Main Idea Behind Determinant & Its Purpose

  • Thread starter Thread starter vktsn0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Idea
Click For Summary
The determinant is primarily used to solve systems of equations and represents the signed volume of the N-dimensional parallelepiped formed by N vectors. While historically significant, determinants are less commonly used today due to the availability of more efficient methods for general linear systems. However, they remain valuable for specially-structured systems and have important theoretical applications. The determinant also serves as a means to obtain a totally anti-symmetrized product. Overall, its utility spans both practical problem-solving and theoretical exploration.
vktsn0303
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting with no apparent research done first
What is the main idea behind the determinant? What was the main purpose for which it was conceived?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Extremely useful for solving systems of equations. History here but I suppose you googled that too ?
 
The determinant of of N vectors gives you the (signed) volume of the N-dimensional parallelepiped they span. Most of its uses come from either this property, or it's property as the simplest way of getting a totally anti-symmetrized product of stuff.
 
BvU said:
Extremely useful for solving systems of equations. History here but I suppose you googled that too ?

Actually, determinants rarely used anymore for solving general linear systems of equations, because there are so many more efficient and simpler methods available. However, for specially-structured systems, determinants can, indeed, be the best way of solving them. They are also very useful theoretically.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
775
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K