Lorentz Algebra in Boosts for the spin-1/2 Dirac Field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the commutation relations in Lorentz Algebra, specifically the relation involving the generators of rotations and boosts, and the role of the metric tensor in this context. Participants are exploring theoretical aspects related to the Dirac Equation and the implications of these algebraic structures.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the origin of the commutation relation and its similarity to angular momentum algebra in O(4), seeking clarification on the metric tensor's involvement.
  • Another participant refers to the "Master commutation" rule of the Lorentz section of the Poincaré group, suggesting that the relation defines the commutation rules between rotation and boost generators.
  • A different participant asserts that Lorentz algebra is synonymous with SO(4) algebra, clarifying that it is actually SO(3,1) algebra, and proposes deriving commutation relations for SO(4) while converting Kronecker deltas into metric tensors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation and derivation of the commutation relations, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the algebra and the definitions of terms like rotations and boosts, which may not be universally agreed upon. There are also references to specific texts that may contain varying interpretations of the commutation relations.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

What is the origin of the following commutation relation in Lorentz Algebra:

[tex][J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\alpha\beta}] = i(g^{\nu\alpha}J^{\mu\beta}-g^{\mu\alpha}J^{\nu\beta}-g^{\nu\beta}J^{\mu\alpha}+g^{\mu\beta}J^{\nu\alpha})[/tex]

This looks a whole lot similar to the commutation algebra of angular momentum in O(4). But how does the Metric Tensor enter here? I encountered this while studying about boosts in the context of the Dirac Equation.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
Hi,

What is the origin of the following commutation relation in Lorentz Algebra:

[tex][J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\alpha\beta}] = i(g^{\nu\alpha}J^{\mu\beta}-g^{\mu\alpha}J^{\nu\beta}-g^{\nu\beta}J^{\mu\alpha}+g^{\mu\beta}J^{\nu\alpha})[/tex]

This looks a whole lot similar to the commutation algebra of angular momentum in O(4). But how does the Metric Tensor enter here? I encountered this while studying about boosts in the context of the Dirac Equation.

Thanks.


This is the "Master commutation" rule of the Lorentz section of the Poincaré group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincaré_group

[itex]J^{\mu\nu}[/itex] can be both a rotation generator as well as a boost generator, so this is the most
general way of defining the commutation rules between these generators.


It's far simpler to look at the individual rules like [itex][J^i,J^i][/itex] and [itex][K^i,K^i][/itex] or [itex][J^i,K^i][/itex] where
J and K are the rotation and boost generators respectively.


You can find these in many books like Ryder, Weinberg (vol 1) or P&S


Regards, Hans
 
Thanks.
 
maverick280857 said:
Hi,

What is the origin of the following commutation relation in Lorentz Algebra:

[tex][J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\alpha\beta}] = i(g^{\nu\alpha}J^{\mu\beta}-g^{\mu\alpha}J^{\nu\beta}-g^{\nu\beta}J^{\mu\alpha}+g^{\mu\beta}J^{\nu\alpha})[/tex]

This looks a whole lot similar to the commutation algebra of angular momentum in O(4). But how does the Metric Tensor enter here? I encountered this while studying about boosts in the context of the Dirac Equation.

Thanks.

Lorentz algebra is SO(4) algebra, synonymous almost. To be exact, Lorentz algebra is SO(3,1) algebra. So you can derive the commutation relations for SO(4), and try to turn SO(4) into SO(3,1) by converting Krockner deltas into metric tensors by raising or lowering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K