B Magnetic field produced by an electric current

AI Thread Summary
An alternating electric current through a straight conductor generates a magnetic field in an orthogonal plane, with the field's intensity being proportional to the current rather than the conductor's material. While different materials, such as graphene, can affect the efficiency of the circuit and current distribution, they do not change the magnetic field's strength if the current remains constant. The magnetic field depends on the total number of electric charges in motion per unit time, regardless of their speed or the material used. Therefore, if the same current is maintained while switching materials, the magnetic field remains unchanged. The key takeaway is that the magnetic field is directly proportional to the current flowing through the conductor.
arivel
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone .
if an alternating electric current passes through a piece of straight conducting wire, a proportional magnetic field appears on the orthogonal plane.
what happens to the magnetic field if instead of copper, as a conductor, I use different materials with particular characteristics?. I'm interested in knowing if the intensity of the field increases or stays that way.
let's take graphene as an example, in this material the speed of the electrons is much higher.
Thank you .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The external magnetic field is dependent on the flow of current, not on the nature of the conductive material.

The conductive material determines the efficiency of the electrical circuit that sources and maintains the current. The material may influence the current distribution, within a bulky conductor. That may slightly change the field when compared to a filamentary current.
 
In particular, if you have a given current density it produces the same magnetic field regardless of whether that represents a large charge density moving slowly or a small charge density moving quickly.
 
so if I understand correctly it depends only on the total number of electric charges in motion?
 
arivel said:
so if I understand correctly it depends only on the total number of electric charges in motion?
As long as by "number in motion" you mean "number passing a point per unit time", yes. This can be achieved with different numbers of mobile electrons moving with different speeds.

So if you set up some current then switch materials and adjust your power source to get the same current the magnetic field will be the same as will the number of electrons passing any point, but the total number of electrons in motion and their speeds may be different.
 
One electron has a negative charge of 1.602×10−19 coulomb.
So it takes 6.2415×1018 electrons to make one coulomb of charge.
When one coulomb of charge flows past in one second, the current is one ampere.
The magnetic field is proportional to the current.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top