Loop-and-allied QG bibliography

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bibliography
  • #301
the guy is at Austen Texas
I don't know whether this paper by itself is so weighty but it impresses me that stuff keeps piling up about Kodama state

I don't know who Andrew Randono is either, but if the paper holds up, it's path-breaking. He has embedded the existing, problematical Kodama state (proposed as the ground state of quantum gravity, the QG vacuum if you will) in a continuum of such states parametrized by the Immirzi parameter. Since the Baez et. al. path integral paper strongly suggests the I.P. as a little bigger than 1 and real, while existing Kodama has Immirzi = -i, he wants to, well, sort of continue through his new continuum to get to the real value. And when he does this he gets a new kind of Kodama state which is nice. I hope he's right, because it could really simplify things for QG, and might even convert some more string theorists!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #302
selfAdjoint said:
... I hope he's right, because it could really simplify things for QG, and might even convert some more string theorists!

I so much hope he is right too, or that something along those lines can be rigorously established. Bringing in a few more string theorists is a nice idea too :smile:

I should post something about this newly arxived paper by Sorkin:

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0504037
Ten Theses on Black Hole Entropy
Rafael D. Sorkin (Perimeter Institute and Syracuse University)

To appear in the Proceedings of the European Science Foundation Conference on Philosophical and Foundational Issues in Statistical Physics, held Utrecht, the Netherlands, 28-30 November 2003. The proceedings are to be published in a special issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (2005)

"I present a viewpoint on black hole thermodynamics according to which the entropy: derives from horizon "degrees of freedom''; is finite because the deep structure of spacetime is discrete; is "objective'' thanks to the distinguished coarse graining provided by the horizon; and obeys the second law of thermodynamics precisely because the effective dynamics of the exterior region is not unitary."

I wonder what our long-time PF-member whose handle is "nonunitary" thinks of Sorkin's paper. :wink: Also PF-member Edgar1813, whose friends Gambini and Pullin have argued that time-evolution (told with a realistic quantum clock) must be nonunitary. The idea presses in from several directions.
 
  • #303
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504029

Black hole evaporation: A paradigm
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald
18 pages, 4 figures
IGPG04/8-4, AEI-2004-072

"A paradigm describing black hole evaporation in non-perturbative quantum gravity is developed by combining two sets of detailed results: i) resolution of the Schwarzschild singularity in loop quantum gravity; and ii) time-evolution of black holes in the dynamical horizon framework. Quantum geometry effects introduce a major modification in the traditional space-time diagram of black hole evaporation, providing a possible mechanism for recovery of information that is classically lost in the process of black hole formation. The paradigm is developed directly in the Lorentzian regime and necessary conditions for its viability are discussed. If these conditions are met, much of the tension between expectations based on space-time geometry and structure of quantum theory would be resolve."

this is a long-awaited paper. Ashtekar gave a talk at Penn State last year about this (audio and slides are available). the paper has already been cited in some others.
 
  • #304
Ashtekar and Bojowald have another BH paper in preparation called
Non-singular quantum geometry of the Schwarzschild black hole interior

that is reference [1] in their paper that just came out.

in the present paper they discuss the results in [1] somewhat, as in the abstract, and on pages 5 and 7:

abstract: " i) resolution of the Schwarzschild singularity in loop quantum gravity[1]; "

page 5:"Since the key issues involve the final black hole singularity and since we expect this singularity to be generically space-like, one can first focus just on the interior of the Schwarzschild horizon. This region is naturally foliated by 3-manifolds ...Using quantum geometry, we can go to the exact quantum theory [1]. The situation is similar but technically more complicated than that encountered in the rigorous treatment of spatially homogeneous and isotropic cosmologies [16]. (See also [15] where the same kind of representation is used, based on ADM variables.)... "

page 7: "... Thus, as in quantum cosmology, one finds that the quantum evolution does not stop at the singularity; one can evolve right through it [1]. The state remains pure. However, in the deep Planck regime around the singularity, the notion of a classical space-time geometry fails to make even an approximate sense. Nonetheless, since there is no longer a final boundary in the interior, the full quantum evolution is quite different from the classical one..."

page 7: "...This calculation was done [1] in the Kantowski-Sachs mini-superspace and |Psi> represents the state of the Schwarzschild black hole interior in loop quantum gravity. This black hole can not evaporate: there is no matter and because of the restriction to spherical symmetry there can not be Hawking radiation of gravitons either. However, since the generic singularity is expected to be space-like, one may hope that the general intuition about the resolution of the Schwarzschild singularity it provides can be taken over to models in which gravity is coupled to scalar fields, where the evaporation does occur. We will assume that the overall, qualitative features of our singularity resolution will continue to be valid in these models."
 
  • #305
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504043
Quantum Gravitational Collapse
Leonardo Modesto
13 pages

"We apply the recent results in Loop Quantum Cosmology and in the resolution of Black Hole singularity to the gravitational collapse of a star. We study the dynamic of the space time in the interior of the Schwarzschild radius. In particular in our simple model we obtain the evolution of the matter inside the star and of the gravity outside the region where the matter is present. The boundary condition identify an unique time inside and outside the region where the matter is present. We consider a star during the collapse in the particular case in which inside the collapsing star we take null pressure, homogeneity and isotropy. The space-time outside the matter is homogeneous and anisotropic. We show that the space time is singularity free and that we can extend dynamically the space-time beyond the classical singularity."
 
  • #306
If Modesto's paper really new? I thought that LQG implies no singularities had been established for some time. Is the new contribution the description of what is going on inside the black hole?
 
  • #307
here is post #302 on this thread
just out
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503041
A black hole mass threshold from non-singular quantum gravitational collapse
Martin Bojowald, Rituparno Goswami, Roy Maartens, Parampreet Singh
4 pages, 3 figures

"Quantum gravity is expected to remove the classical singularity that arises as the end-state of gravitational collapse. To investigate this, we work with a simple toy model of a collapsing homogeneous scalar field. We show that non-perturbative semi-classical effects of Loop Quantum Gravity cause a bounce and remove the classical black hole singularity. Furthermore, we find a critical threshold scale, below which no horizon forms -- quantum gravity may exclude very small astrophysical black holes."

Bojowald removed the cosmological singularity in 2001, assuming isotropy. The result has since been extended to more general cases---post #301 has a link to a recent review.

Removing the black hole singularity is just happening this year, for the first time.

Just because the cosmological (BB) singularity was cured does not mean that the gravitational collapse (BH) singularity was cured.
In any given case the LQG analysis has to be done to see if the theory breaks down (and makes a singularity) or not. Including matter makes for some additional technical complications
========================
a new paper by Ashtekar was posted Tuesday 12 April
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504052
Semiclassical States for Constrained Systems
Abhay Ashtekar, Luca Bombelli, Alejandro Corichi
25 pages, 3 figures
 
Last edited:
  • #308
short reading list for "LQG explains the constants" thread:

1.these two papers, and the references therein, discuss the removal of the classical BB ex-singularity in a range of cases that has gradually extended the generality of Bojowald's initial 2001 result.

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0402053
Loop Quantum Cosmology: Recent Progress
Martin Bojowald
17 pages, 2 figures, Plenary talk at ICGC 2004

"Aspects of the full theory of loop quantum gravity can be studied in a simpler context by reducing to symmetric models like cosmological ones. This leads to several applications where loop effects play a significant role when one is sensitive to the quantum regime. As a consequence, the structure of and the approach to classical singularities are very different from general relativity: The quantum theory is free of singularities, and there are new phenomenological scenarios for the evolution of the very early universe including inflation. We give an overview of the main effects, focussing on recent results obtained by several different groups."

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503020
The Early Universe in Loop Quantum Cosmology
Martin Bojowald
10 pages, 3 figures, plenary talk at VI Mexican School on Gravitation and Mathematical Physics, Nov 21-27, 2004

"Loop quantum cosmology applies techniques derived for a background independent quantization of general relativity to cosmological situations and draws conclusions for the very early universe. Direct implications for the singularity problem as well as phenomenology in the context of inflation or bouncing universes result, which will be reviewed here. The discussion focuses on recent new results for structure formation and generalizations of the methods."

2. these papers, and references therein, go towards understanding the BH ex-singularity and showing that it evolves into the BB ex-singularity:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503041
A black hole mass threshold from non-singular quantum gravitational collapse
Martin Bojowald, Rituparno Goswami, Roy Maartens, Parampreet Singh
4 pages, 3 figures

"Quantum gravity is expected to remove the classical singularity that arises as the end-state of gravitational collapse. To investigate this, we work with a simple toy model of a collapsing homogeneous scalar field. We show that non-perturbative semi-classical effects of Loop Quantum Gravity cause a bounce and remove the classical black hole singularity. Furthermore, we find a critical threshold scale, below which no horizon forms -- quantum gravity may exclude very small astrophysical black holes."

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504043
Quantum Gravitational Collapse
Leonardo Modesto
13 pages

We apply the recent results in Loop Quantum Cosmology and in the resolution of Black Hole singularity to the gravitational collapse of a star. We study the dynamic of the space time in the interior of the Schwarzschild radius. In particular in our simple model we obtain the evolution of the matter inside the star and of the gravity outside the region where the matter is present. The boundary condition identify an unique time inside and outside the region where the matter is present. We consider a star during the collapse in the particular case in which inside the collapsing star we take null pressure, homogeneity and isotropy. The space-time outside the matter is homogeneous and anisotropic. We show that the space time is singularity free and that we can extend dynamically the space-time beyond the classical singularity."

3. if the models of BH collapse and BB expansion can be joined in theory then one can take seriously the CNS (cosm. nat. selection) hypothesis as a way of understanding why the basic constants in the Standard Models are what they are. The CNS theory can be tested empirically by observation and experiment. This paper discusses CNS:

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0407213
Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle
Lee Smolin
for "Universe or Multiverse", ed. by Bernard Carr et. al., to be published by Cambridge University Press.

It is explained in detail why the Anthropic Principle (AP) cannot yield any falsifiable predictions, and therefore cannot be a part of science. Cases which have been claimed as successful predictions from the AP are shown to be not that. Either they are uncontroversial applications of selection principles in one universe (as in Dicke's argument), or the predictions made do not actually logically depend on any assumption about life or intelligence, but instead depend only on arguments from observed facts (as in the case of arguments by Hoyle and Weinberg). The Principle of Mediocrity is also examined and shown to be unreliable, as arguments for factually true conclusions can easily be modified to lead to false conclusions by reasonable changes in the specification of the ensemble in which we are assumed to be typical.
We show however that it is still possible to make falsifiable predictions from theories of multiverses, if the ensemble predicted has certain properties specified here. An example of such a falsifiable multiverse theory is cosmological natural selection. It is reviewed here and it is argued that the theory remains unfalsified. But it is very vulnerable to falsification by current observations, which shows that it is a scientific theory.
The consequences for recent discussions of the AP in the context of string theory are discussed."
 
Last edited:
  • #309
wolram found this paper and contributed the link:

http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0504059
Geometric spin foams, Yang-Mills theory and background-independent models
Florian Conrady (CPT, Marseille & Potsdam, Max Planck Inst.)
28 pages, 27 diagrams
AEI-2005-090

"We review the dual transformation from pure lattice gauge theory to spin foam models with an emphasis on a geometric viewpoint. This allows us to give a simple dual formulation of SU(N) Yang-Mills theory, where spin foam surfaces are weighted with the exponentiated area. In the case of gravity, we introduce a symmetry condition which demands that the amplitude of an individual spin foam depends only on its geometric properties and not on the lattice on which it is defined. For models that have this property, we define a new sum over abstract spin foams that is independent of any choice of lattice or triangulation. We show that a version of the Barrett-Crane model satisfies our symmetry requirement."

a thread for discussing the paper:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=530764#post530764
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #310
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/9404011
The fate of black hole singularities and the parameters of the standard models of particle physics and cosmology
Lee Smolin
27 pages
CGPG-94/3-5

"A cosmological scenario which explains the values of the parameters of the standard models of elementary particle physics and cosmology is discussed. In this scenario these parameters are set by a process analogous to natural selection which follows naturally from the assumption that the singularities in black holes are removed by quantum effects leading to the creation of new expanding regions of the universe. The suggestion of J. A. Wheeler that the parameters change randomly at such events leads naturally to the conjecture that the parameters have been selected for values that extremize the production of black holes. This leads directly to a prediction, which is that small changes in any of the parameters should lead to a decrease in the number of black holes produced by the universe. On plausible astrophysical assumptions it is found that changes in many of the parameters do lead to a decrease in the number of black holes produced by spiral galaxies. These include the masses of the proton,neutron, electron and neutrino and the weak, strong and electromagnetic coupling constants. Finally,this scenario predicts a natural time scale for cosmology equal to the time over which spiral galaxies maintain appreciable rates of star formation, which is compatible with current observations that Omega = .1-.2."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #311
A recent review article about BH vibration modes (relevant to LQG)
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411025

A critique of Smolin CNS by Rudy Vaas (in his capacity as Philosophy of Science expert) with a good bibliography of other people's reactions to CNS

http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0205119
Is there a Darwinian Evolution of the Cosmos? - Some Comments on Lee Smolin's Theory of the Origin of Universes by Means of Natural Selection
Ruediger Vaas
Comments: 20 pages; extended version of a contribution to the MicroCosmos - MacroCosmos conference in Aachen, Germany, September 2-5 1998; finished in late 1998 and published in the conference proceedings

"For Lee Smolin, our universe is only one in a much larger cosmos (the Multiverse) - a member of a growing community of universes, each one being born in a bounce following the formation of a black hole. In the course of this, the values of the free parameters of the physical laws are reprocessed and slightly changed. This leads to an evolutionary picture of the Multiverse, where universes with more black holes have more descendants. Smolin concludes, that due to this kind of Cosmological Natural Selection our own universe is the way it is. The hospitality for life of our universe is seen as an offshoot of this self-organized process. - This paper outlines Smolin's hypothesis, its strength, weakness and limits, its relationship to the anthropic principle and evolutionary biology, and comments on the hypothesis from different points of view: physics, biology, philosophy of science, philosophy of nature, and metaphysics..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #312
LQC paper by G. M. Hossain

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504125
Large volume quantum correction in loop quantum cosmology: Graviton illusion?
Golam Mortuza Hossain
4 pages
IMSc/2005/04/10

"The leading quantum correction to Einstein-Hilbert Hamiltonian coming from large volume vacuum isotropic loop quantum cosmology, is independent of quantization ambiguity parameters. It is shown here that this correction can be viewed as finite volume gravitational Casimir energy due to one-loop 'graviton' contributions. In vacuum case sub-leading quantum corrections and in non-vacuum case even leading quantum correction depend on ambiguity parameters. It may be recalled that these are in fact analogous features of perturbative quantum gravity where it is well-known that pure gravity (on-shell) is one-loop finite whereas higher-loops contributions are not even renormalizable. These features of the quantum corrections coming from non-perturbative quantization, sheds a new light on a major open issue; how to communicate between non-perturbative and perturbative approaches of quantum gravity."
 
