Magnitude and angle of vector sum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude and angle of the resultant force from multiple vectors. Participants explore methods for determining vector components, summing forces, and finding angles, with a focus on both conceptual understanding and mathematical application.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express difficulty in finding the components of the forces involved, particularly the x and y components.
  • There are suggestions to break down vectors into components using trigonometric functions, with references to "SOH CAH TOA" for right triangles.
  • One participant proposes using the law of cosines and the parallelogram law as an alternative method for finding the resultant force's magnitude.
  • Discussions arise regarding the correct approach to calculating angles, with some using arcsine and others suggesting tangent based on the components.
  • Participants debate the necessity of simplifying trigonometric values before calculations, with differing opinions on the impact of using LaTeX for clarity.
  • There are multiple calculations presented for the resultant force's magnitude and angle, with some participants arriving at different values and methods.
  • One participant mentions the importance of considering the direction of the resultant vector and how to express it in terms of cardinal directions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to calculate vector components and resultant forces, but there is no consensus on the best method for finding angles or the necessity of simplifying trigonometric expressions. Multiple competing views on the calculations and interpretations of results remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations rely on specific assumptions about the angles and directions of the forces, and there are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the use of trigonometric functions for angle determination. The discussion also highlights varying levels of comfort with mathematical notation and presentation.

  • #31
I thought this was a standard physics question in which the answer would have been 40.9 or 49.1, but I just re-read the question: "angle it makes with the positive x-axis." So yes, your answer was what they were looking for :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ineedhelpnow said:
Rido the back of the book says 139.1 (Dull) lol

I only read:

Rido12 said:
So yes, 139.1 is right

(Rofl)
 
  • #33
@ILS lol you're hilarious

@Rido but wouldn't the answer be 139 no matter what because it was -41. not 41. i suppose the answer could be left as -1 but that's the same as 139 (Wondering)
 
  • #34
(Giggle)
@ILS
It's been a while since I actually read the question, so I was convinced 40.1 was the right answer...so while I was writing my answer, I realized that I got 139.1 too (Rofl) But I was too lazy to erase what I had already said (Nod)

@ineedhelpnow, in physics, they don't care about the angle 139.1. they care more about the related acute angle from the horizontal or vertical axis. The related acute is a positive angle.
 
  • #35
Rido12 said:
(Giggle)@ineedhelpnow, in physics, they don't care about the angle 139.1. they care more about the related acute angle from the horizontal or vertical axis. The related acute is a positive angle.

it shouldn't be much of a surprise when i say that I am terrible at physics... (Blush)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
844
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
906
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K