M 4.8 - Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, US

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earthquake
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a recent earthquake with a magnitude of 4.8 that occurred near Whitehouse Station, New Jersey. Participants share their experiences of the quake, including its effects, duration, and the subsequent response from local authorities. The conversation also touches on the geological context of the event, including potential aftershocks and the characteristics of seismic waves in different environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experiential accounts

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants noted the unusual nature of the earthquake, given its location near the Ramapo fault, which is part of the Appalachian mountain chain.
  • Several individuals described their personal experiences during the quake, with varying perceptions of intensity and duration, ranging from a light rumble to noticeable swaying of buildings.
  • One participant mentioned the amplifying effect of living over an aquifer, which could complicate the identification of the quake's direction.
  • There were reports of confusion regarding the source of the rumbling, with some attributing it to household appliances or external noise before realizing it was an earthquake.
  • Aftershocks were reported, including a magnitude 3.8 event and a smaller 2.5 quake, with updates on their characteristics and geological assessments provided by a Columbia University geologist.
  • Participants expressed varying levels of awareness and recognition of the earthquake at the time it occurred, with some initially mistaking it for other disturbances.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the earthquake was felt to varying degrees, but there is no consensus on the intensity or impact experienced by individuals. Multiple perspectives on the geological implications and personal experiences remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlighted the limitations in identifying the direction of the quake due to local geological conditions, such as low-velocity materials that may refract seismic waves. Additionally, the timing and reporting of aftershocks were noted as evolving aspects of the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals studying seismology, those living in earthquake-prone areas, or anyone curious about the experiences and responses to seismic events.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,515
Reaction score
7,461
Not a terribly strong earthquake, but it is unusual. It is apparently near the Ramapo fault, whih is part of the Appalachian mountain chain as it curves across NJ into NY and CT.

Folks noticed it - and of course, many panicked and called 9-1-1. I have not heard of any injuries or building damage. Airports in the NY area suspended takeoffs and landing to assess the runways, and bridges and tunnels (between NJ and NY) were briefly closed to traffic to ensure they were not damaged.

My wife, son and I did feel it - a few (4 or 5) seconds of rumbling at the house, almost like a heavy truck (or several) rolling by.

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000ma74/executive

M 4.8 - Whitehouse Station, New Jersey Earthquake​

  • 2024-04-05 14:23:20 (UTC)
  • 40.703°N 74.758°W
  • 4.7 km depth
No aftershocks reported, so it appears to be a one-off. It was fairly shallow at 4.7 km. Originally reported at 1 km and 4.8, it was updated to 4.7 Mag, and revised back to 4.8 Mag.

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000ma74/region-info

It took about 7 minutes for the USGS site to post information. It was the first place I went for information.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, BillTre, berkeman and 1 other person
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
My household in Pelham, NH heard it but did not really feel it. We live directly over an aquifer with wetlands on most sides - so there would have been an amplifying effect
I didn't recognize it (at the time) as a quake and tried to determined what direction it came from - without success.
It lasted for about 30 seconds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc
.Scott said:
I didn't recognize it (at the time) as a quake and tried to determined what direction it came from - without success.
My wife wondered if my son was jumping on the floor (he wasn't), I wondered if our heater furnace was having a problem (it wasn't, and it actually wasn't operating until after the quake). Lots of folks started posting on a local Facebook forum, which my wife checks for local news/events. Once USGS posted it's summary, I sent the link to my wife so she could share it.

I've experienced much stronger quakes while visiting California. Ours was much less significant - kind of a light rumble.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/earthquake-felt-42-million-people-160201382.html
 
Astronuc said:
My wife wondered if my son was jumping on the floor (he wasn't), I wondered if our heater furnace was having a problem (it wasn't, and it actually wasn't operating until after the quake).
I was in my bedroom with the laundry room one floor below. If the washing machine is unbalanced when it goes into the spin cycle, it can create a rumble that goes on and off similar what I was hearing - so I was trying to determine if that rumble really was coming from the laundry room. But it didn't seem to be and I thought (correctly) that there was nothing in the washer. The mystery was solved half an hour later when I checked my email and saw the news alert.
 
.Scott said:
We live directly over an aquifer with wetlands on most sides - so there would have been an amplifying effect
I didn't recognize it (at the time) as a quake and tried to determined what direction it came from - without success.
The low velocity material near the surface at your location, not only amplifies the motion, but also refracts the wave, turning the movement upwards, so all quakes will appear to rise steeply from below. That can make identification of direction very confusing and unreliable.
 
Apparently there were two aftershocks.

M 3.8 - 7 km SW of Gladstone, New Jersey​

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000mab9/executive
  • 2024-04-05 21:59:13 (UTC)
  • 40.685°N 74.735°W
  • 8.5 km depth
Note: The magnitude of this earthquake was improved based on more complete physical modeling. The magnitude was changed from 4.0 to 3.8.


M 2.5 - 7 km WSW of Gladstone, New Jersey​

  • 2024-04-06 10:46:39 (UTC)
  • 40.694°N 74.744°W
  • 9.0 km depth
This small quake is the northern most of the three.


Edit/update: https://www.yahoo.com/news/columbia-university-geologists-head-nj-221739521.html

“We knew right away that it was an earthquake,” said Dr. Folarin Kolawole, a Columbia University geologist. “We were looking at ourselves and started screaming. It was amazing.”

. . .

“The goal is to take measurements of, say, hundreds of fractures that I can see and touch and take measurements on,” said Kolawole.

After scouring the area, even while only having two hours of daylight to work with, their trip was a success.

“We were able to find fractures and fault planes, ancient fault planes, in the bedrock that have similar orientations to the one that ruptured the earthquake,” said Kolawole.

Kolawale said more geologists will be back out in Hunterdon County this week.
 

Attachments

  • Mag4.8_WhtiehouseStation_NJ_04052025.png
    Mag4.8_WhtiehouseStation_NJ_04052025.png
    142.6 KB · Views: 121
Last edited:
For the record, some of us most definitely were moved by this earthquake. I was in Summit, NJ at my dentist. Despite my reclining in a chair, I felt the building detectably sway (or roll like a particle on the ocean surface?). At first, it was more like truck or construction noise with a strong vibration, but it increased to perceived motion beyond "vibration", affecting balance sensation slightly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
741
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K