Magnetic forces on current-carrying wires

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the resultant magnetic force per unit length acting on wire X due to the currents in wires Y and Z. The force per unit length on wire X is given as 0.5 mN/m, with the force from wire Y contributing 2.5x10^-4 N/m directed to the left. The participants clarify that the resultant force on X is the vector sum of the forces from Y and Z, and they emphasize the importance of determining the direction of the current in wire Z based on the forces acting on wire X.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic forces between current-carrying wires
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule for determining force direction
  • Knowledge of vector addition in physics
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formula for magnetic force between parallel wires
  • Learn how to apply the right-hand rule in various scenarios
  • Explore vector addition techniques in physics
  • Investigate the effects of current direction on magnetic force
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in the study of electromagnetism and magnetic forces in current-carrying conductors.

  • #31
MartinCarr said:
See the attached file on the above post..
i've already seen it but i don't understand. can you please explain it to me based on the question i asked above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
How about answering the question I posed earlier?
Doc Al said:
So what additional force must wire Z exert on X to produce the given resultant?
You are given the resultant F/L on wire X. You've calculated the contribution from wire Y. So, what must be the contribution from wire Z? That will tell you the direction of the current in Z and allow you to calculate the magnitude of that current.
 
  • #33
Doc Al said:
How about answering the question I posed earlier?

You are given the resultant F/L on wire X. You've calculated the contribution from wire Y. So, what must be the contribution from wire Z? That will tell you the direction of the current in Z and allow you to calculate the magnitude of that current.
2.5x10^-4 . is it right?
 
  • #34
Did you work this out or do you need me to explain more?
 
  • #35
hooman said:
2.5x10^-4 . is it right?
Don't just give a numeric answer. Describe how you got your answer. And what does that tell you about the direction and magnitude of the current through Z?
 
  • #36
MartinCarr said:
Did you work this out or do you need me to explain more?
explain please
 
  • #37
Doc Al said:
Don't just give a numeric answer. Describe how you got your answer. And what does that tell you about the direction and magnitude of the current through Z?
from the question a, i need to know the direction whether it is right or wrong. so, fron the diagram itself we can know whether it is right or wrong. but i don't know how. i cannot determine the direction by using calculation because how can i know the equation have to use minus or addition.
 
  • #38
MartinCarr said:
Did you work this out or do you need me to explain more?
the statement is wrong. the right one is the resultant force per unit length is actually acted on Y not on X. it's a mistake in typing the question. sorry. so how to determine the direction whether it's right or wrong?
 
  • #39
Doc Al said:
Don't just give a numeric answer. Describe how you got your answer. And what does that tell you about the direction and magnitude of the current through Z?
the statement is wrong. the right one is the resultant force per unit length is actually acted on Y not on X. it's a mistake in typing the question. sorry. so how to determine the direction whether it's right or wrong?
 
  • #40
hooman said:
the statement is wrong. the right one is the resultant force per unit length is actually acted on Y not on X. it's a mistake in typing the question.
At least that explains the "towards X" statement.
hooman said:
so how to determine the direction whether it's right or wrong?
Do you know how to find the force/length between two current-carrying wires? Start there.

Try this: Magnetic Force Between Wires
 
  • #41
Doc Al said:
At least that explains the "towards X" statement.

Do you know how to find the force/length between two current-carrying wires? Start there.

Try this: Magnetic Force Between Wires
what does it means by pointing towards X? yes, I do know how to find F/l
 
  • #42
Doc Al said:
At least that explains the "towards X" statement.

Do you know how to find the force/length between two current-carrying wires? Start there.

Try this: Magnetic Force Between Wires
but, in the question in the link that you gave, i don't know how to do it because the question itself doesn't give any value
 
  • #43
As we know a current carrying wire will induce a magnetic field around it. This field will be clockwise around the wire in the direction of current. Both wire Y and Z will exert a force on X.

By looking at the direction of the magnetic field from Y and then Z at the side of X (either into or out of the paper) you can use the hand rules (movement, flux & current) you can work out which way the wire will move.

Using the formula in the attachment you can then calculate the force and hence the direction and value of current in the question.
 
  • #44
Considering the figure as it is ,
Force on X due to Y is towards left
Force on X due to Z is towards right.
As net force on X is towards left ( see the attachment ).
F(y) > F (z).
F (net) = F(y) - F( z)
50 x 10^(-5) = 25 x 10^ (-5) - (20xI /6) x 10^(-5)
Solving we get negative value for I which is meaningless . In my opinion it should not be.
So direction of current in Z should be downward.
Then due to both Y and Z forces will be towards X.
 

Attachments

  • 20200422_232117.jpg
    20200422_232117.jpg
    28.6 KB · Views: 149

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
612