  • #313
The Creation of General Relativity

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504179
Einstein and Hilbert: The Creation of General Relativity
Ivan T. Todorov (Institut fuer Theoretische Physik, Universitaet Goettingen, Germany, and Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Sofia, Bulgaria)
Colloquium talk; 15 pages
Subj-class: History of Physics
"It took eight years after Einstein announced the basic physical ideas behind the relativistic gravity theory before the proper mathematical formulation of general relativity was mastered. The efforts of the greatest physicist and of the greatest mathematician of the time were involved and reached a breathtaking concentration during the last month of the work.
Recent controversy, raised by a much publicized 1997 reading of Hilbert's proof-sheets of his article of November 1915, is also discussed."

knowing something about the history of how Einstein (and David Hilbert who was working along similar lines) arrived at General Relativity, in several ways a completely new kind of physical theory, can be a help in understanding it and even today's efforts to quantize this geometrical theory of gravity. this account draws on a lot of contemporary stuff, letters, quotes, to make an interesting story.

Rovelli's book Quantum Gravity also has much of this history in chapter 2. Rovelli obviously considered it essential to LQG that one get some perspective on GR and the challenge of finding a common ground with QM.

I don't happen to know other online accounts of Einstein's "Long March" to general relativity----what he went through over about 8 years to get there and the help he got from others. If anyone knows of another worthwhile online history of the years 1907-1915 or thereabout, please let us know.
 
Last edited:
  • #314
a long-awaited paper by Lewandowski, Okolow, Sahlmann, Thiemann

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504147
Uniqueness of diffeomorphism invariant states on holonomy-flux algebras
Jerzy Lewandowski, Andrzej Okolow, Hanno Sahlmann, Thomas Thiemann
38 pages, one figure

"Loop quantum gravity is an approach to quantum gravity that starts from the Hamiltonian formulation in terms of a connection and its canonical conjugate. Quantization proceeds in the spirit of Dirac: First one defines an algebra of basic kinematical observables and represents it through operators on a suitable Hilbert space. In a second step, one implements the constraints. The main result of the paper concerns the representation theory of the kinematical algebra: We show that there is only one cyclic representation invariant under spatial diffeomorphisms.
While this result is particularly important for loop quantum gravity, we are rather general: The precise definition of the abstract *-algebra of the basic kinematical observables we give could be used for any theory in which the configuration variable is a connection with a compact structure group. The variables are constructed from the holonomy map and from the fluxes of the momentum conjugate to the connection. The uniqueness result is relevant for any such theory invariant under spatial diffeomorphisms or being a part of a diffeomorphism invariant theory."
 
  • #315
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505002
Absence of the Kasner singularity in the effective dynamics from loop quantum cosmology
Ghanashyam Date
4 pages
IMSc/2005/4/11
"In classical general relativity, the generic approach to the initial singularity is usually understood in terms of the BKL scenario. In this scenario, along with the Bianchi IX model, the exact, singular, Kasner solution of vacuum Bianchi I model also plays a pivotal role. Using an effective classical Hamiltonian obtained from loop quantization of vacuum Bianchi I model, exact solution is obtained which is non-singular due to a discreteness parameter. The solution is parameterized in exactly the same manner as the usual Kasner solution and reduces to the Kasner solution as discreteness parameter is taken to zero. At the effective Hamiltonian level, the avoidance of Kasner singularity uses a mechanism distinct from the `inverse volume' modifications characteristic of loop quantum cosmology."

Ghanashyam Date is a senior relativist at Chennai Institute, who is an LQC expert. he has co-authored with Bojowald. Golam Hossain, several of whose LQC papers we have seen, is the student of Ghanashyam Date. some of Date's previous papers are Genericity of Inflation in LQC and
another one about the absence of cosmological singularity which showed that a bounce was generic in LQC.
 
  • #316
Causal Dynamical Triangulations at Perimeter

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505004
Foliations and 2+1 Causal Dynamical Triangulation Models
Tomasz Konopka
9 pages, 3 figures
"Most models of causal dynamical triangulations construct space-time by arranging a set of simplices in layers separated by a fixed time-like distance. The importance of the foliation structure in the 2+1 dimensional model is studied by considering variations of the model in which this property is relaxed. It turns out that the fixed-lapse condition can be equivalently replaced by a set of global constraints that have geometrical interpretation. On the other hand, the introduction of new types of simplices that puncture the foliating sheets in general leads to different low-energy behavior compared to the original model."

A year ago there was the Marseille conference and Renate Loll delivered the DT paper "Emergence of a 4D World..." which raised a lot of interest in Causal DT. So Smolin and Markopoulou have done a little with DT in less than 4 dimensions, since then, and I guess that Tom Konopka is a grad student or postdoc maybe of Fotini Markopoulou, she said she had someone at perimeter/waterloo who was working on Dynamical Triangulations.
 
  • #317
a new paper by Laurent Freidel

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505016
Group Field Theory: An overview
Laurent Freidel (PI, ENS-Lyon)
10 pages
"We give a brief overview of the properties of a higher dimensional generalization of matrix model which arises naturally in the context of a background independent approach to quantum gravity, the so called group field theory. We show that this theory leads to a natural proposal for the physical scalar product of quantum gravity. We also show in which sense this theory provides a third quantization point of view on quantum gravity."
 
  • #318
new paper by Gambini and Pullin

Gambini and Pullin have a unique approach to quantum gravity, not LQG but able to make contact with LQG in some of its results. There is no Hamiltonian constraint in their approach unlike in LQG, and no "problem of time"

Ashtekar considers G&P "consistent discretization" one of 3 or 4 promising approaches to quantizing General Relativity (particularly as to the dynamics) and evidently he is going to include G&P in the landmark book he is putting together called "100 Years of Relativity".

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505023
Discrete space-time
Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge Pullin
16 pages, submitted to the volume "100 Years of Relativity - Space-time Structure: Einstein and Beyond", A. Ashtekar, ed., to be published by World Scientific.

"We review recent efforts to construct gravitational theories on discrete space-times, usually referred to as the "consistent discretization'' approach. The resulting theories are free of constraints at the canonical level and therefore allow to tackle many problems that cannot be currently addressed in continuum quantum gravity. In particular the theories imply a natural method for resolving the big bang (and other types) of singularities and predict a fundamental mechanism for decoherence of quantum states that might be relevant to the black hole information paradox. At a classical level, the theories may provide an attractive new path for the exploration of issues in numerical relativity. Finally, the theories can make direct contact with several kinematical results of continuum loop quantum gravity. We review in broad terms several of these results and present in detail as an illustration the classical treatment with this technique of the simple yet conceptually challenging model of two oscillators with constant energy sum."
 
Last edited:
  • #319
A growing number of researchers are involved with improved models of BH that don't have the singularity problem. I want to keep the links to their papers handy. here are some of the people:

Abhay Ashtekar, Viqar Husain, Oliver Winkler, Leonardo Modesto, Martin Bojowald, Roy Maartens, Rituparno Goswami, Parampreet Singh,

and here are some of their recent papers:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504029
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503041
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504043
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411032
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0407097
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0412039
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0410125
 
  • #320
marcus said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505002
Absence of the Kasner singularity in the effective dynamics from loop quantum cosmology
Ghanashyam Date
4 pages
IMSc/2005/4/11
... the absence of cosmological singularity which showed that a bounce was generic in LQC.

I just reported a paper by Ghanashyam Date, here is another:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505030
Pre-classical solutions of the vacuum Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology
Ghanashyam Date
Comments: 4 pages, revtex4, no figures
IMSc/2005/4/12
"Loop quantization of diagonalized Bianchi class A models, leads to a partial difference equation as the Hamiltonian constraint at the quantum level. In the absence of an adequate candidate for a physical inner product and/or physical observables, a criterion for testing a viable semiclassical limit has been formulated in terms of existence of the so-called pre-classical solutions. We demonstrate the existence of pre-classical solutions of the quantum equation for the vacuum Bianchi I model. All these solutions avoid the classical singularity at vanishing volume."
=========================
Here is one in Loop Quantum Cosmology by Thiemann, a new field for him.

