Magnetic Circuit with diferent section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a magnetic circuit problem involving two ferromagnetic cores in series, with specific parameters: core lengths of 40 cm and 10 cm, relative permeabilities of μr1 = 1000 and μr2 = 2000, cross-sectional areas S1 = 1 cm² and S2 = 1.5 cm², a current of I = 2A, and N = 200 turns. The magnetic flux is calculated using Ampère's Law, resulting in a value of B = 1.12 T. The participant expresses confusion regarding the boundary conditions and the consistency of magnetic flux across different sections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic circuits and ferromagnetic materials
  • Familiarity with Ampère's Law and its applications
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in magnetic fields
  • Ability to perform calculations involving magnetic flux and permeability
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Ampère's Law in complex magnetic circuits
  • Learn about boundary conditions in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the implications of magnetic flux continuity across different materials
  • Explore the concept of magnetic reluctance and its calculation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, magnetic circuit design, and magnetic field analysis.

libelec
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the following magnetic circuit:
2uh9yzn.jpg

It's constituted by two cores in serie. The first one has an average length of 40 cm and the second of 10 cm. Both are made of ferromagnetic material, which can be considered lineal and with \mur1 = 1000 for the first one, and \mur2 = 2000 for the second one. Additionally S1= 1 cm2, S2 = 1,5 cm2, I = 2A and N = 200.

1) Find the magnetic flux.
2) Find the length of each of the 3 vectors in each material, and indicate their direction.


Homework Equations



1- Boundary conditions: B1n (the magnetic field in the first core) = B2n.

2- \mathop{{\int\!\!\!\!\!\int}\mkern-21mu \bigcirc}\limits_S <br /> {\vec B \cdot d\vec s = 0}

3- Extention of Ampère's Law: \oint\limits_C {\vec H \cdot d\vec l} = NI

4- Since we are considering the materials lineal: \vec B = \mu \vec H


The Attempt at a Solution



First of all, I know that because of the canalization effect, B (and therefore H) is going to be as parallel as possible to the circuit. So, except in the corners, B is parallel to the circuit's "walls". I also know that B, H and M outside the circuit are equal to zero.

Well, the first thing I thought was using the extention of Ampère's Law. Since I don't know exactly how to find a curve C that best fits the situation, but I'm given the average length for each core, I guess it doesn't matter. So:

\oint\limits_C {\vec H \cdot d\vec l = \int\limits_{\mu _1 } {\vec H_1 \cdot d\vec l} } + \int\limits_{\mu _2 } {\vec H_2 \cdot d\vec l} = H_1 .0,4m + H_2 .0,1m = NI

Then, because of the boundary condition (2), B_{\mu _1 n} = B_{\mu _2 n}. But because in both boundaries both B_{\mu _1 } and B_{\mu _2 } are normal to the contact surface, then B_{\mu _1 } = B_{\mu _2 } = B.

Using the relation (4): \frac{{B_{\mu _1 } }}{{\mu _1 }} = H_1 and \frac{{B_{\mu _2 } }}{{\mu _2 }} = H_2.

Replacing this into the first equation: \frac{B}{{\mu _1 }}.0,4m + \frac{B}{{\mu _2 }}.0,1m = B\left( {\frac{{0,4m}}{{\mu _1 }} + \frac{{0,1m}}{{\mu _2 }}} \right) = NI. Then I find that B = \frac{{NI}}{{\left( {\frac{{0,4m}}{{\mu _1 }} + \frac{{0,1m}}{{\mu _2 }}} \right)}} = 1,12T.

The thing is that I think this is wrong, because then I will find one flux for the section S1 and another for the section S2. Also, I wouldn't satisfy condition (2).

But if I begin using that condition, I find that B_{\mu _1 } = B_{\mu _2 } .1,5<br />, which violates the boundary condition (1) (MathType doesn't let me copypaste any double integrals, but this comes from calculating the magnetic flux through a close surface S that includes both sections S1 and S2).

What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody, please?
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K