Magnetic field on current loop, involves rotational energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rectangular loop pivoting about a fixed axis in a magnetic field, focusing on the relationship between potential and kinetic energy as the loop rotates. The loop's dimensions, current, magnetic field strength, and moment of inertia are specified, with an initial angle provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinetic and potential energy equations to find angular velocity. Some question the treatment of potential energy at different angles and the signs in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, identifying mistakes in their reasoning and clarifying the correct expressions for potential energy. There is a recognition of the need to correctly account for initial and final states in energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the correct interpretation of potential energy in relation to the magnetic field and the loop's orientation, with some participants noting the absence of initial kinetic energy due to the loop starting from rest.

cdingdong
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rectangular loop of sides a = 0.3 cm and b = 0.8 cm pivots without friction about a fixed axis (z-axis) that coincides with its left end (see figure). The net current in the loop is I = 3.2 A. A spatially uniform magnetic field with B = 0.005 T points in the +y-direction. The loop initially makes an angle q = 35° with respect to the x-z plane.
https://tycho-s.phys.washington.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?courses/phys122/autumn08/homework/09/rectangular_loop_MFR/p8.gif

The moment of inertia of the loop about its axis of rotation (left end) is J = 2.9 × 10-6 kg m2. If the loop is released from rest at q = 35°, calculate its angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex] at q = 0°.

Homework Equations



this is kinetic energy:
KE = 1/2I[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] but moment of inertia is specified to be J, so

KE = 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex]

this is potential energy for a loop with current and magnetic field acting on it:
PE = [tex]\mu[/tex]Bcos[tex]\theta[/tex]
moment vector [tex]\mu[/tex] = NIA where N = number of loops, I = current, A = area, B = magnetic field

so, PE = NIABcos[tex]\theta[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I recognize that the angular kinetic energy equation can be used to find the angular velocity. KE = 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex].
Final kinetic energy = initial potential energy. Initial potential energy = NIABcos[tex]\theta[/tex]. so, we could say

1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] = NIABcos[tex]\theta[/tex]

the right side is potential energy. that equals

N = 1 turn; I = 3.2 Amps; A = 0.003*0.008 = 2.5e-5 meters; B = 0.005 Teslas; [tex]\theta[/tex] = 35 degrees

(1)(3.2)(2.5e-5)(0.005)cos(35) = 3.276608177 * 10^-7 Joules. we'll call this 3.2766e-7
so, now we have

1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] = 3.2766e-7

J = 2.9 × 10-6 kilogram meters squared. we'll call this 2.9e-6

1/2(2.9e-6)[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] = 3.2766e-7

[tex]\omega[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{(2*3.2766e-7)/2.9e-6}[/tex] = 4.753655581 * 10^-1

BUT, the answer happens to be what I did except that they did not take the square root at the end.
so, they got 2.259724138 * 10^-1.

did i do something wrong? what i did makes sense in my mind. is their answer wrong? why did they not not take a square root at the end? is kinetic energy not = 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex], but instead 1/2J[tex]\omega[/tex] without the square?

i thank everybody in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
cdingdong said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I recognize that the angular kinetic energy equation can be used to find the angular velocity. KE = 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex].
Final kinetic energy = initial potential energy. Initial potential energy = NIABcos[tex]\theta[/tex]. so, we could say

1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] = NIABcos[tex]\theta[/tex]
What's the final potential energy, when θ = 0?
 
wow, now that you bring it up, i realize my mistake. you're right! i forgot the final potential energy. so, the answer works, but there is something that bothers me.

Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf

there is no initial kinetic energy because it came from rest, so that is zero

Ui = Kf + Uf

rearranging it,

Ui - Uf = Kf

NIABcos35 - NIABcos0 = 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex]

NIAB(cos35 - cos0) = 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex]

(1)(3.2)(2.5e-5)(0.005)(cos35 - cos0) = 1/2(2.9e-5)[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex]

-7.233918228 = 1/2(2.9e-5)[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex]

when i find the potential energy, initial PE - final PE, i get a negative number. so, when i set it equal to 1/2J[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex], i get a square root of a negative number, which is not possible. if i take the square root of the absolute value of that number, the answer is correct. is there something wrong with my signs?
 
cdingdong said:
is there something wrong with my signs?
Yes, your signs are messed up. The correct expression for PE is PE = -IABcosθ (note the minus sign).

So Ui - Uf = (-IABcos35) - (-IABcos0) = IAB(cos0 - cos35).
 
ahhhh, i see. well, that will solve my problem. thanks Doc Al!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K