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505032
On (Cosmological) Singularity Avoidance in Loop Quantum Gravity
Johannes Brunnemann, Thomas Thiemann
34 pages, 16 figures
AEI-2005-098

"Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC), mainly due to Bojowald, is not the cosmological sector of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). Rather, LQC consists of a truncation of the phase space of classical General Relativity to spatially homogeneous situations which is then quantized by the methods of LQG. Thus, LQC is a quantum mechanical toy model (finite number of degrees of freedom) for LQG(a genuine QFT with an infinite number of degrees of freedom) which provides important consistency checks. However, it is a non trivial question whether the predictions of LQC are robust after switching on the inhomogeneous fluctuations present in full LQG. Two of the most spectacular findings of LQC are that 1. the inverse scale factor is bounded from above on zero volume eigenstates which hints at the avoidance of the local curvature singularity and 2. that the Quantum Einstein Equations are non -- singular which hints at the avoidance of the global initial singularity. We display the result of a calculation for LQG which proves that the (analogon of the) inverse scale factor, while densely defined, is {\it not} bounded from above on zero volume eigenstates. Thus, in full LQG, if curvature singularity avoidance is realized, then not in this simple way. In fact, it turns out that the boundedness of the inverse scale factor is neither necessary nor sufficient for curvature singularity avoidance and that non -- singular evolution equations are neither necessary nor sufficient for initial singularity avoidance because none of these criteria are formulated in terms of observable quantities.After outlining what would be required, we present the results of a calculation for LQG which could be a first indication that our criteria at least for curvature singularity avoidance are satisfied in LQG."

this is a companion, or auxilliary paper by the same authors:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505033
Unboundedness of Triad -- Like Operators in Loop Quantum Gravity
Johannes Brunnemann, Thomas Thiemann
57 pages, 19 figures
AEI-2005-099
"In this paper we deliver the proofs for the claims, made in a companion paper, concerning the avoidance of cosmological curvature singularities in in full Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG)."
 
Last edited:
  • #321
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505069
Knot theory and a physical state of quantum gravity
Tomas Liko, Louis H. Kauffman
37 pages, 4 figures; review paper; comments/suggestions welcome

"We discuss the theory of knots, and describe how knot invariants arise naturally in theoretical physics. The focus of this review is to delineate the relationship between topological field theory and conformal field theory at both the classical and quantum levels, and to describe in detail the loop representation of non-perturbative canonical quantum general relativity (loop quantum gravity). This leads naturally to a discussion of the Kodama wavefunction, and a framing of the loop observables. The latter may be important for a background-independent formulation of perturbative string theory. This review can serve as a self-contained introduction to loop quantum gravity and related areas."
 
Last edited:
  • #322
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505043

Consistent discretizations: the Gowdy spacetimes
Rodolfo Gambini, Marcelo Ponce, Jorge Pullin
10 pages, 8 figures

"We apply the consistent discretization scheme to general relativity particularized to the Gowdy space-times. This is the first time the framework has been applied in detail in a non-linear generally-covariant gravitational situation with local degrees of freedom. We show that the scheme can be correctly used to numerically evolve the space-times. We show that the resulting numerical schemes are convergent and preserve approximately the constraints as expected."

We now seem to have several distinct but related quantum gravity approaches to cosmology.

1. full LQG
2. LQC (as Bojowald and others do it)
3. the older pre-Loop quantum gravity (various people: Husain, Modesto, Reuter)
using the Wheeler-DeWitt eqn and quantizing the metric.
4. Gambini-Pullin consistent discretizations approach

and more (don't forget Renate Loll, and the semiclassical analysis of Ganashyam Date)

it will be interesting to see who confirms whose results.
 
Last edited:
  • #323
Gambini and Pullin have been posting a lot lately. Three papers just this month (May 2005). Here is one from earlier this month.
Gambini and Pullin have a unique approach to quantum gravity, not LQG but able to make contact with LQG in some of its results. There is no Hamiltonian constraint in their approach unlike in LQG, and no "problem of time"

Ashtekar considers G&P "consistent discretization" one of 3 or 4 promising approaches to quantizing General Relativity (particularly as to the dynamics) and evidently he is going to include G&P in the landmark book he is putting together called "100 Years of Relativity".

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505023
Discrete space-time
Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge Pullin
16 pages, submitted to the volume "100 Years of Relativity - Space-time Structure: Einstein and Beyond", A. Ashtekar, ed., to be published by World Scientific.

"We review recent efforts to construct gravitational theories on discrete space-times, usually referred to as the "consistent discretization'' approach. The resulting theories are free of constraints at the canonical level and therefore allow to tackle many problems that cannot be currently addressed in continuum quantum gravity. In particular the theories imply a natural method for resolving the big bang (and other types) of singularities and predict a fundamental mechanism for decoherence of quantum states that might be relevant to the black hole information paradox. At a classical level, the theories may provide an attractive new path for the exploration of issues in numerical relativity. Finally, the theories can make direct contact with several kinematical results of continuum loop quantum gravity. We review in broad terms several of these results and present in detail as an illustration the classical treatment with this technique of the simple yet conceptually challenging model of two oscillators with constant energy sum."

Here is one they posted today:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505052
Classical and quantum general relativity: a new paradigm
Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge Pullin
Comments: 8 pages, one figure

"We argue that recent developments in discretizations of classical and quantum gravity imply a new paradigm for doing research in these areas. The paradigm consists in discretizing the theory in such a way that the resulting discrete theory has no constraints. This solves many of the hard conceptual problems of quantum gravity. It also appears as a useful tool in some numerical simulations of interest in classical relativity. We outline some of the salient aspects and results of this new framework."
 
  • #324
Here is Martin Bojowald's latest survey of LQC

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505057
Elements of Loop Quantum Cosmology
Martin Bojowald
30 pages, 4 figures, Chapter contributed to "100 Years of Relativity - Space-time Structure: Einstein and Beyond", Ed. A. Ashtekar (World Scientific)
Report-no: AEI-2005-025

"The expansion of our universe, when followed backward in time, implies that it emerged from a phase of huge density, the big bang. These stages are so extreme that classical general relativity combined with matter theories is not able to describe them properly, and one has to refer to quantum gravity. A complete quantization of gravity has not yet been developed, but there are many results about key properties to be expected. When applied to cosmology, a consistent picture of the early universe arises which is free of the classical pathologies and has implications for the generation of structure which are potentially observable in the near future."

the style of this survey is very un-headline grabbing.
according to LQC a gravitational collapse preceded the current expansion and that the turnaround from contraction to expansion, sometimes called the bounce, involved a flip in the orientation of the spatial triad or volume element.
also according to LQC inflation is generic, it happens after a bounce automatically without fine tuning or much extra paraphernalia. some Bojo short papers headline these results.

however you can either think of LQC as a testable theory IN ITS OWN RIGHT or you can think of it as a simplified stripped-down version of the LQG FULL THEORY and if you think of it as a simplification of the full LQG theory then all these conclusions have to be checked by more elaborate calculation in the full theory. this is now in progress.

So now I guess that LQC people are being very modest and are politely waiting for the elaborate LQG ceremony of consulting the entrails of the full theory to see in what sense they confirm the LQC results.

I may put together a reading list of a few SHORT Bojowald papers that are more exciting reading than this careful survey.
 
