Astronuc said:
. The displacement could have been lateral, instead of vertical, and there was no apparent underwater slide, or if there was, it was away from Mindanao.
Maybe @davenn can comment.
jedishrfu said:
1. Detection of an Undersea Earthquake: A warning may be issued if an undersea earthquake of significant magnitude (typically 7.5 or higher) is detected, particularly in areas known for producing tsunamis.
hi guys,
yes, tho this was a thrust fault, which are the ones that cause most tsunamis, at M6.8, it's well below the magnitude of what would normally cause a tsunami. below the "beachball focal mechanism for the 6.8
main shock. It is mostly thrust ( reverse faulting) with a very small component of strike-slip. Hence why the blue area is offset vertically. With north at the top, the thrust direction was to the WNW ( roughly in a line between the P and the T.
That M7.5 mentioned above is a pretty good guideline for quake size and tsunami generation.
I only recall one M7 quake that produced a significant tsunami. It was on the north coast of New Guinea
On July 17, 1998, a 7.0 magnitude (Mw) earthquake struck the island of Papua New Guinea at 5:49 p.m.
local time.
PNG quake and tsunami
With an up to 15m of run-up. It has been suggested, for various reasons, that the 7.0 triggered an
under-sea land slide that caused a large water colum offset to produce the tsunami.
That article covers it well.
cheers
Dave