What is Polar coordinates: Definition and 586 Discussions
In mathematics, the polar coordinate system is a two-dimensional coordinate system in which each point on a plane is determined by a distance from a reference point and an angle from a reference direction. The reference point (analogous to the origin of a Cartesian coordinate system) is called the pole, and the ray from the pole in the reference direction is the polar axis. The distance from the pole is called the radial coordinate, radial distance or simply radius, and the angle is called the angular coordinate, polar angle, or azimuth. The radial coordinate is often denoted by r or ρ, and the angular coordinate by φ, θ, or t. Angles in polar notation are generally expressed in either degrees or radians (2π rad being equal to 360°).
Grégoire de Saint-Vincent and Bonaventura Cavalieri independently introduced the concepts in the mid-17th century, though the actual term polar coordinates has been attributed to Gregorio Fontana in the 18th century. The initial motivation for the introduction of the polar system was the study of circular and orbital motion.
Polar coordinates are most appropriate in any context where the phenomenon being considered is inherently tied to direction and length from a center point in a plane, such as spirals. Planar physical systems with bodies moving around a central point, or phenomena originating from a central point, are often simpler and more intuitive to model using polar coordinates.
The polar coordinate system is extended to three dimensions in two ways: the cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems.
My confusion refers to this question above.
If I were to ask you, what is the equation of the radial line, what would you say? I know that the general equation the radial line with cartesian gradient of m has an equation of θ = arctan(m). Clearly here the angle between the radial line and...
we can express theta as a product of the angular velocity and time thus plugging this in space of theta in the above equations we can express r hat and theta hat as a function of time. But i am having problems in integrating them and again converting them back to the terms of r hat and theta hat...
In polar coordinates, ##x=rcos(\theta)## and ##y=rsin(\theta)## and their respective time derivatives are
$$\dot{x}=\dot{r}cos(\theta) - r\dot{\theta}sin(\theta)$$
$$\dot{y}= \dot{r}sin(\theta)+r\dot{\theta}cos(\theta)$$
so the lagrangian becomes after a little simplifying...
"Firstly, I represented [Uθ ]on the two-dimensional polar coordinate system to facilitate the steps and projections."
Then, I have written the steps, step by step, to ultimately derive the expression U(θ) in terms of i and j which is:
[ Uθ=−sin(θ)i+cos(θ)j ]
NOTE: The professor provided us...
Hi,
Unfortunately, I am not quite sure whether I have solved/plotted the following task correctly
I started by resolving the expression ##\phi=2 \pi t## to t so that I can represent ##\rho(t)## with ##\rho(\phi)##
The vector ##\vec{e}_r## was written in my lecture as follows...
In the following%3A%20https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2013/sm/c3sm00140g?casa_token=3O_jwMdswQQAAAAA%3AaSRtvg3XUHSnUwFKEDo01etmudxmMm8lcU4dIUSkJ52Hzitv2c_RSQJYsoHE1Bm2ubZ3sdt6mq5S-w'] paper, the surface velocity for a moving, spherical particle is given as (eq 1)...
The 2D Fourier transform is given by: \hat{f}(k,l)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}f(x,y)e^{-ikx-ily}dxdy
In terms of polar co-ordinates: \hat{f}(\rho,\phi)=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}rf(r,\theta)e^{-ir\rho\cos(\theta-\phi)}drd\theta
For Fourier transforms in cartesian co-ordinates, relating the...
I made this exercise up to acquire more skill with polar coordinates. The idea is you're given the acceleration vector and have to find the position vector corresponding to it, working in reverse of the image.
My attempts are the following, I proceed using 3 "independent" methods just as you...
Hello, I am trying to solve the following problem:
If ##z=f(x,y)##, where ##x=rcos\theta## and ##y=rsin\theta##, find ##\frac {\partial z} {\partial r}## and ##\frac {\partial z} {\partial \theta}## and show that ##\left( \frac {\partial z} {\partial x}\right){^2}+\left( \frac {\partial z}...
The wavefunction of ##|\psi\rangle## is given by the bra ket
##\psi (x,y,z)=
\langle r| \psi\rangle##
I can convert the wavefunction from Cartesian to polar and have the wavefunction as ## \psi (r,\theta,\phi)##
What bra should act on the ket ##|\psi\rangle## to give me the wavefunction as ##...
