wilson loop dynamics without regularization
Cortez: On nonequivalence of representations in QFT
Garcia-Islas
Giesel
Montesinos: Covariant Hamiltonian dynamics
Noui: About the Plebanski action
Vandersloot: A model of loop quantum cosmology and its physical Hilbert space
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/activities/scientific/PI-WORK-2/participants.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #234
Quantum Gravity cataloging at Stanford SLAC/DESY Library

Stanford SLAC Library collaborates with the German organization DESY
on the Spires HEP database which has a lot of physics papers available for keyword search. They have sharpened the focus on Quantum Gravity at Spires. You can see this by comparing how the search engine works for 2003 and 2004.

the main URL is
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/hep/

Quantum Gravity is one of the Spires keyword options, and as of now if you try it for 2004 you get 132 papers. It is not that this is so many, quantity-wise, what impresses me is the quality of the pick (especially as compared with past years)

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=FIND+k+quantum+gravity+and+date+2004&SKIP=0

this gets all the papers on Quantum Gravity that appeared this year that they have cataloged as QG so far. It looks to me to be remarkably complete. the representation of LQG and allied approaches to QG is near total and a real improvement over the same search for 2002 or 2003

The above URL is what you get when you type this into the search engine box:
FIND K QUANTUM GRAVITY AND DATE 2004

K means "keyword", it is fairly self-explanatory and the "help" section is helpful. Spires has other modes of search as well, like by author, and you have the option of filtering the search for highly cited papers

For example this will get any Quantum Gravity paper which appeared in 2003 and which has been cited by 50 or more other papers:
FIND K QUANTUM GRAVITY AND TOPCITE 50+ AND DATE 2003

The result is:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=FIND+K+QUANTUM+GRAVITY+AND+TOPCITE+50%2B+AND+DATE+2003

Another useful feature Spires has is a "top 100" papers list for each year, that ranks papers according to number of citations received.
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/library/topcites/

BTW has anyone besides me listened to Michael Peskin's 8 October talk at Kavli. He was on the panel that came after talks by Steven Weinberg and Frank Wilczek
http://online.itp.ucsb.edu/online/kitp25/
His perspective was in sharp contrast to Weinberg's, as Peskin himself pointed out. Peskin does the annual Spires HEP review.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #235
Best online article about Loop Gravity I've seen so far

It is always hard to find an article about Quantum Gravity written for general audience, that is online.

Smolin's January 2004 Scientific American article was clear and accessible (really good i thought) but not online---required a trip to the library, or for you to have a subscription.

this one by Rovelli is not only good and written for general audience, but free for downloading. It prints out to 5 pages and even mention's Renate Loll's work (computer simulations of evolving geometry, with graphic output). I guess Abhay Ashtekar liked it so he scanned it and put it at his website :smile: for educational use.

http://cgpg.gravity.psu.edu/people/Ashtekar/articles/rovelli03.pdf
 
  • #236
This thread is serving as a surrogate sticky (which I update periodically) for links to useful sources about Loop-and-related quantum gravity research.

the last update was back on page 15 around post #217 and another pass is overdue.

Other people's collections of links:
wolram found this
http://jdc.math.uwo.ca/spin-foams/


Introductions, surveys, books:

Abhay Ashtekar
Gravity and the Quantum
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0410054

Carlo Rovelli's book
Quantum Gravity
http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/rovelli.html
contains introduction, historical and philosophical perspective as well as technical stuff.

Best general audience article available online is probably
Rovelli's November 2003 "Physics World" article which Astekar has
at his website. The title was Loop Quantum Gravity
http://cgpg.gravity.psu.edu/people/Ashtekar/articles/rovelli03.pdf

Another good general audience article (but not available online) is
Lee Smolin's Atoms of Space and Time in the January 2004 issue
of the "Scientific American".

Probably the best introduction for physics students and physicists who are not specialists in QG is by Lee Smolin
An Invitation to Loop Quantum Gravity
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0408048

50-page survey and intro with FAQ for physicists in other fields who want to switch fields and do QG research. Intended for the annual Reviews of Modern Physics. Contains list of unsolved problems to work on. List of main results so far.

