LR Circuit: Book Mistake or Misunderstanding?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the ratio of an inductor's self-induced electromotive force (E(L)) to the battery's electromotive force (E(bat)) in an LR circuit at time t = 2τ. The correct calculation shows that E(L) / E(bat) equals approximately 0.865, derived from the equation i = (E(bat)/R) (1-e^(-t/τ)). The confusion arises from a textbook error that presents the incorrect value of 0.135, which corresponds to the decay equation rather than the rise equation. The participant correctly identifies that R*I represents the voltage across the resistor, not the inductor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of LR circuit dynamics
  • Familiarity with electromotive force (emf) concepts
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their applications in circuit analysis
  • Proficiency in using Kirchhoff's laws for circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of inductors in transient circuits
  • Learn about the derivation of the current rise equation in LR circuits
  • Explore the differences between current rise and decay in electrical circuits
  • Investigate common textbook errors in circuit analysis and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and educators seeking clarity on LR circuit behavior and common misconceptions in textbook explanations.

kahwawashay1
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
problem: switch of LR circuit is closed at time = 0; what is ratio of inductor's self-induced emf ( E(L) ) to battery's emf ( E(bat) ) at t = 2τ?

my solution:
switch is closed so current begins to build up according to equation:
i = (E(bat)/R) (1-e^(-t/τ) )
multiplying R on both sides and plugging in for t = 2τ:
E(L) = E(bat) (1-e^(-2) )

E(L) / E(bat) = 1-e^(-2) ≈ 0.865

But my book says the answer is 0.135, which is just the value of e^(-2), which you would obtain if you used the equation for current decay

i = (E(bat)/R) (e^(-t/τ))

instead of the equation for current rise. But the current in this case is clearly rising. So is my book wrong or am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R*I is not the voltage across the inductor, it's the voltage across the resistor...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K