Last edited:
  • #325
Here is a recent Ambjorn Jurkiewicz Loll (AJL) paper. They say their long article called Reconstructing the Universe dated May 2005 from the University of Utrecht, is to appear. But it is not yet out on archiv.


http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505113
Spectral Dimension of the Universe
J. Ambjorn (NBI Copenhagen and U. Utrecht), J. Jurkiewicz (U. Krakow), R. Loll (U. Utrecht)
10 pages, 1 figure
SPIN-05/05, ITP-UU-05/07

"We measure the spectral dimension of universes emerging from nonperturbative quantum gravity, defined through state sums of causal triangulated geometries. While four-dimensional on large scales, the quantum universe appears two-dimensional at short distances. We conclude that quantum gravity may be "self-renormalizing" at the Planck scale, by virtue of a mechanism of dynamical dimensional reduction."

=========
this thread is a substitute for a sticky thread devolted to Loop-and-allied LINKS: a kind of library to store useful online LQG-and-related stuff.
Periodically I try to sort it out and organize the links selectively and by topic. this has not been done for a while.

There are other Renate Loll or AJL links back further in this thread
==========

this present paper, about the spacetime dimension being less than 4D at very small scale, has its own thread for discussion
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=75472
 
Last edited:
  • #326
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505081
Physical effects of the Immirzi parameter
Alejandro Perez, Carlo Rovelli
3 pages

"The Immirzi parameter is a constant appearing in the version of the general relativity action utilized as a starting point for the loop quantization of gravity.The parameter is commonly believed not to show up in the equations of motion, because it appears in front of a term in the action that vanishes on shell. We show that in the presence of fermions, instead, the Immirzi term of the action does not vanish on shell, and the Immirzi parameter appears in the equations of motion. It is the coupling constant of a parity violating four-fermion interaction. Therefore the nontriviality of the Immirzi parameter leads to effects that are observables in principle, even independently from nonperturbative quantum gravity."
 
  • #327
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505154
Reconstructing the Universe
J. Ambjorn (NBI Copenhagen and U. Utrecht), J. Jurkiewicz (U. Krakow), R. Loll (U. Utrecht)
52 pages, 20 postscript figures

"We provide detailed evidence for the claim that nonperturbative quantum gravity, defined through state sums of causal triangulated geometries, possesses a large-scale limit in which the dimension of spacetime is four and the dynamics of the volume of the universe behaves semiclassically. This is a first step in reconstructing the universe from a dynamical principle at the Planck scale, and at the same time provides a nontrivial consistency check of the method of causal dynamical triangulations. A closer look at the quantum geometry reveals a number of highly nonclassical aspects, including a dynamical reduction of spacetime to two dimensions on short scales and a fractal structure of slices of constant time."
 
Last edited:
  • #328
marcus said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505081
Physical effects of the Immirzi parameter
Alejandro Perez, Carlo Rovelli
3 pages

"The Immirzi parameter is a constant appearing in the version of the general relativity action utilized as a starting point for the loop quantization of gravity.The parameter is commonly believed not to show up in the equations of motion, because it appears in front of a term in the action that vanishes on shell. We show that in the presence of fermions, instead, the Immirzi term of the action does not vanish on shell, and the Immirzi parameter appears in the equations of motion. It is the coupling constant of a parity violating four-fermion interaction. Therefore the nontriviality of the Immirzi parameter leads to effects that are observables in principle, even independently from nonperturbative quantum gravity."

Marcus, this is a bu**er!

I spent some time on arxiv, looking for a paper on The Immirzi parameter !..hoping to link it to some recent postings, I came offline and spent three hours going through pre-prints I have myself, this is amazing!

Great, and thanks for this link.

P.S I did not see this paper when browsing arxiv so I guess you have a time advantage over the UK
 
  • #329
Can anyone connect the dots and explain what sort of context one could observe the Immirzi parameter effects in?
 
  • #330
Spin_Network, I'm glad you found the Perez Rovelli paper useful.

Ohwilleke, I started a separate thread about the paper in hopes of some comment or clarification.

ohwilleke said:
Can anyone connect the dots and explain what sort of context one could observe the Immirzi parameter effects in?

thanks to selfAdjoint for noticing another new CDT paper. the rate of posting CDT papers seems to be up this year. here is the one that sA flagged:

http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0505165
A statistical formalism of Causal Dynamical Triangulations
Mohammad H. Ansari, Fotini Markopoulou
20 pages, 19 pictures, 1 graph

"We rewrite the 1+1 Causal Dynamical Triangulations model as a spin system and thus provide a new method of solution of the model."

here's another Loop related paper, by Kirill Krasnov, who has co-authored with Laurent Freidel IIRC

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505174
Quantum Gravity with Matter via Group Field Theory
Kirill Krasnov
43 pages, many figures
A generalization of the matrix model idea to quantum gravity in three and higher dimensions is known as group field theory (GFT). In this paper we show how GFT can be used to describe 3D quantum gravity coupled to point particles. This is achieved by a generalization similar to the one used in 2D where multi-matrix models or matrix quantum mechanics are considered. Thus, we replace the group that leads to pure quantum gravity by the twisted product of the group with its dual -the so-called Drinfeld double of the group. The Drinfeld double is a quantum group in that it is an algebra that is both non-commutative and non-cocommutative, and special care is needed to define group field theory for it. We show how this is done, and consider the resulting GFT models. Of special interest is a new topological model that is the "Ponzano-Regge'' model for the Drinfeld double. We also consider a more general class of models that are defined using not GFT, but the so-called chain mail techniques. A general model of this class does not produce 3-manifold invariants, but has an interpretation in terms of point particle Feynman diagrams."

I have not checked this one out, but Krasnov is an old hand and it is probably worth keeping the link within easy reach
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #331
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505111
Entropy and Area in Loop Quantum Gravity
John Swain
7 pages, this essay received an Honourable Mention in the Gravity Research Foundation Essay Competition 2005

"Black hole thermodynamics suggests that the maximum entropy that can be contained in a region of space is proportional to the area enclosing it rather than its volume. I argue that this follows naturally from loop quantum gravity and a result of Kolmogorov and Bardzin' on the the realizability of networks in three dimensions. This represents an alternative to other approaches in which some sort of correlation between field configurations helps limit the degrees of freedom within a region. It also provides an approach to thinking about black hole entropy in terms of states inside rather than on its surface. Intuitively, a spin network complicated enough to imbue a region with volume only let's that volume grow as quickly as the area bounding it."
 
  • #332
David Poulin investigates relational time and gradual decoherence
I am not sure if his papers are relevant enough to QG for me to flag them, here is one
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0505175
Relational time for systems of oscillators
G.J.Milburn, David Poulin
Contribution to the Int. J. of Quant. Info. issue dedicated to the memory of Asher Peres

"Using an elementary example based on two simple harmonic oscillators, we show how a relational time may be defined that leads to an approximate Schrodinger dynamics for subsystems, with corrections leading to an intrinsic decoherence in the energy eigenstates of the subsystem."

here is another
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0505081
A Relational Formulation of Quantum Theory
David Poulin
14 pages, comments welcome

"We investigate, with the help of a simple model, how a relational quantum theory can emerge from the combination of the general framework of quantum mechanics with the requirement of background independence of general relativity. More precisely, we argue that any quantum mechanical experiment admits a purely relational description at a fundamental level, from which the original "non-relational" theory emerges in a semi-classical limit. According to this thesis, the non-relational theory is therefore an approximation of the fundamental relational theory. We propose four simple rules that can be used to translate an "orthodox" quantum mechanical description into a relational description, independent of an external spatial reference frame or clock. The techniques used to construct these relational theories are motivated by a Bayesian approach to quantum mechanics, and rely on the noiseless subsystem method of quantum information science used to protect quantum states against undesired noise. The relational theory naturally predicts a fundamental decoherence mechanism, so an arrow of time emerges from a time-symmetric theory. Moreover, there is no need for a "collapse of the wave packet" in this theory: the probability interpretation is only applied to diagonal density operators. Finally, the physical states of the relational theory can be described in terms of "spin networks" introduced by Penrose as a combinatorial description of geometry, and widely studied in the loop formulation of quantum gravity. Thus, our simple bottom-up approach (starting from the semi-classical limit to derive the quantum theory) may offer interesting insights on the low energy limit of quantum gravity."

i cannot evaluate this or vouch for it. just feel a nagging sense that we ought to keep tabs on research in relational time. Gambini and Pullin have some papers about it
 
Last edited:
  • #333
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506035
Counting a black hole in Lorentzian product triangulations
B. Dittrich (AEI, Golm), R. Loll (U. Utrecht)
42 pages, 11 figures

"We take a step toward a nonperturbative gravitational path integral for black-hole geometries by deriving an expression for the expansion rate of null geodesic congruences in the approach of causal dynamical triangulations. We propose to use the integrated expansion rate in building a quantum horizon finder in the sum over spacetime geometries. It takes the form of a counting formula for various types of discrete building blocks which differ in how they focus and defocus light rays. In the course of the derivation, we introduce the concept of a Lorentzian dynamical triangulation of product type, whose applicability goes beyond that of describing black-hole configurations."