Alejandro Perez
Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin Foams
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409061

John Baez gave an introduction and survey at the Dublin GR17 conference, which is available online at Baez site.
"Loop Quantum Gravity, Quantum Geometry and Spin Foams"
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lectures.html#lqg
--------


Ways to find out what's currently happening:

Conferences:
the 29,30,31 October conferences at Perimeter
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/activities/scientific/PI-WORK-2/participants.php

Search engines:

SPIRES search engine
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/hep/
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/library/topcites/
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=FIND+k+quantum+gravity+and+date+2004&SKIP=0
The above URL is what you get when you type this into the search engine box:
FIND K QUANTUM GRAVITY AND DATE 2004
K means "keyword", the "help" section is helpful.

ARXIV search engine

2001:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/find/nucl-ex,...D+spin+foam+AND+doubly+special/0/1/0/2001/0/1
2002:
http://arXiv.org/find/nucl-ex,astro...D+spin+foam+AND+doubly+special/0/1/0/2002/0/1
2003:
http://arXiv.org/find/nucl-ex,astro...D+spin+foam+AND+doubly+special/0/1/0/2003/0/1
Last Twelve Months:
http://arXiv.org/find/nucl-ex,astro...D+spin+foam+AND+doubly+special/0/1/0/past/0/1

John Baez TWF, eg. his TWF #206 reports on the Marseille conference
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week206.html

"In particular, I spend a lot of time giving a very simple nontechnical introduction to the recent work of Ambjorn, Jurkiewicz and Loll in which they seem to get a 4d spacetime to emerge from a discrete quantum model - something that nobody had succeeded in doing before!"

the paper mentioned here is
Ambjorn Jurkiewicz Loll
Emergence of a 4D World from Causal Quantum Gravity
http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0404156

Wave's_Hand_Particle just called attention to the fact that Smolin has
co-authored a followup to this paper

Fotini Markopoulou, Lee Smolin
Gauge fixing in Causal Dynamical Triangulations
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0409057
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #237
PAGE TWO (look back one post for the beginning)
NEWSLETTER: the APS Gravity newsletter

Jorge Pullin's Matters of Gravity
http://arxiv.org./abs/gr-qc/0403051
this is the Spring 2004 issue
the Fall 2004 issue is
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409046
==========
TEXTS:

Besides Rovelli's book there is a recent monograph by Ashtekar and Lewandowski
Background Independent Quantum Gravity: A Status Report
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0404018

and Thiemann's Lecture Notes
(they have been published in by Springer Verlag, Berlin)
Lectures on Loop Quantum Gravity
available online
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0210094

Rovelli's LivingReviews article
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9710008

Rovelli and Upadhya "Primer"
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9806079

Rovelli and Gaul lecture notes from WS-1999
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9910079

========
SURVEY ARTICLES:

A survey of the whole field of approaches to QG
which is interesting partly for historical and broader perspective is
Carlo Rovelli's
Strings, loops and others: a critical survey of the present approaches to quantum gravity
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/9803024
" I illustrate the main achievements and the main difficulties in: string theory, loop quantum gravity, discrete quantum gravity (Regge calculus, dynamical triangulations and simplicial models), Euclidean quantum gravity, perturbative quantum gravity, quantum field theory on curved spacetime, noncommutative geometry, null surfaces, topological quantum field theories and spin foam models..."

another broad survey
Enrique Alvarez
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0405107
Quantum Gravity
( Lectures given at Karpacz. 40 pages)
==============

QG PHENOMENOLOGY:

Efforts and proposals to test QG are of increasing importance.
QG testability (Phenomenology) was the topic of the Winterschool-2004 (WS-2004) symposium this year, 4-14February, at Karpacz.
http://ws2004.ift.uni.wroc.pl/html.html
click on lectures if you want slides from the various talks.
Many of the talks are now written up as journal articles and available
on arxiv----more complete and faster download.

