If you Lorentz transform a scalar:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]U^{-1}(\Lambda)\phi(x)U(\Lambda)=\phi(\Lambda^{-1}x) [/tex]

If you now perform another Lorentz transform, would it it look like this:

[tex]U^{-1}(\Lambda')U^{-1}(\Lambda)\phi(x)U(\Lambda)U(\Lambda')=\phi(\Lambda'^{-1}\Lambda^{-1}x) [/tex] ?

But isn't this wrong, because this expression is equal to:

[tex]U^{-1}(\Lambda\Lambda')\phi(x)U(\Lambda\Lambda')=\phi([\Lambda\Lambda']^{-1}x) [/tex]

and not:

[tex]U^{-1}(\Lambda'\Lambda)\phi(x)U(\Lambda'\Lambda)=\phi([\Lambda'\Lambda]^{-1}x) [/tex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Lorentz transform of a scalar in QM

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**