Magnitude of a vector in polar coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the magnitude of a velocity vector expressed in polar coordinates, specifically when given components in the form of ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##. Participants explore the differences between Cartesian and polar coordinate systems in calculating magnitudes and accelerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method for calculating the magnitude of a vector in polar coordinates, questioning the application of the Pythagorean theorem. Some suggest that the magnitude can still be derived as the root sum of squares of the components. Others raise questions about the relationship between velocity and acceleration in this context, particularly when different methods yield varying results.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the calculations of velocity and acceleration. Some have offered guidance on the implications of the coordinate system's movement, while others are exploring the need for additional information to fully resolve the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information regarding the second derivatives of the polar coordinates, which are necessary for a complete analysis of the acceleration vector. Participants are also considering the implications of uniform circular motion and the assumptions that may or may not apply to the problem.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


What is the magnitude of the velocity vector if ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how do do this in Cartesian coordinates (use the Pythagorean theorem), but not so sure how to do it in polar coordinates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Though the point at which this vector is defined may be given in polar coordinates, the basis expansion \hat{r},\hat{\theta} by which the vector is expressed is still an ortho-normal basis so your vector's magnitude still is the root summed square of components.
 
jambaugh said:
Though the point at which this vector is defined may be given in polar coordinates, the basis expansion \hat{r},\hat{\theta} by which the vector is expressed is still an ortho-normal basis so your vector's magnitude still is the root summed square of components.
Cool! Now I have a similar question.

I am given that ##\dot{r} = 4 ~m/s## and ##\dot{\theta} = 2## rad/s, and when a particle is 3 m from the origin, I am asked to find the magnitude of the velocity and the acceleration. This is easy enough.

From the givens, we know that ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##. Then we have a magnitude of ##\sqrt{52}##. Then to find the acceleration, we can do either of two things: ##a = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{52}{3} = 17.33## m/s. But also, we could use the given information to derive the acceleration vector, which would be ##\vec{a} = -12 \hat{r} + 16 \hat{\theta}##. We find the magnitude of this is 20 m/s^2, not the same as the 17.33 we got earlier. What is going on?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Cool! Now I have a similar question.

I am given that ##\dot{r} = 4 ~m/s## and ##\dot{\theta} = 2## rad/s, and when a particle is 3 m from the origin, I am asked to find the magnitude of the velocity and the acceleration. This is easy enough.

From the givens, we know that ##\vec{v} = 4 \hat{r} + 6 \hat{\theta}##. Then we have a magnitude of ##\sqrt{52}##. Then to find the acceleration, we can do either of two things: ##a = \frac{v^2}{r} = \frac{52}{3} = 17.33## m/s. But also, we could use the given information to derive the acceleration vector, which would be ##\vec{a} = -12 \hat{r} + 16 \hat{\theta}##. We find the magnitude of this is 20 m/s^2, not the same as the 17.33 we got earlier. What is going on?
The acceleration is v2/r in case of uniform circular motion when the velocity is perpendicular to the radius and the acceleration is centripetal only.
 
ehild said:
The acceleration is v2/r in case of uniform circular motion when the velocity is perpendicular to the radius and the acceleration is centripetal only.
So is the correct answer for the magnitude of the acceleration 17.33 m/s^2?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
So is the correct answer for the magnitude of the acceleration 17.33 m/s^2?
No. Is it uniform circular motion?
 
ehild said:
No. Is it uniform circular motion?
Oops, I meant is the correct magnitude for the acceleration 20 m/s^2? (I looked at the wrong number)
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Oops, I meant is the correct magnitude for the acceleration 20 m/s^2? (I looked at the wrong number)
That is correct.
 
An important feature of this problem is that the local rectilinear coordinate system defined by \hat{r},\hat{\theta} is moving. Thus in calculating the acceleration vector you must take into account the time rate of change of the basis vectors.

In general: \hat{r} = \hat{i}\cos(\theta) + \hat{j}\sin(\theta) so then \dot{\hat{r}} = \dot{\theta}(-\hat{i}\sin(\theta)+ \hat{j}\cos(\theta)) \equiv \dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}. Similarly \dot{\hat{\theta}} = - \dot{\theta}\hat{r}. With these worked out you can take the time derivatives of the position vector to get velocity and acceleration in the local (normalized) coordinate basis:
Velocity: \vec{r} = r\hat{r},\quad \vec{v}=\dot{\vec{r}} = \dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\hat{r}}=\dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}
Acceleration:
\vec{a}=\dot{\vec{v}}=\ddot{r}\hat{r} + \dot{r}\dot{\hat{r}}+ \dot{r}\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta} + r\ddot{\theta}\hat{\theta} + r\dot{\theta}\dot{\hat{\theta}}= [\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2]\hat{r} +[ 2 \dot{r}\dot{\theta} + r\ddot{\theta}]\hat{\theta}

Knowing your velocity is 4\hat{r} + 6\hat{\theta} you know that \dot{r}=4, r\dot{\theta} = 6 and given r = 3meters you have \dot{\theta} = 2.

The acceleration vector is then:
[\ddot{r}-(3)(2)^2]\hat{r} +[ 2 (4)(2) + (3)\ddot{\theta}]\hat{\theta} = [\ddot{r}-12]\hat{r}+[16+\ddot{\theta}]\hat{\theta}
You have not given enough information to solve the problem. You need the 2nd derivatives of the polar coordinates w.r.t. time. Presumably these are zero? You haven't stated the full problem as given to you. Was there something stating constant rate of change of theses?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K