Magnetic Field due to long wire?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the magnetic field at a point due to a long straight wire carrying a current, specifically focusing on contributions from different segments of the wire. The original poster attempts to determine the distance to the segment that contributes the most to the magnetic field and another segment that contributes a specific percentage of that maximum contribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Biot-Savart Law and the setup of an integral to find contributions to the magnetic field. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the greatest contribution and how to calculate a percentage of it.

Discussion Status

Some participants clarify that the goal is to compare contributions from different segments rather than finding a total magnetic field value. There is ongoing exploration of how to approach the calculation for the segment contributing 10.5% of the maximum contribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of determining contributions without needing a numerical value for the magnetic field at the closest segment. There is an emphasis on understanding the ratios of contributions from different segments.

Destroxia
Messages
204
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



In the figure, point P is at perpendicular distance R = 2.32 cm from a very long straight wire carrying a current. The magnetic field B set up at point P is due to contributions from all the identical current-length elements ids along the wire. What is the distance s to the element making (a) the greatest contribution to field B and (b)10.5% of the greatest contribution?

2rm5nkm.png


Homework Equations



Biot- Savart Law = u0/4pi * (ids*sin(theta))/(r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to set up an integration using the biot savart law and came up with something along the lines of,

u0*i*R/(4pi) = ∫(-inf/inf) ds/(R^2+ s^2)^(3/2)

I solved (a) simply because I figured the strongest point of the magnetic field must be at the point closes to point P, the answer was 0, therefore.

I don't understand (b), if 0 is the greatest contribution, 10.5% of the greatest contribution would also be 0... Yet it is not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK for (a).

Let dBmax be the contribution from the current element that contributes the most. Part (b) is asking for the distance s for an element that contributes 10.5% of dBmax.
 
TSny said:
OK for (a).

Let dBmax be the contribution from the current element that contributes the most. Part (b) is asking for the distance s for an element that contributes 10.5% of dBmax.

So, essentially, I'm just finding the total B, taking 10.5% of that, and solving for the distance in the biot-savart law?
 
No, you do not need to find the total B. You are just comparing the contributions dB from individual segments (elements). In part (a) you considered the segment that produces the maximum dB. As you noted, this is the segment at s = 0. In (b) you want to find a segment that contributes a dB which is 10.5% of the amount contributed by the segment at s = 0.
 
TSny said:
No, you do not need to find the total B. You are just comparing the contributions dB from individual segments (elements). In part (a) you considered the segment that produces the maximum dB. As you noted, this is the segment at s = 0. In (b) you want to find a segment that contributes a dB which is 10.5% of the amount contributed by the segment at s = 0.

I guess I just meant, do I need to find the B at s = 0 then? If I don't, how would I find 10.5% of s = 0, If I don't know the value for that point?
 
You do not need to find a numerical value for the infinitesimal magnetic field, dB, produced at P by the element Ids located at s = 0. That would require knowing I and ds.

Think about the ratio of dB produced by two different current elements located at different values of s.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K