Understanding Torque in a Magnetic Field with Loop

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of torque in a magnetic field involving a current-carrying loop. The torque equation is defined as ##\tau = -IABsin\theta##, where ##I## is the current, ##A## is the area of the loop, and ##B## is the magnetic field strength. The angle ##\theta## is critical, with participants clarifying that it is 135 degrees between the loop's normal and the magnetic field, leading to a torque calculation of approximately -0.666. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of visualizing the vectors involved and understanding the orientation of the loop in relation to the magnetic field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque in physics, specifically the equation ##\tau = -IABsin\theta##.
  • Familiarity with magnetic fields and their representation in vector form.
  • Knowledge of current flow in loops and the concept of magnetic moment.
  • Ability to visualize 3D orientations and angles in physics problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the torque equation in different scenarios.
  • Learn about the magnetic moment of current loops and its implications in magnetic fields.
  • Explore visual aids and simulations for understanding vector orientations in magnetic fields.
  • Investigate Fleming's Left Hand Rule and its application in determining torque direction.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electromagnetism or studying the behavior of current-carrying loops in magnetic fields.

  • #31
haruspex said:
Actually that line doesn't make sense either. The LHS is a current element but the RHS is a current times a length element.
I meant
##Idl = (I(-rsin\theta d\theta), Ircos\theta d\theta, 0)##

unsure why dl has to be in terms of r and ##\theta##
if so, does ##\vec dl = rd\theta (-\vec i + \vec j)##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
haruspex said:
That integral makes no sense. You show dl as the integration variable but the range seems to be for an angle. Write it all in terms of ##r, \theta## instead of l and perform that cross product.
dI = (dx, dy, 0) = ##(-rsin\theta d\theta), rcos\theta d\theta, 0)##
where x = ##rcos\theta## and y = ##rsin\theta##
 
  • #33
annamal said:
why dl has to be in terms of r and θ
So that you can do the integral.
annamal said:
if so, does ##\vec dl = rd\theta (-\vec i + \vec j)##
No, it is what you wrote,
annamal said:
##(-rsin\theta d\theta, rcos\theta d\theta, 0)##
Now substitute that for ##\vec{dl}## in ##\vec F = \int_{\theta=0}^{2\pi} I\vec{dl} \times \vec B##, and replace ##\vec B## there using ##\vec B = (0, B_y, -B_z)##. Then perform the cross product, then perform the integration.
 
  • #34
haruspex said:
So that you can do the integral.

No, it is what you wrote,

Now substitute that for ##\vec{dl}## in ##\vec F = \int_{\theta=0}^{2\pi} I\vec{dl} \times \vec B##, and replace ##\vec B## there using ##\vec B = (0, B_y, -B_z)##. Then perform the cross product, then perform the integration.
Ok, so ##(-Irsin\theta d\theta, Ircos\theta d\theta, 0) \times (0, B_y, -B_z) = \vec dF = (-IB_z rcos\theta d\theta, -IB_z rsin\theta d\theta, -IB_y rsin\theta d\theta)##
##\vec F = (-IB_z rsin\theta, IB_z rcos\theta, IB_y rcos\theta)## from 0 to ##2\pi## = 0?
 
  • #35
annamal said:
Ok, so ##(-Irsin\theta d\theta, Ircos\theta d\theta, 0) \times (0, B_y, -B_z) = \vec dF = (-IB_z rcos\theta d\theta, -IB_z rsin\theta d\theta, -IB_y rsin\theta d\theta)##
##\vec F = (-IB_z rsin\theta, IB_z rcos\theta, IB_y rcos\theta)## from 0 to ##2\pi## = 0?
Ok, so you found the net force is zero. But we don't care about the net force, we care about the net torque. So find the torque on an element and then integrate.
 
  • #36
haruspex said:
Ok, so you found the net force is zero. But we don't care about the net force, we care about the net torque. So find the torque on an element and then integrate.
What do you mean by that
##\vec r \times \vec F = (rcos\theta, rsin\theta, 0) \times (0, 0, 0)## = 0?
 
  • #37
annamal said:
What do you mean by that
##\vec r \times \vec F = (rcos\theta, rsin\theta, 0) \times (0, 0, 0)## = 0?
No, ##\vec r=\vec r(\theta)##, so you have to find the torque on an element of the loop and then integrate.
##\tau=\int \vec r\times\vec F.d\theta##.
 
  • #38
haruspex said:
No, ##\vec r=\vec r(\theta)##, so you have to find the torque on an element of the loop and then integrate.
##\tau=\int \vec r\times\vec F.d\theta##.
Ok, I get it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
816
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K