I Lorentz Transf. of Complex Null Tetrads: Formula (3.14-17)

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
For a complex null tetrad ##(\boldsymbol{m}, \overline{\boldsymbol{m}}, \boldsymbol{l}, \boldsymbol{k})##, how to arrive at formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)? The equation (3.16) is clear as is. (I checked already that they work i.e. that ##\boldsymbol{e}_a' \cdot \boldsymbol{e}_b' = 2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)}##.)

1640199241420.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)?
What reference are these from?
 
PeterDonis said:
What reference are these from?
These are from the second edition of "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" by Stephani et al. I have have an elaboration on (3.17), which I have started to type in, but my wife is pulling me away to watch someone get murdered ... er, to stream a show, so it will be a couple of hours before I get back to it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71, ergospherical and martinbn
I have looked at (3.17). I suppose that it is not enough to show that
$$2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)} = 2m_{(a} \overline{m}_{b)} -2k_{(a} l_{b)},$$
as this is obvious for transformation (3.17).

I will proceed in a pedestrian way, i.e., I will show that (3.17) defines a boost. Inverting (3.12) gives (using notation that I dislike)
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} +\boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} - \boldsymbol{l} \right) .
\end{align}$$
Now define
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' +\boldsymbol{l}' \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}'_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' - \boldsymbol{l}' \right) ,
\end{align}$$
with ##\boldsymbol{k}'## and ##\boldsymbol{l}'## given by (3.17). Then, by (3.17),
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( A\boldsymbol{k} +A^{-1} \boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \frac{A}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 + \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) + \frac{A^{-1}}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 - \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) \right] \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_4 +\frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_3
\end{align}$$
Since
$$\left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 - \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 = 1, $$
we can set
$$\begin{align}
\cosh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \\
\sinh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right)
\end{align}$$
Something similar holds for ##\boldsymbol{E}_3##, so we have a boost with rapidity ##w## and speed ##v = \tanh w##.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...

Similar threads

Back
Top