Magnitude of a vector in polar coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The magnitude of the velocity vector in polar coordinates is calculated using the expression ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##, resulting in a magnitude of ##\sqrt{52}## or approximately 7.21 m/s. The acceleration can be derived using two methods: the centripetal acceleration formula ##a = \frac{v^2}{r}## yields 17.33 m/s², while the derived acceleration vector ##\vec{a} = -12 \hat{r} + 16 \hat{\theta}## gives a magnitude of 20 m/s². The discrepancy arises because the motion is not uniform circular motion, necessitating consideration of the time rate of change of the basis vectors in polar coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their basis vectors, ##\hat{r}## and ##\hat{\theta}##.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly in deriving velocity and acceleration vectors.
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem as applied to vector magnitudes.
  • Concept of centripetal acceleration and its application in non-uniform motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of velocity and acceleration in polar coordinates using the formulas provided.
  • Learn about the time derivatives of basis vectors in polar coordinates.
  • Explore examples of non-uniform circular motion and its implications on acceleration calculations.
  • Investigate the relationship between Cartesian and polar coordinate systems in vector analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and dynamics, as well as engineers working with polar coordinate systems in their analyses.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


What is the magnitude of the velocity vector if ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how do do this in Cartesian coordinates (use the Pythagorean theorem), but not so sure how to do it in polar coordinates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Though the point at which this vector is defined may be given in polar coordinates, the basis expansion \hat{r},\hat{\theta} by which the vector is expressed is still an ortho-normal basis so your vector's magnitude still is the root summed square of components.
 
jambaugh said:
Though the point at which this vector is defined may be given in polar coordinates, the basis expansion \hat{r},\hat{\theta} by which the vector is expressed is still an ortho-normal basis so your vector's magnitude still is the root summed square of components.
Cool! Now I have a similar question.

I am given that ##\dot{r} = 4 ~m/s## and ##\dot{\theta} = 2## rad/s, and when a particle is 3 m from the origin, I am asked to find the magnitude of the velocity and the acceleration. This is easy enough.

From the givens, we know that ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##. Then we have a magnitude of ##\sqrt{52}##. Then to find the acceleration, we can do either of two things: ##a = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{52}{3} = 17.33## m/s. But also, we could use the given information to derive the acceleration vector, which would be ##\vec{a} = -12 \hat{r} + 16 \hat{\theta}##. We find the magnitude of this is 20 m/s^2, not the same as the 17.33 we got earlier. What is going on?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Cool! Now I have a similar question.

I am given that ##\dot{r} = 4 ~m/s## and ##\dot{\theta} = 2## rad/s, and when a particle is 3 m from the origin, I am asked to find the magnitude of the velocity and the acceleration. This is easy enough.

From the givens, we know that ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##. Then we have a magnitude of ##\sqrt{52}##. Then to find the acceleration, we can do either of two things: ##a = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{52}{3} = 17.33## m/s. But also, we could use the given information to derive the acceleration vector, which would be ##\vec{a} = -12 \hat{r} + 16 \hat{\theta}##. We find the magnitude of this is 20 m/s^2, not the same as the 17.33 we got earlier. What is going on?
The acceleration is v2/r in case of uniform circular motion when the velocity is perpendicular to the radius and the acceleration is centripetal only.
 
ehild said:
The acceleration is v2/r in case of uniform circular motion when the velocity is perpendicular to the radius and the acceleration is centripetal only.
So is the correct answer for the magnitude of the acceleration 17.33 m/s^2?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
So is the correct answer for the magnitude of the acceleration 17.33 m/s^2?
No. Is it uniform circular motion?
 
ehild said:
No. Is it uniform circular motion?
Oops, I meant is the correct magnitude for the acceleration 20 m/s^2? (I looked at the wrong number)
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Oops, I meant is the correct magnitude for the acceleration 20 m/s^2? (I looked at the wrong number)
That is correct.
 
An important feature of this problem is that the local rectilinear coordinate system defined by \hat{r},\hat{\theta} is moving. Thus in calculating the acceleration vector you must take into account the time rate of change of the basis vectors.

In general: \hat{r} = \hat{i}\cos(\theta) + \hat{j}\sin(\theta) so then \dot{\hat{r}} = \dot{\theta}(-\hat{i}\sin(\theta)+ \hat{j}\cos(\theta)) \equiv \dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}. Similarly \dot{\hat{\theta}} = - \dot{\theta}\hat{r}. With these worked out you can take the time derivatives of the position vector to get velocity and acceleration in the local (normalized) coordinate basis:
Velocity: \vec{r} = r\hat{r},\quad \vec{v}=\dot{\vec{r}} = \dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\hat{r}}=\dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}
Acceleration:
\vec{a}=\dot{\vec{v}}=\ddot{r}\hat{r} + \dot{r}\dot{\hat{r}}+ \dot{r}\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta} + r\ddot{\theta}\hat{\theta} + r\dot{\theta}\dot{\hat{\theta}}= [\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2]\hat{r} +[ 2 \dot{r}\dot{\theta} + r\ddot{\theta}]\hat{\theta}

Knowing your velocity is 4\hat{r} + 6\hat{\theta} you know that \dot{r}=4, r\dot{\theta} = 6 and given r = 3meters you have \dot{\theta} = 2.

The acceleration vector is then:
[\ddot{r}-(3)(2)^2]\hat{r} +[ 2 (4)(2) + (3)\ddot{\theta}]\hat{\theta} = [\ddot{r}-12]\hat{r}+[16+\ddot{\theta}]\hat{\theta}
You have not given enough information to solve the problem. You need the 2nd derivatives of the polar coordinates w.r.t. time. Presumably these are zero? You haven't stated the full problem as given to you. Was there something stating constant rate of change of theses?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K