Hello everybody,
Currently I am doing my master's thesis and I've encountered a physics problem which is very difficult for me to solve. The problem I have is finding equations for the magnetic scalar potential inside and outside a ferromagnetic wire for specific boundary conditions...
In my job, I was given the task of calculating a force that operates an ultrasound transmitter on a receiver. The calculation is made by assuming that each point on the transmitter is a small transmitter and integration should be made on the surface of the transmitter.
Since the transmitter is...
I have a function in polar coordinates:
t (rho, phi) = H^2 / (H^2 + rho^2) (1)
I have moved the center to the right and want to get the new formulae.
I use cartesian coordinates to simplify the transformation (L =...
Hi,
I am trying to find open-form solutions to the integrals attached below. Lambda and Eta are positive, known constants, smaller than 10 (if it helps). I would appreciate any help! Thank you!
I had an equation. $$T=\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{x}^2+(r\dot{\theta})^2]$$ Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$ I was thinking how they had derived it. The equation is looking like, they had differentiate "something". Is it just an...
Greetings!
I have the following integral
and here is the solution of the book (which I understand perfectly)
I have an altenative method I want to apply that does not seems to gives me the final resultMy method
which doesn't give me the final results!
where is my mistake?
thank you!
Hi
I was always under the impression that i could write
a2 = a.a = a2 Equation 1
where a⋅ is a vector and a is its modulus but when it comes to the kinetic energy term for a particle in plane polar coordinates I'm confused ( i apologise here as i don't know how to write time derivative with...
>10. Let a family of curves be integral curves of a differential equation ##y^{\prime}=f(x, y) .## Let a second family have the property that at each point ##P=(x, y)## the angle from the curve of the first family through ##P## to the curve of the second family through ##P## is ##\alpha .## Show...
I have a question that might be considered vague or even downright idiotic but just wanted to know that once we find out the velocity & acceleration of a body in angular motion in plane polar coordinates, and are asked to integrate the expressions in order to find position at some specified time...
I am trying to derive the tangential acceleration of a particle. We have tangential velocity, radius and angular velocity. $$v_{tangential}= \omega r$$ then by multiplication rule, $$\dot v_{tangential} = a_{tangential} = \dot \omega r + \omega \dot r$$ and $$a_{tangential} = \ddot \theta r +...
Doing a review for my SAT Physics test and I'm practicing vectors. However, I am lost on this problem I know I need to use trigonometry to get the lengths then use c^2=a^2+b^2. But I need help going about this.
I got a polar function.
$$ \psi = P(\theta )R(r) $$
When I calculate the Laplacian:
$$ \ \vec \nabla^2 \psi = P(\theta)R^{\prime\prime}(r) + \frac{P(\theta)R^{\prime}(r)}{r} + \frac{R(r)P^{\prime\prime}(\theta)}{r^{2}}
$$
Now I need to convert this one into cartesian coordinates and then...
there is a problem in a book that asks to find the orthogonal trajectories to the curves described by the equation :
$$r^{2} = a^{2}\cos(\theta)$$
the attempt of a solution is as following :
1- i defferntiate with respect to ##\theta## :
$$2r \frac{dr}{d\theta} = -a^{2}\;\sin(\theta)$$
2- i...
Hi,
I was just working on a homework problem where the first part is about proving some formula related to Stokes' Theorem. If we have a vector \vec a = U \vec b , where \vec b is a constant vector, then we can get from Stokes' theorem to the following:
\iint_S U \vec{dS} = \iiint_V \nabla...
I encountered a question which asked me to describe the rose petal sketched below in polar coordinates. The complete answer is
R = {(r, θ): 0 ≤ r ≤ 6 cos(3θ), 0 ≤ θ ≤ π}. That makes sense to me for the right petal. What about the other two on the left?
The equations of motion are:
\ddot{r}-r{\dot{\theta}} ^{2} = -\frac{1}{r^{2}}
for the radial acceleration and
r\ddot{\theta} + 2\dot{r}\dot{\theta}= 0
for the transverse acceleration
When I integrate these equations I get only circles. The energy of the system is constant and the angular...
If I use cartesian co-ordinates, I get:
##\bar{x}=\frac{1}{A}\iint x\, dA=\frac{1}{A} \iint r^2\cos\theta\, dr\, d\theta= \frac{2a\sin\theta}{3\theta}##
##\bar{y}=\frac{1}{A}\iint y\, dA=\frac{1}{A}\iint r^2\sin\theta\, dr\, d\theta= \frac{2a(1-\cos\theta)}{3\theta}##
But if I use polar...
