Magnetizing a ferromagnetic material

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for magnetizing ferromagnetic materials, exploring various materials' properties and behaviors in relation to magnetization. Participants discuss practical techniques, material characteristics, and the challenges associated with different substances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that placing a ferromagnetic material in a magnetic field is a straightforward method for magnetization.
  • Another participant explains that the ability of a material to retain magnetization is known as remanence, while coercivity refers to its resistance to demagnetization.
  • A participant notes that graphite is difficult to magnetize compared to carbon or stainless steel, questioning whether coercivity is a factor in this difference.
  • It is pointed out that graphite does not make a magnet, and the discussion shifts to ferrites, which have distinct properties compared to traditional ferromagnetic materials.
  • Participants discuss the characteristics of ferrites, including their low remanence and good coercivity, while also noting that pure iron can be magnetized through specific processes.
  • There is mention of the magnetic properties of stainless steel, which depend on its crystal structure, with a distinction made between Martensitic and Austenitic types.
  • Finally, a suggestion is made that mild steel components are the most suitable for creating strong magnets due to their availability and magnetic properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the magnetization of various materials, particularly regarding graphite versus ferrites and the properties of stainless steel. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the best materials and methods for magnetization.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the specific properties of materials mentioned, such as the exact type of graphite or ferrite being referred to, and the complexities involved in measuring or predicting their behaviors.

abdulbadii
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
How do we magnetize a ferromagnetic material the easiest way
How do we magnetize a ferromagnetic material the best, easiest way, e.g., can we just let it sit around strong magnets in a particular position?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just put it into a magnetic field.

Do you mean that it then holds the magnetic field? This is a function of the material and is called its remanence.

The ability of a duly magnetised mass to retain the ("remanent") field is called coercivity.

To fully saturate a permanent magnet, heat it to above its Curie temperature (the point at which it is no longer ferromagnetic) and expose it to a saturating field as it cools down.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
just found a cylindrical/tube/circular graphite, material for acquired magnet, difficult get magnetized compared to carbon/stainless steel when both sit around strong magnets in the same position

So would it be the coercivity of the latter higher than the former, and must be worked with the last explanation?
 
Graphite will not make a magnet. You are probably looking at a ferrite material.

Ferrites (metal oxides and other materials sintered together) have some significantly different properties to ferromagnetic materials and cover a very wide range of behaviours. It would be impossible to answer your question directly unless you know exactly what the material is, and even then ferrites have very difficult-to-measure-or-predict non-linear properties.

In general ferrites are 'soft' which means they have low remanence (the material's internal field vanishes more easily when the external field is removed), which is a feature you might want in, for example, a high frequency transformer.

But those ferrites that can be magnetised tend to have quite a good coercivity (resistance to demagnetisation) but none have a particularly high saturation flux (i.e. not particularly strong compared to iron cores).

Carbon steels are usually 'hard' and will hold a field after exposure to an external field. The more carbon the harder the steel, in general. Pure iron has very little remanence but can be formed into a magnet by the process above of heating and cooling in a field, and will also develop a field by simply being hammered in a magnetic field, even the Earth's magnetic field.

Stainless steels are only magnetic when they have a Martensitic crystal structure. Austenitic stainless (most of what you might buy from a regular shop) is non magnetic. The phase may change under mechanical modifications, for example if a sheet of Austenitic is pressed and formed into a sink shape, the work-hardening that occurs on the curves may form Martensitic phases, so if you roam around a sink with a magnet you'll find it is slightly magnetic on the curvy bits but not magnetic on the flat bits.

To make a 'regular' magnet from 'regular' metals, use mild steel components, such as mild steel rods or threaded studs and bolts, these are the easiest materials to find on the basis of making the strongest magnet versus ease of finding something suitable. ('Mild' means not too much carbon, but enough for its engineering strength and enough to hold a remanent magnetic field.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
280
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K