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506031
Hermann Nicolai's contribution to Abhay Ashtekar's new book

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506024
a new Loop Quantum Cosmology paper

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506021
new MOND paper by Moffat

There are now at least 7 chapters of Ashtekar's book (A Hundred Years of Relativity) available as arxiv preprint. Here is a post about the book giving links to the other chapters:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=566800&postcount=56
 
Last edited:
  • #334
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0506075
General Relativity in the Undergraduate Physics Curriculum
James B. Hartle
9 pages, 2 figures

"Einstein's general relativity is increasingly important in contemporary physics on the frontiers of both the very largest distance scales (astrophysics and cosmology) and the very smallest(elementary particle physics). This paper makes the case for a 'physics first' approach to introducing general relativity to undergraduate physics majors."




http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0506067
A group field theory for 3d quantum gravity coupled to a scalar field
Laurent Freidel, Daniele Oriti, James Ryan
11 pages

"We present a new group field theory model, generalising the Boulatov model, which incorporates both 3-dimensional gravity and matter coupled to gravity. We show that the Feynman diagram amplitudes of this model are given by Riemannian quantum gravity spin foam amplitudes coupled to a scalar matter field. We briefly discuss the features of this model and its possible generalisations."

---------------------------
some comment: I've been watching Freidel's work with the greatest interest for the past couple of years. He made some waves earlier this year with two papers, Freidel/Starodubtsev (that Baez called to our attention) and Freidel/Livine (Ponzano-Regge revisited III).

Freidel is at Uni. Lyon in France (also part time Perimeter in Canada) and the other two authors are at Cambridge in the UK.
Here is an exerpt from the Introduction section of the new Freidel paper:

---quote gr-qc/0506067---
Spin foam models [1, 2] represent a purely combinatorial and algebraic implementation of the sum-over-histories approach to quantum gravity, in any signature and spacetime dimension, with an abstract 2-complex playing the role of a discrete spacetime, and algebraic data from the representation theory of the Lorentz group playing the role of geometric data assigned to it.

This approach has recently been developed to a great extent in the 3-dimensional case. It is now clear that it provides a full quantisation of pure gravity[3], whose relation with the one obtained by other approaches is well understood[4, 5].

Moreover, matter can be consistently included in the picture[3, 6], providing a link between spin foam models and effective field theory[7] living on a non-commutative geometry. This picture allows us to naturally address the semi-classical limit of spin foam models and shows that quantum gravity in dimension 3 effectively follows the principle of the so-called deformed (or doubly) special relativity[8].

The group field theory formalism[9] represents a generalisation of matrix models of 2-dimensional quantum gravity [10]. It is a universal structure lying behind any spin foam model for quantum gravity[11, 12], providing a third quantisation point of view on gravity[9] and allowing us to sum over pure quantum gravity amplitudes associated with different topologies[13].

In this picture, spin foams, and thus spacetime itself, appear as (higher-dimensional analogues of) Feynman diagrams of a field theory defined on a group manifold and spin foam amplitudes are simply the Feynman amplitudes weighting the different graphs in the perturbative expansion of the quantum field theory.

On the other hand, we can construct a noncommutative field theory whose Feynman diagram amplitudes reproduce the coupling of matter fields to 3d quantum gravity for a trivial topology of spacetime[7]. Remarkably, the momenta of the fields are labelled also by group elements.

Moreover, in three dimensions there is a duality between matter and geometry, and the insertion of matter can be understood as the insertion of a topological defect charged under the Poincaré group[3].

This suggests that one should be able to treat the third quantisation of gravity and the second quantisation of matter fields in one stroke (see[14] for an early attempt). The purpose of this paper is to study how the coupling of matter to quantum gravity is realized in the group field theory, and whether it is possible to write down a group field theory for gravity and particles that reproduces the amplitudes derived in [3] coupling quantum matter to quantum geometry. This is what we achieve in the present work.

The way the correct amplitudes are generated as Feynman amplitudes of the group field theory is highly non-trivial. It requires an extension of the usual group field theory (gft) formalism to a higher number of field variables, and produces an interesting intertwining of gravity and matter degrees of freedom, as we are going to discuss in the following...
---endquote---

back in post #339 of this thread there is a link to a related paper that also appeared recently:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505174
Quantum Gravity with Matter via Group Field Theory
Kirill Krasnov
43 pages, many figures

(as one would expect, the Krasnov paper is cited by Freidel et al)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #335
new paper DSR paper by Kowalski-Glikman

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506082
Quantized Black Holes, Their Spectrum and Radiation
I.B. Khriplovich
----time only to note this to check out later----

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506084
Doubly Special Relativity as a Limit of Gravity
Katarzyna Imilkowska, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman
26 pages, Submitted to Lecture Notes in Physics

"Doubly Special Relativity (DSR) is a theory with two observer-independent scales, of velocity and mass, which is expected to replace Special Relativity at ultra-high energies. In these notes we first discuss the postulates of DSR, and then turn to presenting arguments supporting the hypothesis that DSR can be regarded as a flat space, semiclassical limit of gravity. The notes are based on the talk presented at the conference Special Relativity -- Will it Survive the Next 100 Years?''

my comment: a significant development this year was the paper by Freidel and Starodubtsev hep-th/0501191 "Quantum Gravity in Terms of Topological Observables". this is some way a follow-up on that.
At PF we have discussed Kowalski-Glikman work on several occasions, he being one of the leading theorists involved in DSR. He organized the Polish Winterschool workshop on QG Phenomenology of February 2004. Often works with QG people.
Now see page 8 of the KG et al paper----they are taking off from the QG formalism of Freidel and Starodubtsev. this is the "BF" approach where it was found there is a possible way to get a BACKGROUND INDEPENDENT, but nevertheless PERTURBATIVE approach, with the cosmological constant and the Barbero-Immirzi parameter playing significant roles.

KG is arguing as generally as he can that the flat limit of QG should be not Minkowski space but the corresponding DSR space (very much like Minkowski but with a second invariant scale)

the exposition is pedagogical, the level is of lecture notes for graduate students, so it is easier reading than usual Kowalski-Glikman. and also kind of an update since it comes after the landmark Freidel-Starodubtsev.
 
