Magnetic flux of sliding bar on rails

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the magnetic flux change in a circuit formed by a metal bar sliding on parallel rails connected to a capacitor and resistor. The key equation for the magnetic field of a half-infinite wire is given as |\vec{B}|= \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi s}, where s is the perpendicular distance from the wire. The participants conclude that the flux contribution from the sliding bar can be ignored due to its distance from the finite ends of the wires, allowing for a simplified analysis of the magnetic flux change as the bar moves with velocity v.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically magnetic flux and fields.
  • Familiarity with the concept of half-infinite wires and their magnetic field equations.
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration and differentiation of functions.
  • Basic principles of electric circuits, including capacitors and resistors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic fields from infinite and half-infinite wires.
  • Learn about the principles of electromagnetic induction and Faraday's law.
  • Explore the effects of moving conductors in magnetic fields, particularly in relation to induced currents.
  • Investigate the relationship between current, magnetic fields, and the geometry of circuits.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of magnetic fields in circuits involving moving conductors.

DiogenesTorch
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A metal bar which runs on 2 long parallel rails are connected to a charged capacitor with capacitance C and a resistor with resistance R. Assume no friction and perfect conductors. The rails are cylindrical of radius R separated by distance d. The bar is a distance x along the rails where x >> d >> r.

What is the change in the magnetic flux through the center of the circuit if the current I is held constant but the bar is moving with a velocity v. For this part assume the rails are half infinite wires. Careful, it is not obvious that you can ignore the flux contribution from the sliding bar. You have to be clever here."

Homework Equations



My question is why exactly can we ignore the flux contribution from the bar?

It is seems intuitively obvious to me that we can since since x >> d. However my professor generally wants us to be quantitative on things like this and I am not exactly sure how to go about showing this quantitatively. Also I am not sure I am even going about the entire problem correctly.

The Attempt at a Solution



So this is what I have so far. The problem states that we assume the rails are half infinite wires.

The magnitude of the magnetic field of half infinite wire is |\vec{B}|= \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi s} where s is the perpendicular distance from the wire

So the flux is
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \Phi &amp;= \int_{circuit} (\vec{B_{top}} + \vec{B_{bottom}}) \cdot d\vec{a} \\<br /> &amp;= \int_0^x \int_r^{d-r} \Biggr( \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi (y)} + \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi (d-y)} \Biggr) dx dy\\<br /> &amp;=\frac{\mu_0 I x}{2\pi} \ln \Biggr( \frac{d-r}{r} \Biggr)<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Now taking the time derivative

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{d\Phi}{dt} &amp;= \frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi} \ln \Biggr( \frac{d-r}{r} \Biggr) \frac{dx}{dt}\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi} \ln \Biggr( \frac{d-r}{r} \Biggr) v<br /> \end{align*}<br />

So does the above look correct?

The part I am unsure of is how to express that we can ignore the flux from the sliding bar. Especially considering no specific relation is given between x and d.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, DiogenesTorch. Welcome to PF!

DiogenesTorch said:
The magnitude of the magnetic field of half infinite wire is |\vec{B}|= \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi s} where s is the perpendicular distance from the wire.

This is not correct, except at points directly above or below the finite end of the wire. At other points near the finite end, the field produced by the wire would be more complicated. However, for points way down the wire (in the x direction) so that the wire extends far in both directions from the point, the half-wire would produce a field approximately the same as a wire that extends infinitely far in both directions.

The part I am unsure of is how to express that we can ignore the flux from the sliding bar. Especially considering no specific relation is given between x and d.

You are only concerned with the change in flux during a time dt. So, you should think about the change in flux as the rod moves a distance dx during the time dt and the rod is very far from the finite ends of the wires. Try to see why the current in the rod doesn't need to be taken into account when considering the change in flux through the circuit.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K