Lorentz Transf. of Complex Null Tetrads: Formula (3.14-17)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of specific formulae related to complex null tetrads in the context of general relativity, particularly focusing on formulae (3.14), (3.15), and (3.17) from a referenced text. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how to derive formulae (3.14), (3.15), and (3.17) for a complex null tetrad.
  • Another participant inquires about the reference for these formulae, which is identified as the second edition of "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" by Stephani et al.
  • A participant mentions they are working on an elaboration of (3.17) but is temporarily distracted.
  • One participant suggests that simply showing the equality of certain expressions is insufficient to demonstrate the transformation defined by (3.17) and proposes a more detailed approach.
  • The same participant outlines a method to show that (3.17) defines a boost, including the definitions of new variables and their relationships to the original tetrads.
  • Mathematical expressions are provided to illustrate the transformation and the derivation of hyperbolic functions related to the boost.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to be exploring the topic collaboratively, with some providing insights and elaborations, but no consensus or resolution of disagreements is evident regarding the derivation or implications of the formulae.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions and dependencies on definitions are present, particularly regarding the notation and the transformations involved in the derivation of the formulae. The discussion does not resolve these aspects.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
For a complex null tetrad ##(\boldsymbol{m}, \overline{\boldsymbol{m}}, \boldsymbol{l}, \boldsymbol{k})##, how to arrive at formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)? The equation (3.16) is clear as is. (I checked already that they work i.e. that ##\boldsymbol{e}_a' \cdot \boldsymbol{e}_b' = 2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)}##.)

1640199241420.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)?
What reference are these from?
 
PeterDonis said:
What reference are these from?
These are from the second edition of "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" by Stephani et al. I have have an elaboration on (3.17), which I have started to type in, but my wife is pulling me away to watch someone get murdered ... er, to stream a show, so it will be a couple of hours before I get back to it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, ergospherical and martinbn
I have looked at (3.17). I suppose that it is not enough to show that
$$2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)} = 2m_{(a} \overline{m}_{b)} -2k_{(a} l_{b)},$$
as this is obvious for transformation (3.17).

I will proceed in a pedestrian way, i.e., I will show that (3.17) defines a boost. Inverting (3.12) gives (using notation that I dislike)
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} +\boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} - \boldsymbol{l} \right) .
\end{align}$$
Now define
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' +\boldsymbol{l}' \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}'_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' - \boldsymbol{l}' \right) ,
\end{align}$$
with ##\boldsymbol{k}'## and ##\boldsymbol{l}'## given by (3.17). Then, by (3.17),
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( A\boldsymbol{k} +A^{-1} \boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \frac{A}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 + \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) + \frac{A^{-1}}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 - \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) \right] \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_4 +\frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_3
\end{align}$$
Since
$$\left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 - \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 = 1, $$
we can set
$$\begin{align}
\cosh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \\
\sinh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right)
\end{align}$$
Something similar holds for ##\boldsymbol{E}_3##, so we have a boost with rapidity ##w## and speed ##v = \tanh w##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K