Last edited:
  • #336
Marcus said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506082
Quantized Black Holes, Their Spectrum and Radiation
I.B. Khriplovich
----time only to note this to check out later----

I read the paper. Here is the abstract:


Under quite natural general assumptions, the following results are obtained. The maximum entropy of a quantized surface is demonstrated to be proportional to the surface area in the classical limit. The general structure of the horizon spectrum is found. The discrete spectrum of thermal radiation of a black hole Under quite natural general assumptions, the following results are obtained. The maximum entropy of a quantized surface is demonstrated to be proportional to the surface area in the classical limit. The general structure of the horizon spectrum is found. The discrete spectrum of thermal radiation of a black hole fits the Wien profile. The natural widths of the lines are much smaller than the distances between them. The total intensity of the thermal radiation is estimated.
In the special case of loop quantum gravity, the value of the Barbero -- Immirzi parameter is found. Different values for this parameter, obtained under additional assumption that the horizon is described by a U(1) Chern -- Simons theory, are demonstrated to be in conflict with the firmly established holographic bound.

His derivation of the "holographic bound", which he uses several times to show other people's calculations are wrong, is particularly intuitive. But the whole argument is really just baby statistical mechanics applied to a surface constructed of patches forming the event horizon of a black hole. Many of us here should be able to follow it.
 
  • #337
new paper by Shahar Hod

more about the black hole radiation spectrum

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0506214
Selection Rules for Black-Hole Quantum Transitions
Shahar Hod, Uri Keshet
4 pages, 2 figures

"We suggest that quantum transitions of black holes comply with selection rules, analogous to those of atomic spectroscopy. In order to identify such rules, we apply Bohr's correspondence principle to the quasinormal ringing frequencies of black holes. In this context, classical ringing frequencies with an asymptotically vanishing real part
\omega_R
correspond to virtual quanta, and may thus be interpreted as forbidden quantum transitions. With this motivation, we calculate the quasinormal spectrum of neutrino fields in spherically symmetric black-hole spacetimes. It is shown that
\omega_R \rightarrow 0
for these resonances, suggesting that the corresponding fermionic transitions are quantum mechanically forbidden."


Shahar Hod was who started the uproar about quasinormal vibration modes of black holes in the first place. He cites his own 1998 paper
 
  • #338
new black hole paper by Bojowald

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506128
Nonsingular Black Holes and Degrees of Freedom in Quantum Gravity

Martin Bojowald
4 pages

"Spherically symmetric space-times provide many examples for interesting black hole solutions, which classically are all singular. Following a general program, space-like singularities in spherically symmetric quantum geometry, as well as other inhomogeneous models, are shown to be absent. Moreover, one sees how the classical reduction from infinitely many kinematical degrees of freedom to only one physical one, the mass, can arise, where aspects of quantum cosmology such as the problem of initial conditions play a role."
 
  • #339
marcus said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506128
Nonsingular Black Holes and Degrees of Freedom in Quantum Gravity

Martin Bojowald
4 pages

"Spherically symmetric space-times provide many examples for interesting black hole solutions, which classically are all singular. Following a general program, space-like singularities in spherically symmetric quantum geometry, as well as other inhomogeneous models, are shown to be absent. Moreover, one sees how the classical reduction from infinitely many kinematical degrees of freedom to only one physical one, the mass, can arise, where aspects of quantum cosmology such as the problem of initial conditions play a role."

Marcus the last two papers are great, Hod's in perticular, very interesting!
 
  • #340
...the last two papers are great, Hod's in perticular, very interesting!

Spin Network, I am so glad you found the papers readable and of interest to you! At first sight, I could not understand much of the Hod paper. but it was his intuition (more than 5 years ago now IIRC) that set off that long train of research into BH quasinormal modes (with considerable consequences for quantum gravity, especially Loop). so posting the Hod link was a no brainer.

this next link is about nothing in particular. I just need a place to stash it so as to have it handy.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/physics_service.html
it is a good search engine, but the database is limited in some way
I'm not certain about
 
Last edited:
  • #341
Here's an odd one!

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506129
Quantum evaporation of a naked singularity
Rituparno Goswami, Pankaj S. Joshi, Parampreet Singh
4 pages, 2 figures

I respect Parampreet Singh. He is a postdoc of Ashtekar at Penn State who has coauthored interesting papers with Bojowald and with Roy Maartens.
Several of his seminar talks at Penn State are online---talking about LQC phenomenology: observable signature of Loop gravity in CMB and so forth. He is very focused on observable quantum gravity effects.

I wasnt familiar with the other two authors, but now I see that e.g. Goswami has 15 papers and has co-authored with Bojowald on an interesting one that we discussed earlier at PF
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503041

This present paper talks about something very strange. Not sure what to make of it!

"We investigate here gravitational collapse of a scalar field model which classically leads to a naked singularity. We show that non-perturbative semi-classical modifications near the singularity, based on loop quantum gravity, give rise to a strong outward flux of energy. This leads to the dissolution of the collapsing cloud before a naked singularity can form. Quantum gravitational effects can thus censor naked singularities by avoiding their formation. Further, quantum gravity induced mass flux has a distinct feature which can lead to a novel observable signature in astrophysical bursts."

it seems that the authors may have found a quantum reason for the absence of naked glitches ("cosm. censorship") and also they may have may have may have a prediction about gammaray bursts which could provide a way of empirically testing what they are saying.
 
Last edited:
  • #342
marcus said:
more about the black hole radiation spectrum

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0506214
Selection Rules for Black-Hole Quantum Transitions
Shahar Hod, Uri Keshet
4 pages, 2 figures

"We suggest that quantum transitions of black holes comply with selection rules, analogous to those of atomic spectroscopy. In order to identify such rules, we apply Bohr's correspondence principle to the quasinormal ringing frequencies of black holes. In this context, classical ringing frequencies with an asymptotically vanishing real part
\omega_R
correspond to virtual quanta, and may thus be interpreted as forbidden quantum transitions. With this motivation, we calculate the quasinormal spectrum of neutrino fields in spherically symmetric black-hole spacetimes. It is shown that
\omega_R \rightarrow 0
for these resonances, suggesting that the corresponding fermionic transitions are quantum mechanically forbidden."


Shahar Hod was who started the uproar about quasinormal vibration modes of black holes in the first place. He cites his own 1998 paper

Marcus this paper may be of great interest:http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0506228

he thanks Rovelli and Smolin to name but two!

and this paper may/will? be of interest to the Hod paper:http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0506231
 
  • #343
  • #344
selfAdjoint said:
http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0506228 is certainly a greatly interesting paper! I am going to bring it to the attention of the quantum physics subforum.

thanks for fielding that one!
 
  • #345
another shoe drops re Pioneer anomaly

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506139

"...The existence of the Pioneer anomaly is no longer in doubt. Further, after much understandable hesitancy, a steadily growing part of the community has concluded that the anomaly should be subject to interpretation. Our program presents an ordered approach to doing this..."


"...This mission is designed to determine the origin of the discovered anomaly and to characterize its properties to an accuracy of at least three orders of magnitude below its measured value ..."

