Magnetic Field required to maintain protons at 7Tev in LHC

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field required to maintain protons at 7 TeV in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) with a radius of 27 km. Key equations include the energy-momentum relation and the formula for radius in terms of momentum, charge, and magnetic field. Participants emphasize the necessity of considering relativistic effects and using total energy rather than kinetic energy for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the invariant mass and its relationship to energy in high-energy physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics and energy-momentum relations
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz force and centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and their role in particle accelerators
  • Basic proficiency in algebra and physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy-momentum relation in special relativity
  • Learn about the Lorentz force and its application in particle motion
  • Research the principles of cyclotron motion and its frequency calculations
  • Explore the design and operational principles of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and engineers involved in accelerator design and operation will benefit from this discussion.

Steel_Panther
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Piece of homework I am stuck on. I have to calculate the magnetic field required to maintain protons at 7Tev in the LHC which has a radius of 27 km. I also have to work out the cyclotron frequency as well.

Homework Equations



7 x 10^15 = mc^2/√(1-v^2/c^2) - mc^2 ----(1)

R = mv/qB ----(2) Where R is radius, q is charge and B is the magnetic field

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to work out the velocity of the protons using the first equation as I am sure with that amount of energy I need to take relativity into account. I could then input that into equation 2, but with there being relativistic effects wouldn't these effects on m have to be taken into account? I am not sure if I am going the correct way about tackling this. Any thoughts? Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to PF.

Yes, you will need to include relativistic effects for R. If you write R in the form R = p/qB where p is the momentum, then it will be valid for both relativistic and nonrelativistic cases.

There's a well-known equation that relates energy and momentum that will make it easy to find p.
 
Steel_Panther said:
have tried to work out the velocity of the protons using the first equation as I am sure with that amount of energy I need to take relativity into account.
The energy given is typically the total energy, not just the kinetic energy. Also, it's best to avoid working with speeds if you can. Stick with energy and momentum.

I could then input that into equation 2, but with there being relativistic effects wouldn't these effects on m have to be taken into account? I'm not sure if I am going the correct way about tackling this. Any thoughts? Thanks guys
You should disabuse yourself of the notion that the mass of an object increases with its speed. The only difference between the relativistic mass, which is what you're referring to, and the energy is a factor of c2, so you might as well just refer to the particle's energy. It's the energy that increases with speed, and the mass m is the invariant, or rest, mass, which is constant.
 
vela said:
The energy given is typically the total energy, not just the kinetic energy.

Good point. I've seen "energy given" used both ways (KE or total). [EDIT: In a low energy situation it might seem a bit strange for the given energy to be the total energy; e.g., a "1-Gev proton"]. In this problem it won't make much difference.
 
At that energy, the protons are essentially moving at the speed of light (E_k \gg m_p c^2). The equation for perpendicular acceleration is:
<br /> a_{\bot} = \frac{c^2}{E} \, F_{\bot}<br />

The Lorentz force is a perpendicular force. Do you know the expression for centripetal acceleration and Lorentz force?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K