Magnetic field of a rotating disk with a non-uniform volume charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the magnetic field of a rotating disk with a non-uniform volume charge, as introduced in a classical electrodynamics course. Key equations include Ampere's law, represented as ## \nabla \times \vec{B} = \mu_{0} \vec{J} ##, and the Laplace equation for cylindrical coordinates, ## \nabla^{2} \vec{B} = 0 ## outside the disk. The user explores methods such as the Greens function method and emphasizes the need for boundary conditions derived from the equation ## \nabla^{2} \vec{B} = -\mu_{0} \nabla \times \vec{J}_{f} ## inside the disk. Suggestions for further exploration include Stokes' Theorem and cylindrical symmetry to simplify the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electrodynamics principles, particularly Ampere's law.
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates and their applications in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of the Laplace equation and its boundary conditions.
  • Basic understanding of the Greens function method in solving differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Greens function method in detail, focusing on its application in electromagnetism.
  • Learn how to solve the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates, including boundary conditions.
  • Explore Stokes' Theorem and its implications for vector calculus in electromagnetism.
  • Investigate cylindrical symmetry and its role in simplifying magnetic field calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate students in physics, particularly those studying classical electrodynamics, as well as educators and researchers looking for insights into solving complex electromagnetic problems.

Light bulB 6626
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider a thin disk ( ## d \ll R ## , with thickness ## d ## and radius ## R ## ), with volume

charge distributed as ## \rho_{f}=k(R-s)(d-z)^{2} ## , where ## s=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} ## and the coordinate origin ## (x, y, z)=(0,0,0) ## is at the center of the disk. (The ## z ## axis is normal to the circular bases of disk). When this disk rotates around
the ## z ## axis with angular speed ## \omega, ## answer the following questions:

(a) Find the free current density ## \vec{J}_{f} ##

(b) Show that ## \nabla^{2} \vec{B}=-\mu_{0} \nabla \times \vec{J}_{f} ## is satisfied in this case.

(c) Using (b), find ## \vec{B} ## near the disk, at ## z \simeq d / 2 \ll R ##
Relevant Equations
## \nabla^{2} \vec{B}=0 ## (outside the disk).
## \nabla^{2} \vec{B}=-\mu_{0} \nabla \times \vec{J}_{f} ## (inside the disk)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was a problem introduced during my classical electrodynamics course.
I am not 100% sure, but I think I've solved up to problems (a) and (b) as below.
(Note that I tried to follow the notations in Introduction to Electrodynamics (Griffiths) :(a) We use cylindrical coordinates ## (s, \phi, z) ## , with unit vectors ## \hat{r}, \hat{\phi}, \hat{z} ## .
## \vec{J}_{f} = \vec{J} = \rho \vec{v} = \rho s w \hat{\phi} ## .

## \therefore \vec{J}_{f}=k(R-s)(d-z)^{2} \rho s w \hat{\phi} ##

(*I am not absolutely sure whether ## \vec{J}_{f} = \vec{J}=\vec{J}_{f}+\vec{J}_{b}+\vec{J}_{p} ## holds in this problem.)

(b) ## \nabla \times \vec{B} = \mu_{0} \vec{J} ## (Ampere's law)

## \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0 ##
( ## \because ## there are no magnetic monopoles)

## \nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec{B}) = - \nabla^{2} \vec{B} + \nabla (\nabla \cdot \vec{B})=- \nabla^{2} \vec{B} ##

## \therefore \nabla^{2} \vec{B}=-\mu_{0} \nabla \times \vec{J}_{f} ##*****************************************************************

> I have been pondering on question (c) for more than a full day, but I couldn't get a clear solution. Here are some of my (partial) attempts:

1. **Laplace equation for cylindrical coordinates**.

## \nabla^{2} \vec{B}=0 ## (outside the disk).Solve the Laplace equation for components of ## B ## , with boundary conditions obtained from

## \nabla^{2} \vec{B}=-\mu_{0} \nabla \times \vec{J}_{f} ## (inside the disk)

> I haven't tried this approach since because I am not familiar with solving Laplace equations for cylindrical coordinates, (also, the calculations seemed too tedious and complicated for the problem.)

2. Greens function method.

(I am not familiar with this method, but a friend of mine (a graduate from my school) advised me this method. I do not perfectly understand the Greens function method, but I was able to come up with this formula, using **some analogies** (with ## V ## and ## \vec{A} ## ) from Introduction to Electrodynamics* (Griffiths).## \nabla^{2} V=-\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} ## ## \Longrightarrow ##
## V(\mathbf{r})=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int \frac{\rho\left(\mathbf{r}^{\prime}\right)}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}^{\prime}|} d \tau^{\prime} ##

## \nabla^{2} \mathbf{A}=-\mu_{0}\mathbf{J} ##
## \Longrightarrow ## ## \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r})=\frac{\mu_{0}}{4 \pi} \int \frac{\mathbf{J}\left(\mathbf{r}^{\prime}\right)}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}^{\prime}|} d \tau^{\prime} ##

Therefore
## \nabla^{2} \mathbf{B}=-\mu_{0} \nabla \times \mathbf{J}_{f} ##
## \Longrightarrow ##
## \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r})=\frac{\mu_{0}}{4 \pi} \int \frac{(\nabla \times \mathbf{J}_{f})\left(\mathbf{r}^{\prime}\right)}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}^{\prime}|} d \tau^{\prime} ##

I have tried this method, but was unable to proceed since the integral (if my calculations were correct) involved an elliptic integral. I tried to use the approximation ## z \simeq d / 2 \ll R ## to simplify the integral (- expanding it using the taylor expansion, then keeping terms upto order 1), but couldn't find a subtle arrangement of terms.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am a undergraduate, and I am still learning/practicing how to approach these kind of problems. Any suggestions about solving the problem welcome. I would be very grateful if some kind user will provide a solution/ or a detailed advice for problem (c). Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might look at Stokes Theorem. The ##\nabla^2\mathbf{B}## clearly has to point along ##z## so look at the area integral in the xy plane. Not sure this will get you much but the lhs of (b) was made for this kind of thing.

P.S. you can also use cylindrical symmetry. This screams make the area integrated a disk of radius ##s## for any value of ##s##.

[edit] because ##\rho(s,z)##, ##\nabla^2\mathbf{B}## will also have a ##\hat{s}## component.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K