A MISSION TO EXPLORE THE PIONEER ANOMALY

the list of authors has some 39 names, they call themselves the Pioneer Collaboration.

it is an 8 page paper.

the noises keep getting louder that something about gravity needs adjustment
 
Last edited:
  • #346
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0507012
Taming the cosmological constant in 2D causal quantum gravity with topology change

R. Loll (U. Utrecht), W. Westra (U. Utrecht), S. Zohren (U. Utrecht, RWTH Aachen)
19 pages, 4 figures

"As shown in previous work, there is a well-defined nonperturbative gravitational path integral including an explicit sum over topologies in the setting of Causal Dynamical Triangulations in two dimensions. In this paper we derive a complete analytical solution of the quantum continuum dynamics of this model, obtained uniquely by means of a double-scaling limit. We show that the presence of infinitesimal wormholes leads to a decrease in the effective cosmological constant, reminiscent of the suppression mechanism considered by Coleman and others in the four-dimensional Euclidean path integral. Remarkably, in the continuum limit we obtain a finite spacetime density of microscopic wormholes without assuming fundamental discreteness. This shows that one can in principle make sense of a gravitational path integral which includes a sum over topologies, provided suitable causality restrictions are imposed on the path integral histories."

this is the paper they will present this month in Paris at the Einstein2005 conference

Willem Westra did his Masters at Utrecht working for Loll, on this problem, and they published a paper in 2003 about it, and now he is doing his PhD.
Including topology-change in the path integral is very interesting.
one takes a weighted average not only over all possible spacetime geometries, but also adds up all possible spacetime topologies and all possible geometries of each topology. it could get amusing
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #347
Abhay Ashtekar and Martin Bojowald have posted an updated version of this
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504029
Black hole evaporation: A paradigm
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald
21 pages, 4 figures, v2: new references and discussion of relation to other ideas

"A paradigm describing black hole evaporation in non-perturbative quantum gravity is developed by combining two sets of detailed results: i) resolution of the Schwarzschild singularity using quantum geometry methods; and ii) time-evolution of black holes in the trapping and dynamical horizon frameworks. Quantum geometry effects introduce a major modification in the traditional space-time diagram of black hole evaporation, providing a possible mechanism for recovery of information that is classically lost in the process of black hole formation. The paradigm is developed directly in the Lorentzian regime and necessary conditions for its viability are discussed. If these conditions are met, much of the tension between expectations based on space-time geometry and structure of quantum theory would be resolved."

Black hole evaporation seems to be a hot topic in quantum gravity now---thinking of the recent paper by Joshi, Goswami, and P.Singh. Also a couple recent papers by Bojowald solo.
BTW in this one Ashtekar and Bojo cite this highly readable and provocative paper by Sean Hayward
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504038
The disinformation problem for black holes (pop version)
Sean A. Hayward
6 pages
The supposed information paradox for black holes is based on the fundamental misunderstanding that black holes are usefully defined by event horizons. Understood in terms of locally defined trapping horizons, the paradox disappears: information will escape from an evaporating black hole. According to classical properties of trapping horizons, a general scenario is outlined whereby a black hole evaporates completely without singularity, event horizon or loss of energy or information.

as another BTW here are Ruth Williams' papers
http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/au:+Williams_Ruth/0/1/0/all/0/1
(she co-authored with Tullio Regge around 2000) and here is a new one
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506137
Nonlocal Effective Field Equations for Quantum Cosmology
Herbert W. Hamber, Ruth M. Williams
9 pages

"The possibility that the strength of gravitational interactions might slowly increase with distance, is explored by formulating a set of effective field equations, which incorporate the gravitational, vacuum-polarization induced, running of Newton's constant G. The resulting long distance (or large time) behaviour depends on only one adjustable parameter \xi, and the implications for the Robertson-Walker universe are calculated, predicting an accelerated power-law expansion at later times t \sim \xi \sim 1/H.
 
  • #348
This week, Loll and Westra have posted an updated version of their 2003 paper
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0306183
Sum over topologies and double-scaling limit in 2D Lorentzian quantum gravity
9 pages, 3 Postscript figures; added comments on strip versus bulk partition function

"We construct a combined non-perturbative path integral over geometries and topologies for two-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity. The Lorentzian structure is used in an essential way to exclude geometries with unacceptably large causality violations. The remaining sum can be performed analytically and possesses a unique and well-defined double-scaling limit, a property which has eluded similar models of Euclidean quantum gravity in the past."

this was a first. before, the moment you allowed wormholes the sum would blow up and you would get infinities. too many baby universes, too many possibilities. so you had to make a rule against topology-change at the outset.
I am oversimplifying. Anyway in earlier CDT the topology of spacetime had to be restricted to be simple, and then within that you could have all different shape geometries. But this little paper of Loll and Westra is a kind of landmark because at least in 2D they are allowing topology-change and it is not a complete disaster.

now there is a little more progress
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0507012
Taming the cosmological constant in 2D causal quantum gravity with topology change
They are getting their stuff together for the Paris conference this month.
there is this curious result of a finite density of wormholes.
they are going back and polishing the 2003 paper a little, because it will be a footnote in the 2005 paper they give in Paris. what busy people
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #349
Just a week or so ago this one came out, Parmapreet Singh being one of the co-authors.

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506129
Quantum evaporation of a naked singularity
Rituparno Goswami, Pankaj S. Joshi, Parampreet Singh
4 pages, 2 figures

"We investigate here gravitational collapse of a scalar field model which classically leads to a naked singularity. We show that non-perturbative semi-classical modifications near the singularity, based on loop quantum gravity, give rise to a strong outward flux of energy. This leads to the dissolution of the collapsing cloud before a naked singularity can form. Quantum gravitational effects can thus censor naked singularities by avoiding their formation. Further, quantum gravity induced mass flux has a distinct feature which can lead to a novel observable signature in astrophysical bursts."

Today, another P. Singh paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0507029
Semi-classical States, Effective Dynamics and Classical Emergence in Loop Quantum Cosmology
Parampreet Singh, Kevin Vandersloot
8 pages, 4 figures
IGPG-05/7-1, AEI-2005-122

"We construct physical semi-classical states annihilated by the Hamiltonian constraint operator in the framework of loop quantum cosmology as a method of systematically determining the regime and validity of the semi-classical limit of the quantum theory. Our results indicate that the evolution can be effectively described using continuous classical equations of motion with non-perturbative corrections down to near the Planck scale below which the universe can only be described by the discrete quantum constraint. These results, for the first time, provide concrete evidence of the emergence of classicality in loop quantum cosmology and also clearly demarcate the domain of validity of different effective theories. We prove that discrete quantum geometry effects may become very significant and lead to various new phenomenological applications. Furthermore the understanding of semi-classical states allows for a framework for interpreting the quantum wavefunctions and understanding questions of a semi-classical nature within the quantum theory of loop quantum cosmology."

mounting evidence that in the cosmology sector LQG is consistent with classical cosmology----that it has the right largescale limit in other words.
 
  • #350
Thiemann decides which volume operator is right

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0507036
Consistency Check on Volume and Triad Operator Quantisation in Loop Quantum Gravity I
Kristina Giesel, Thomas Thiemann
20 pages, 5 figures

"The volume operator plays a pivotal role for the quantum dynamics of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). It is essential in order to construct Triad operators that enter the Hamiltonian constraint and which become densely defined operators on the full Hilbert space even though in the classical theory the triad becomes singular when classical GR breaks down. The expression for the volume and triad operators derives from the quantisation of the fundamental electric flux operator of LQG by a complicated regularisation procedure. In fact, there are two inequivalent volume operators available in the literature and, moreover, both operators are unique only up to a finite, multiplicative constant which should be viewed as a regularisation ambiguity. Now on the one hand, classical volumes and triads can be expressed directly in terms of fluxes and this fact was used to construct the corresponding volume and triad operators. On the other hand, fluxes can be expressed in terms of triads and therefore one can also view the volume operator as fundamental and consider the flux operator as a derived operator. In this paper we examine whether the volume, triad and flux quantisations are consistent with each other. The results of this consistency analysis are rather surprising. Among other findings we show: 1. The regularisation constant can be uniquely fixed. 2. One of the volume operators can be ruled out as inconsistent. 3. Factor ordering ambiguities in the definition of triad operators are immaterial for the classical limit of the derived flux operator. The results of this paper show that within full LQG triad operators are consistently quantized. In this paper we present ideas and results of the consistency check. In a companion paper we supply detailed proofs."

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0507037
Consistency Check on Volume and Triad Operator Quantisation in Loop Quantum Gravity II

Kristina Giesel, Thomas Thiemann
67 pages, 6 figures, 36 pages paper, 31 pages appendix

"In this paper we provide the techniques and proofs for the resuls presented in our companion paper concerning the consistency check on volume and triad operator quantisation in Loop Quantum Gravity."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top