Cambridge Uni Press is publishing "Universe or Multiverse" which will contain a chapter by Smolin called "Scientific Alternatives to the Anthropic Principle" where he offers an evolutionary Multiverse hypothesis that generates testable (numerical) predictions.
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0407213

Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
Planck-scale Lorentz-symmetry test theories
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0410076

====================
EXTENSIONS OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY
Much QG phenomenology focuses on modifications of Lorentz symmentry---connecting quantum gravity with DSR namely "DDSR" or "TSR" ( triply special relativity)

Kowalski-Glikman, Smolin
"Triply Special Relativity"
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0406276

Girelli Livine Oriti
"Deformed Special Relativity as an effective flat limit of quantum gravity"
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0406100

======================
LOOP QUANTUM COSMOLOGY (only a few of the many papers)

meteor recently flagged this one
Martin Bojowald, Parampreet Singh, Aureliano Skirzewski
Time dependence in Quantum Gravity
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0408094

This recent paper has an extensive bibliography with many arxiv links, so
I will refer to that instead of posting them.
Here is the abstract:

"The intuitive classical space-time picture breaks down in quantum gravity, which makes a comparison and the development of semiclassical techniques quite complicated. By a variation of the group averaging method to solve constraints one can nevertheless introduce a classical coordinate time into the quantum theory, and use it to investigate the way a semiclassical continuous description emerges from discrete quantum evolution. Applying this technique to test effective classical equations of loop cosmology and their implications for inflation and bounces, we show that the effective semiclassical theory is in good agreement with the quantum description even at short scales."

Martin Bojowald
Loop Quantum Cosmology: Recent Progress
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0402053

Martin Bojowald
Quantum Gravity and the Big Bang
http://arxiv.org./astro-ph/0309478

Shinji Tsujikawa, Parampreet Singh, Roy Maartens
Loop quantum gravity effects on inflation and the CMB
http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/0311015
from their abstract:
"In loop quantum cosmology, the universe avoids a big bang singularity and undergoes an early kinetic-dominated super-inflation phase, with a quantum-corrected Friedmann equation. As a result, an inflaton field is driven up its potential hill, thus setting the initial conditions for standard inflation. We show that this effect can raise the inflaton high enough to achieve sufficient e-foldings in the standard inflation era. We analyze the cosmological perturbations and show that loop quantum effects can leave a signature on the largest scales in the CMB, with some loss of power and running of the spectral index."

Viqar Husain and Oliver Winkler
On singularity resolution in quantum gravity
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0312094
this is especially interesting because they duplicate LQC results (for example by Bojowald) using an older version of quantum gravity, ADM variables, quantized metric. Shows that the removal of the big bang singularity doesn't depend on using a particular formalism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #238
PAGE THREE OF THE LINKS
Stingray told us about this talk by Ashtekar
http://www.phys.psu.edu/events/index.html?event_id=934;event_type_ids=7;span=2004-08-20.2004-12-25

The talk was given 20 September at Penn State and is called
Black Hole Evaporation and Information Loss: Recent Advances

As you listen to the audio you have to step from one slide to the next
in synch with the talk. In this talk you get a foretaste of two papers by Ashtekar and Bojowald which are not on arxiv yet.

Ashtekar refers to the papers in
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0410054
They are:

Ashtekar A and Bojowald M 2004 Non-Singular Quantum Geometry of the Schwarzschild Black Hole Interior Preprint

Ashtekar A and Bojowald M 2004 Black hole evaporation: A paradigm Preprint

nonunitary provided a link to an article giving the definitions of dynamical horizon and isolated horizon. Ashtekar uses these concepts in his talk
Abhay Ashtekar, Badri Krishnan
Isolated and dynamical horizons and their applications
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0407042

other papers of interest
Gambini Porto Pullin
Realistic clocks, universal decoherence and the black hole information paradox
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0406260

also their earlier
No black hole information puzzle in a relational universe
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0405183

==========================
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #240
Wave's_Hand_Particle said:
Marcus, it may be of interest if you could collate papers that are pertaining to each other, for intstance these appeared a couple of days ago:http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0409057

http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0409056

This is a reply from Smolin-Dreyer-Markopoulou, to the Loll-Ambjorn paper?

Thanks for pointing this out WHP. After I read your post I went back and edited it into post #245, that is 3 or 4 back from here.
The Smolin-Markopoulou hep-th/0409057 is definitely a response to the Ambjorn-Jurkiewicz-Loll paper. it supports the idea that the AJL technique does not single out any particular time coordinate (which would be a weakness in their approach). So it is a friendly corroboration that AJL looks like it is on the right track. However more needs to be done in that direction, as they note. If you see more dynamical triangulations papers please flag them. I'm looking forward to seeing some appear in the next few months.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K