Understanding Torque in a Magnetic Field with Loop

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding torque in a magnetic field, specifically relating to a loop of current. Participants are examining the relationship between the magnetic field direction, the normal to the loop, and the angle used in the torque equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the definitions of angles in relation to the magnetic field and the loop's normal. Questions arise about the interpretation of the angle between the magnetic field and the loop normal, as well as the representation of directions in diagrams.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the relationships between the magnetic field, the loop's orientation, and the torque equation. Some participants are providing clarifications and questioning assumptions, while others are seeking confirmation on specific interpretations of the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the problem's wording, including the definitions of "horizontal" and "vertical" in the context of the Earth's surface. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the representation of angles in diagrams.

  • #31
haruspex said:
Actually that line doesn't make sense either. The LHS is a current element but the RHS is a current times a length element.
I meant
##Idl = (I(-rsin\theta d\theta), Ircos\theta d\theta, 0)##

unsure why dl has to be in terms of r and ##\theta##
if so, does ##\vec dl = rd\theta (-\vec i + \vec j)##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
haruspex said:
That integral makes no sense. You show dl as the integration variable but the range seems to be for an angle. Write it all in terms of ##r, \theta## instead of l and perform that cross product.
dI = (dx, dy, 0) = ##(-rsin\theta d\theta), rcos\theta d\theta, 0)##
where x = ##rcos\theta## and y = ##rsin\theta##
 
  • #33
annamal said:
why dl has to be in terms of r and θ
So that you can do the integral.
annamal said:
if so, does ##\vec dl = rd\theta (-\vec i + \vec j)##
No, it is what you wrote,
annamal said:
##(-rsin\theta d\theta, rcos\theta d\theta, 0)##
Now substitute that for ##\vec{dl}## in ##\vec F = \int_{\theta=0}^{2\pi} I\vec{dl} \times \vec B##, and replace ##\vec B## there using ##\vec B = (0, B_y, -B_z)##. Then perform the cross product, then perform the integration.
 
  • #34
haruspex said:
So that you can do the integral.

No, it is what you wrote,

Now substitute that for ##\vec{dl}## in ##\vec F = \int_{\theta=0}^{2\pi} I\vec{dl} \times \vec B##, and replace ##\vec B## there using ##\vec B = (0, B_y, -B_z)##. Then perform the cross product, then perform the integration.
Ok, so ##(-Irsin\theta d\theta, Ircos\theta d\theta, 0) \times (0, B_y, -B_z) = \vec dF = (-IB_z rcos\theta d\theta, -IB_z rsin\theta d\theta, -IB_y rsin\theta d\theta)##
##\vec F = (-IB_z rsin\theta, IB_z rcos\theta, IB_y rcos\theta)## from 0 to ##2\pi## = 0?
 
  • #35
annamal said:
Ok, so ##(-Irsin\theta d\theta, Ircos\theta d\theta, 0) \times (0, B_y, -B_z) = \vec dF = (-IB_z rcos\theta d\theta, -IB_z rsin\theta d\theta, -IB_y rsin\theta d\theta)##
##\vec F = (-IB_z rsin\theta, IB_z rcos\theta, IB_y rcos\theta)## from 0 to ##2\pi## = 0?
Ok, so you found the net force is zero. But we don't care about the net force, we care about the net torque. So find the torque on an element and then integrate.
 
  • #36
haruspex said:
Ok, so you found the net force is zero. But we don't care about the net force, we care about the net torque. So find the torque on an element and then integrate.
What do you mean by that
##\vec r \times \vec F = (rcos\theta, rsin\theta, 0) \times (0, 0, 0)## = 0?
 
  • #37
annamal said:
What do you mean by that
##\vec r \times \vec F = (rcos\theta, rsin\theta, 0) \times (0, 0, 0)## = 0?
No, ##\vec r=\vec r(\theta)##, so you have to find the torque on an element of the loop and then integrate.
##\tau=\int \vec r\times\vec F.d\theta##.
 
  • #38
haruspex said:
No, ##\vec r=\vec r(\theta)##, so you have to find the torque on an element of the loop and then integrate.
##\tau=\int \vec r\times\vec F.d\theta##.
Ok, I get it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
962
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K