Magnetic Field around a dipole calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the magnetic field around a dipole, specifically the transition from equation 8.20 to equation 8.21a in the book "Elements of Electromagnetics." The user initially attempted to substitute d[FONT="Arial Black"]l=a.d∅.[FONT="Arial Black"]a∅ and integrate ∅ from 0 to 2π, resulting in an incorrect expression for A. The user acknowledges the assumption that r >> a may be crucial for the correct derivation, indicating a need for further clarification on this approximation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic dipole theory
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of the Biot-Savart law
  • Proficiency in electromagnetic field equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the magnetic field from dipole moments
  • Review the assumptions in electromagnetic approximations, specifically r >> a
  • Explore the application of the Biot-Savart law in dipole calculations
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for integrating vector fields in cylindrical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and magnetic field calculations.

crystalbrite
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've attached a page from the book Elements of Electromagnetics.

I was wondering how he gets from eq.8.20 to eq.8.21a.

What I would have done is sub in dl=a.d∅.a∅ and integrate ∅ between 0 and 2pi.

This would then give you A=[(2.μ0.I.pi.a)/(4.pi.r)].a

This is obviously wrong because it's not what he got. He does make an assumption that r>>a so maybe i have to do something with that.

Any help would be much appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i forgot the attachment
 

Attachments

  • electromagnetics page.jpg
    electromagnetics page.jpg
    28.6 KB · Views: 470
Its ok, i found the explanation in a book on google books. Its a bit long and tedious.

I guess no one here would be able to understand it which is why i got no reply. Oh well...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K