Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

LQG and black holes -- back to basics

  1. Feb 10, 2015 #1

    naima

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Hi PF

    I am reading an old Rovelli paper http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9603063
    Rovelli computes the entropy of a black hole.
    He says two things.
    a) A state is described with an equivalence class of s-knots.
    b) the entropy of a black hole can be computed by counting the number of the intersection of the horizon and the s-knot (an equivalence class)
    So when he writes :
    Let i = 1...n label such intersections
    What is this n? what is this i labelling?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 12, 2015 #2

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Hi Naima, you are right that it is an old paper! I believe it was preliminary with some gaps still to fill in. As I recall this idea for calculating the entropy was not developed, because about the same time the Ashtekar et al paper came out, with what seemed a more complete analysis. In a later paper with Krasnov, Rovelli spoke of having "discarded" this 1996 approach of his in favor of the one in Ashtekar et al. But it could still be interesting.

    It is a combinatorial approach where one one considers all the partitions of the area number. the number n is the number of terms in the partition.

    Imagine that each leg of a spin network is labeled with an number that can represent an element of area of any surface that leg passes through. The total area is the sum of all those areas of all the legs that "puncture" the surface. It could be a sum of many small terms (large n) or a sum of fewer larger terms (small n).
    The number n can range within wide bounds (for a reasonable sized area).
    http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9603063
    At the moment I cannot recall how he connects that to the entropy. But you asked about the number n, and that I can say is the number of summands in a given partition of the area quantity A.
     
  4. Feb 12, 2015 #3

    naima

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Thank you Marcus.

    As a S-knod is an equivalence class of spin networks does it mean that two such networks have the same number of legs?
    Could you give a more recent paper which gives the LQG description of the Bekenstein area result ?
     
  5. Feb 12, 2015 #4

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Yes, same number of legs. A diffeomorphism can change the embedding, but it would not change the topology of the graph.
    I will try to hunt up some recent papers about LQG treatment of BH.
    I will look for papers by Alejandro Perez
    also by Gambini and Pullin
    also by Eugenio Bianchi
    If someone else happens to read this and can think of other LQG authors who have studied BH entropy, please tell us! I enjoy watching the developments in LQG but I certainly do not qualify as expert and cannot be sure to think of every relevant paper. but let's do the ARXIV.ORG search :D

    Here is an invited review article, to be a chapter in a book edited by Ashtekar and Pullin
    http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.02963
    Quantum Geometry and Black Holes
    J. Fernando Barbero G., Alejandro Perez
    (Submitted on 13 Jan 2015)
    We present an overall picture of the advances in the description of black hole physics from the perspective of loop quantum gravity. After an introduction that discusses the main conceptual issues we present some details about the classical and quantum geometry of isolated horizons and their quantum geometry and then use this scheme to give a natural definition of the entropy of black holes. The entropy computations can be neatly expressed in the form of combinatorial problems solvable with the help of methods based on number theory and the use of generating functions. The recovery of the Bekenstein-Hawking law and corrections to it is explained in some detail. After this, due attention is paid to the discussion of semiclassical issues. An important point in this respect is the proper interpretation of the horizon area as the energy that should appear in the statistical-mechanical treatment of the black hole model presented here. The chapter ends with a comparison between the microscopic and semiclassical approaches to the computation of the entropy and discusses a number of issues regarding the relation between entanglement and statistical entropy and the possibility of comparing the subdominant (logarithmic) corrections to the entropy obtained with the help of the Euclidean path integral with the ones obtained in the present framework.
    39 pages. Contribution to appear in the World Scientific series "100 Years of General Relativity" edited by A. Ashtekar and J. Pullin

    Some additional links:
    http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4563
    Statistics, holography, and black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity
    Amit Ghosh, Karim Noui, Alejandro Perez

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7287
    Statistical and entanglement entropy for black holes in quantum geometry
    Alejandro Perez

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5851
    Black holes as gases of punctures with a chemical potential: Bose-Einstein condensation and logarithmic corrections to the entropy
    Olivier Asin, Jibril Ben Achour, Marc Geiller, Karim Noui, Alejandro Perez

    Naima, my personal opinion is that there is no one unique official way, in LQG, to derive the Bekenstein-Hawking area law for BH entropy. Maybe if you want a "most representative" derivation you could find it in that review article by Perez. However what I also like is that the law is derived in several different ways, sometimes stimulating of different points of view
    http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0522
    Black hole entropy from graviton entanglement
    Eugenio Bianchi
    (Submitted on 2 Nov 2012 (v1), last revised 7 Jan 2013)
    We argue that the entropy of a black hole is due to the entanglement of matter fields and gravitons across the horizon. While the entanglement entropy of the vacuum is divergent because of UV correlations, we show that low-energy perturbations of the vacuum result in a finite change in the entanglement entropy. The change is proportional to the energy flux through the horizon, and equals the change in area of the event horizon divided by 4 times Newton's constant - independently from the number and type of matter fields. The phenomenon is local in nature and applies both to black hole horizons and to cosmological horizons, thus providing a microscopic derivation of the Bekenstein-Hawking area law. The physical mechanism presented relies on the universal coupling of gravitons to the energy-momentum tensor, i.e. on the equivalence principle.
    4 pages

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.5122
    Entropy of Non-Extremal Black Holes from Loop Gravity
    Eugenio Bianchi
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2015
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook