Magnetic field strength of a stack of magnets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the magnetic field strength of stacked cylindrical neodymium magnets, specifically using the formula $$ B(z)=\frac{μ_0M}{2}(\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}-\frac{z-L}{\sqrt{(z-L)^{2}-R^{2}}}) $$ for a single magnet. Participants debated whether this formula applies to multiple magnets stacked north pole to south pole, concluding that replacing L with nL (where n is the number of magnets) is a reasonable adjustment. It was confirmed that the magnetic field on the z-axis for the stack is equivalent to that of a single longer magnet.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field equations, specifically for cylindrical magnets.
  • Familiarity with neodymium magnets and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the variables in the magnetic field formula, including μ₀, M, z, R, and L.
  • Basic grasp of magnetic field strength concepts and calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of the magnetic field formula for cylindrical magnets.
  • Explore the effects of stacking magnets on magnetic field strength and distribution.
  • Learn about the differences between individual magnets and stacks in terms of magnetic field behavior.
  • Investigate experimental methods to measure the magnetic field strength of stacked magnets.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in magnet design or applications, particularly those interested in the behavior of neodymium magnets and magnetic field calculations.

xzy922104
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
I know that for a single cylindrical neodymium magnet, the formula
$$ \displaystyle{\displaylines{B(z)=\frac{μ_0M}{2}(\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}-\frac{z-L}{\sqrt{(z-L)^{2}-R^{2}}})}} $$ shows the relationship between the magnetic field strength and the distance between the magnet. I was wondering if this formula still applies when several cylindrical magnets are stacked together, north pole to south pole? If it does not, is there any way that I could adjust it for situations involving stacked magnets? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You assume that L in the formula of B(z) be replaced with nL where n is number of magnets stacked downward. It seems reasonable to me.
[EDIT]upward, not downward
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: xzy922104
xzy922104 said:
I know that for a single cylindrical neodymium magnet, the formula
$$ \displaystyle{\displaylines{B(z)=\frac{μ_0M}{2}(\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}-\frac{z-L}{\sqrt{(z-L)^{2}-R^{2}}})}} $$
That formula looks incorrect to me. In particular the minus signs (except between the two terms.Maybe $$ \displaystyle{\displaylines{B(z)=\frac{μ_0M}{2}(\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}-\frac{z+L}{\sqrt{(z+L)^{2}+R^{2}}})}} $$
Please reference your formula.
 
hutchphd said:
That formula looks incorrect to me. In particular the minus signs (except between the two terms.Maybe $$ \displaystyle{\displaylines{B(z)=\frac{μ_0M}{2}(\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^{2}+R^{2}}}-\frac{z+L}{\sqrt{(z+L)^{2}+R^{2}}})}} $$
Please reference your formula.
I found the formula in this paper, under the section titled "Cylinder".
 

Attachments

xzy922104 said:
I found the formula in this paper, under the section titled "Cylinder"
Oh I see his origin is translated by L relative to what I was considering. They are the same then. .Good
 
anuttarasammyak said:
You assume that L in the formula of B(z) be replaced with nL where n is number of magnets stacked downward. It seems reasonable to me.
[EDIT]upward, not downward
Would stacking the magnets affect the overall magnetic field in some way? Would this magnetic field be different from viewing the stack as a single, longer magnet?
 
xzy922104 said:
Would this magnetic field be different from viewing the stack as a single, longer magnet?
As for the field on z axis , that you refer the formula, it is same as that of a single longer magnet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and berkeman
Thank you all for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 198 ·
7
Replies
198
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K