In the example above, the authors claim that when ##r=r_0e^{\beta t}##, the radial acceleration of the particle is 0. I don't quite understand it because they did not assume ##\beta=\pm \omega##.
Can anyone please explain it to me? Many thanks.
I am learning to use polar coordinates to describe the motions of particles. Now I know how to use polar coordinates to solve problems and the derivations of many equations. However, the big picture of polar coordinates remains unclear to me. Would you mind sharing your insight with me so that I...
The velocity of a particle below is expressed in polar coordinates, with bases e r and e theta. I know that the length of a vector expressed in i,j,k is the square of its components. But here er and e theta are not i,j,k. Plus they are changing as well. Can someone help convince me that the...
If I have a physical problem, say, a particle which is constrained to move in the ##y## direction, which means that its ##x## coordinate remains fixed, does it make sense to write ##y## in terms of polar coordinates? That is, ##y = r \sin\theta##. Since now I have two parameters ##r,\theta##...
This is what I have so far, please need urgent help. I don't understand and know what to do.
For the first part, I got a really long answer, for the second part I am trying in terms of mv^2/r = mg, or mg = m*(answer to first), but I am getting nowhere. PLease help
To begin with, I posted this thread ahead of time simply because I thought it may provide me some insight on how to solve for another problem that I have previously posted here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/special-relativity-test-particle-inside-suns-gravitational-field.983171/unread...
Ive found ##\delta x/\delta r## as ##sin\theta cos\phi##
##\delta r/\delta x## as ##csc\theta sec\phi##
But unsure how to do the second part? Chain rule seems to give r/x not x/r?
In spherical poler coordinates the volume integral over a sphere of radius R of $$\int^R_0\vec \nabla•\frac{\hat r}{r^2}dv=\int_{surface}\frac{\hat r}{r^2}•\vec ds$$
$$=4\pi=4\pi\int_{-\inf}^{inf}\delta(r)dr$$
How can it be extended to get $$\vec \nabla•\frac{\hat r}{r^2}=4\pi\delta^3(r)??$$
Hello there,
I'm struggling in this problem because i think i can't find the right ##\theta## or ##r##
Here's my work:
##\pi/4\leq\theta\leq\pi/2##
and
##0\leq r\leq 2\sin\theta##
So the integral would be: ##\int_{\pi/4}^{\pi/2}\int_{0}^{2\sin\theta}\sin\theta dr d\theta##
Which is equal to...
The area differential ##dA## in Cartesian coordinates is ##dxdy##.
The area differential ##dA## in polar coordinates is ##r dr d\theta##.
How do we get from one to the other and prove that ##dxdy## is indeed equal to ##r dr d\theta##?
##dxdy=r dr d\theta##
The trigonometric functions are used...
A solution of equations of motion for charged particle in a uniform magnetic field are well known (##r = const##, ## \dot{\phi} = const##). But if I tring to solve this equation using only mathematical background (without physical reasoning) I can't do this due to entaglements of variables...
I have a little question about converting Velocity formula that is derived as,
##\vec{V}=\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}=\frac{dx}{dt}\hat{x}+\frac{dy}{dt}\hat{y}+\frac{dz}{dt}\hat{z}##
in Cartesian Coordinate Systems ##(x, y, z)##. I want to convert this into Polar Coordinate System ##(r, \theta)##...
I considered the work done by the frictional force in an infinitesimal angular displacement:
$$dW = Frd\theta = (kr\omega) rd\theta = kr^{2} \frac{d\theta}{dt} d\theta$$I now tried to integrate this quantity from pi/2 to 0, however couldn't figure out how to do this$$W =...
I have a right triangle: one of the angles is ##60°## (that's ##\theta##), one of the sides is ##40 m## long, and the hypotenuse is equal to the radius. Now I can find an expression for ##r## and that expression is ##r=\frac{height}{sin \theta}##. If I differentiate it, I'll get ##\dot r## and...
Well, what I've done so far is calculating the magnitude of velocity and acceleration replacing ##t=2## in ##\theta (t)## and ##r(t)## so I could get the expressions for ##\dot r##, ##\dot \theta##, ##\ddot r## and ##\ddot \theta##. But that's not my problem... my problem is related to the...