I Lorentz Transf. of Complex Null Tetrads: Formula (3.14-17)

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
For a complex null tetrad ##(\boldsymbol{m}, \overline{\boldsymbol{m}}, \boldsymbol{l}, \boldsymbol{k})##, how to arrive at formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)? The equation (3.16) is clear as is. (I checked already that they work i.e. that ##\boldsymbol{e}_a' \cdot \boldsymbol{e}_b' = 2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)}##.)

1640199241420.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)?
What reference are these from?
 
PeterDonis said:
What reference are these from?
These are from the second edition of "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" by Stephani et al. I have have an elaboration on (3.17), which I have started to type in, but my wife is pulling me away to watch someone get murdered ... er, to stream a show, so it will be a couple of hours before I get back to it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71, ergospherical and martinbn
I have looked at (3.17). I suppose that it is not enough to show that
$$2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)} = 2m_{(a} \overline{m}_{b)} -2k_{(a} l_{b)},$$
as this is obvious for transformation (3.17).

I will proceed in a pedestrian way, i.e., I will show that (3.17) defines a boost. Inverting (3.12) gives (using notation that I dislike)
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} +\boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} - \boldsymbol{l} \right) .
\end{align}$$
Now define
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' +\boldsymbol{l}' \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}'_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' - \boldsymbol{l}' \right) ,
\end{align}$$
with ##\boldsymbol{k}'## and ##\boldsymbol{l}'## given by (3.17). Then, by (3.17),
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( A\boldsymbol{k} +A^{-1} \boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \frac{A}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 + \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) + \frac{A^{-1}}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 - \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) \right] \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_4 +\frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_3
\end{align}$$
Since
$$\left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 - \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 = 1, $$
we can set
$$\begin{align}
\cosh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \\
\sinh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right)
\end{align}$$
Something similar holds for ##\boldsymbol{E}_3##, so we have a boost with rapidity ##w## and speed ##v = \tanh w##.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top