Magnetic energy inside a coaxial cable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic energy stored within a coaxial cable, specifically focusing on the magnetic field behavior in different regions defined by the inner and outer radii. Participants are exploring the application of Ampere's law to determine the magnetic field in these regions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the magnetic field equations for different regions of the coaxial cable and express uncertainty about how to apply the energy formula given the varying magnetic fields. There are questions regarding the correctness of the energy calculations and the definitions of the regions involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to integrate the magnetic field expressions over the defined regions, and there is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the calculations. Multiple interpretations of the regions and their corresponding magnetic fields are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the definitions of the regions and the constants involved in the energy calculations. Participants are also addressing potential discrepancies in units and factors in their equations, indicating a need for careful consideration of the setup and assumptions made in the problem.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Magnetic energy inside a coaxial cable
Relevant Equations
##E_b = \frac{1}{2\mu_0} \int\int\int B^2 dv##
Hi,

I have to find the magnetic energy inside a coaxial cable of inner radius ##a## and outer radium ##b##, ##I = I##

By using Ampere's law
if ##r<a##
##B = \frac{\mu_0Ir}{2\pi a^2}##

if ##a<r<b##
##B = \frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r}##

if ##r>b##
##B = 0##

Then, the energy in a magnetic field ##E_b = \frac{1}{2\mu_0} \int\int\int B^2 dv##

Since I have 2 different ##B## inside the cable, I'm not sure how to use this formula.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your fields inside and out have different units. You should worry.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
hutchphd said:
Your fields inside and out have different units. You should worry.
I'm not sure to understand. Of course the fields inside and out have different units since ##B = 0## if ##r>b##
Is ##E_{tot} = E_{b1} + E_{b2}##

For example,
if ##a<r<b## and for a length = l
##E_{b1} = \frac{\mu_0 I^2 l}{4\pi} \cdot ln\frac{b}{a}##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see you have corrected it. Good.
 
hutchphd said:
I see you have corrected it. Good.
All right, but is it correct to say that ##E_{tot} = E_{b1} + E_{b2}##
 
What is ##b_1## ? ##b_2##? You need the integral as defined (notice ##B^2##). You will need to divide up the integral and use the value for B in each region.
 
I have to find the energy stored by the magnetic field.

##b_1## is the magnetic field where ##r<a## and ##b_2## is the magnetic field where ##a<r<b##

So, I would like to know If I have to find ##E_b## in each region?
 
Oh, I see, yes you do. So there will be two (easy) integrals one for each region. You've already done the in between ...did you do r<a yet?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: happyparticle
You have also called the regions several different ways! And look at he constants in the energy.
 
  • #10
hutchphd said:
You have also called the regions several different ways! And look at he constants in the energy.
I didn't notice, sorry.

Thus,
##E_{tot} = \frac{\mu_0 I^2 L}{4\pi}(\frac{1}{4} + ln(\frac{b}{a}))##

Does it makes sense?

##r<a##
##E_{b2} = \frac{\mu_0 I^2 L}{16\pi} ##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
I think the units are correct (## \mu_0 ## is Henrys /m ) . Check the r<a it seems off by a factor of 2 to me.
 
  • #12
Yeah I guess its right...up to you now!
 
  • #13
All right, so my ##r<a## is not off by a factor of 4?
 
  • #14
My original objection was incorrect. I haven't looked at this problem before and the 1/4 seems weird to me but I don't see anything wrong so call it good.
 
  • #15
All right, I trust you more than I trust myself.

Thanks!
 
  • #16
When it comes to Algebra, probably not a good decision on your part.
 
  • #17

EDIT: sorry about the mix-up.

What you are describing is not a coax cable. Looks like it's just the outer conductor of a coax cable.
Assuming that and a current flowing through the conductor, use Ampere's law as you describe for a<r<b, then your volume integral.
(Question to you: what is the field 0<r<a?). An easy integration (think cylindrical coordinales).
Don't know what all the E fields are doing in the foregoing posts.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
708
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K