Lorentz Transform of Radial & Longitudinal Dependent Magnetic Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Lorentz transformation of a magnetic field dependent on both radial and longitudinal distributions of particles with a Gaussian profile. The standard Lorentz transformation equations were initially considered, but it was highlighted that the transformation becomes complex when the longitudinally dependent radial field is perpendicular to the boost axis. The magnetic field is defined as B_{\theta}=Const \times r^{-1/2}e^{-r^{2}/2\sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}, and participants suggested consulting advanced electromagnetism literature for further insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field theory
  • Knowledge of Gaussian distributions in physics
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions in LaTeX
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz transformation of electromagnetic fields in advanced electromagnetism textbooks
  • Research the implications of longitudinally dependent fields on magnetic field transformations
  • Explore the derivation of the Lorentz transformation for electric and magnetic fields
  • Review literature on Gaussian distributions in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students specializing in electromagnetism and special relativity, particularly those working with particle distributions and field transformations.

matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
Basically I am trying to lorentz transform the magnetic field along θ of a bunch particles which have a gaussian distribution to the radial electric field. However the magnetic field in θ is dependent on the longitiudinal distribution.
Now initially i thought we would just use the standard LT,

x=x'
y=y'
s'=/gamma (s-βct).
Now someone suggested to me that infact the transform will be non trivial when a longitudinal dependent radial field is perpendicular to the boost axis.
Can someone suggest some literature that would point me in the right direction?

Just for reference the field follows as,

B_{\theta}=Const \times r^(-1/2)e^{-r^{2}/2*sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}

Sorry i am not sure how to make it latex
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to Lorentz transform the B vector also. This is described in advanced EM books.
 
matt_crouch said:
B_{\theta}=Const \times r^(-1/2)e^{-r^{2}/2*sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}

Sorry i am not sure how to make it latex
Put a double-dollar before and after
$$B_{\theta}=Const \times r^(-1/2)e^{-r^{2}/2*sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}$$
Then correct the errors
$$B_{\theta}=\mbox{Const} \times r^{-1/2}e^{-r^{2}/2 \sigma_{r}^{2}} e^{-s^{2}/2\sigma_{s}^{2}}$$
...if that's what you meant.
 
matt_crouch said:
Now someone suggested to me that infact the transform will be non trivial when a longitudinal dependent radial field is perpendicular to the boost axis.
Can someone suggest some literature that would point me in the right direction?

Maybe this will help:

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node123.html

which presents the Lorentz transformation for E and B fields. To see the derivation, you have to work backwards through the preceding pages.
 
Ok thanks.. I'll have a look through
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K