Lower bounds on energy eigenvalues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating lower bounds on energy eigenvalues, specifically through the application of the Uncertainty Principle. It establishes that while the Variational method is effective for determining upper bounds, lower bounds can be derived by properly utilizing the Uncertainty Principle for various states. The conversation also touches on the process of guessing wave functions for excited states, ensuring orthogonality to previously chosen states, and mentions Temple's inequality as a potential method for exploring energy bounds beyond the ground state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Variational method in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Uncertainty Principle
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian operators and expectation values
  • Concept of orthogonality in wave functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Temple's inequality and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore advanced techniques for calculating excited state energy eigenvalues
  • Study the implications of the Uncertainty Principle on energy spectra
  • Investigate methods for constructing orthogonal wave functions in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students studying quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on energy eigenvalue calculations and variational methods.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3
Hi,
I'm interested in learning about what would be the compliment to the Variational method. I'm aware that the Variational method allows one to calculate upper bounds, but I'm wondering about methods to calculate lower bounds on energy eigenvalues. And for energies besides the ground state if such methods exist.

Are there methods to calculate lower bounds on energy eigenvalues (the ground state and higher)?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The lower bound for an energy spectrum is provided by the Uncertainty principle. You should just be able to use it properly. I think with a little thought, you can use it to find the lower bound for any state but it can't be generally formulated and is different for each case.
About finding the energy upper bound for states other than the ground state. For the ground state, you just guess(it can be an educated guess) a wave function and calculate the Hamiltonian's expectation value in that state and minimize it.
For the first excited state, you should again guess a wave function, but this time, you have the condition that this wave function should be orthogonal to the one you chose for the ground state. Then you do the same thing as the last case.
For second excited state, the wave function you guess should be orthogonal to the last two wave functions and so on.
 
Shyan said:
The lower bound for an energy spectrum is provided by the Uncertainty principle. You should just be able to use it properly. I think with a little thought, you can use it to find the lower bound for any state but it can't be generally formulated and is different for each case.
About finding the energy upper bound for states other than the ground state. For the ground state, you just guess(it can be an educated guess) a wave function and calculate the Hamiltonian's expectation value in that state and minimize it.
For the first excited state, you should again guess a wave function, but this time, you have the condition that this wave function should be orthogonal to the one you chose for the ground state. Then you do the same thing as the last case.
For second excited state, the wave function you guess should be orthogonal to the last two wave functions and so on.

Thanks for your response. You already taught me something! However, I was thinking more along the lines of something like Temple's inequality. An inequality relation using expectation values of the Hamiltonian. I have been trying to find something similar for other energies besides the ground state.
 
I don't know about that inequality so I can't help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K