Main Sequence Star Mass: Star 1, 2 & 3 Comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sastronaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Stars
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of three main sequence stars, focusing on their mass based on given characteristics such as lifespan, spectral type, and luminosity. Participants explore how these factors relate to the stars' masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between a star's lifespan and its mass, questioning whether the stars could have approximately the same mass despite differing characteristics. There is also consideration of the implications of luminosity and spectral type on mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between luminosity and mass, and the distinction between main sequence stars and other types. However, there is no explicit consensus on the mass comparison due to insufficient information about the stars.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the specific types of stars, particularly Star 2, which complicates the comparison. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and characteristics of main sequence stars.

Sastronaut
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


consider the information given below about three main sequence stars. Star 1 will be a main sequence star for 4.5 billion years. Star 2 has a spectral type of M5. Star 3 has the same luminosity as the Sun. Which has the greatest mass or are they approx. the same?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Spectral class M5 tells me that the star is cool, dim, and small. I know that the sun has been on main sequence longer than 4.5 billion years and will remain on it longer than that. I know that the life time of a star is related to their mass. So after pondering the question i believe the answer is Star 1 b/c it will have a shorter life span than star 2 and 3 which to me indicated it is a relatively more massive star. Though is my thought process correct? Could stars 1, 2, and 3 all have approx the same mass? any help would be great thanks pf!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your analysis is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
the only issue i have is that the luminosity is proportion to AT^4 so star two could be large and hence have more mass...any thoughts? i can say that i there is insufficient info to answer
 
Main sequence stars of the same mass all have about the same radius and temperature. So the main sequence star with the same luminosity as the sun has about the same mass as the sun. It's true that a red giant could be spectral type M5 and be larger and have more mass than the sun. But a red giant is not a main sequence star.
 
Sastronaut said:
the only issue i have is that the luminosity is proportion to AT^4 so star two could be large and hence have more mass...any thoughts? i can say that i there is insufficient info to answer
That is the best answer (insufficient info). All you know about star 2 is its color, and hence its surface temperature). You don't know whether it is a red dwarf, a red giant, or even a red supergiant.

There is a definitive answer if you know that all three stars are main sequence stars (which is what the title of the thread suggests).
 
Your absolutely correct and I recognized that shortly after posting! thank you DH!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K