I Lorentz Transf. of Complex Null Tetrads: Formula (3.14-17)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving formulae (3.14), (3.15), and (3.17) for a complex null tetrad, referencing "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" by Stephani et al. The clarity of equation (3.16) is acknowledged, while the need for a detailed approach to demonstrate that (3.17) defines a boost is emphasized. The transformation involves defining new vectors ##\boldsymbol{E}_4## and ##\boldsymbol{E}_3##, leading to expressions for their primed counterparts. The relationship between the parameters A and the hyperbolic functions cosh and sinh is established, indicating a boost with rapidity ##w## and speed ##v = \tanh w##. The conversation highlights the mathematical intricacies involved in the transformation of tetrads.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
For a complex null tetrad ##(\boldsymbol{m}, \overline{\boldsymbol{m}}, \boldsymbol{l}, \boldsymbol{k})##, how to arrive at formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)? The equation (3.16) is clear as is. (I checked already that they work i.e. that ##\boldsymbol{e}_a' \cdot \boldsymbol{e}_b' = 2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)}##.)

1640199241420.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
formulae (3.14), (3.15) and (3.17)?
What reference are these from?
 
PeterDonis said:
What reference are these from?
These are from the second edition of "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations" by Stephani et al. I have have an elaboration on (3.17), which I have started to type in, but my wife is pulling me away to watch someone get murdered ... er, to stream a show, so it will be a couple of hours before I get back to it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71, ergospherical and martinbn
I have looked at (3.17). I suppose that it is not enough to show that
$$2m'_{(a} \overline{m}'_{b)} -2k'_{(a} l'_{b)} = 2m_{(a} \overline{m}_{b)} -2k_{(a} l_{b)},$$
as this is obvious for transformation (3.17).

I will proceed in a pedestrian way, i.e., I will show that (3.17) defines a boost. Inverting (3.12) gives (using notation that I dislike)
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} +\boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k} - \boldsymbol{l} \right) .
\end{align}$$
Now define
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' +\boldsymbol{l}' \right) \\
\boldsymbol{E}'_3 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{k}' - \boldsymbol{l}' \right) ,
\end{align}$$
with ##\boldsymbol{k}'## and ##\boldsymbol{l}'## given by (3.17). Then, by (3.17),
$$\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{E}'_4 &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( A\boldsymbol{k} +A^{-1} \boldsymbol{l} \right) \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \frac{A}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 + \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) + \frac{A^{-1}}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \boldsymbol{E}_4 - \boldsymbol{E_3} \right) \right] \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_4 +\frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \boldsymbol{E}_3
\end{align}$$
Since
$$\left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 - \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right) \right]^2 = 1, $$
we can set
$$\begin{align}
\cosh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A + A^{-1} \right) \\
\sinh w &= \frac{1}{2} \left( A - A^{-1} \right)
\end{align}$$
Something similar holds for ##\boldsymbol{E}_3##, so we have a boost with rapidity ##w## and speed ##v = \tanh w##.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Hello, everyone, hope someone will resolve my doubts. I have posted here some two years ago asking for an explanation of the Lorentz transforms derivation found in the Einstein 1905 paper. The answer I got seemed quite satisfactory. Two years after I revisit this derivation and this is what I see. In the Einstein original paper, the Lorentz transforms derivation included as a premise that light is always propagated along the direction perpendicular to the line of motion when viewed from the...

Similar threads