M_p^3 = \frac{V_s^3}{2\pi G} PM_s^2Solve Binary Star Mass Homework Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the mass of a secondary star in a binary star system using the equation ##M_P^3 = \frac{V_s^3}{2\pi G} PM_s^2##. The participants utilize Kepler's laws and gravitational equations to establish the relationship between the masses and velocities of the stars. The conclusion emphasizes that the mass of the secondary star, ##M_P##, is often negligible compared to the primary star's mass, ##M_s##, simplifying the calculations in astrophysical contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational equations in astrophysics
  • Basic knowledge of binary star systems
  • Concept of mass and velocity relationships in celestial mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion in detail
  • Learn about gravitational interactions in binary star systems
  • Explore the implications of mass ratios in astrophysical calculations
  • Investigate the role of velocity in determining celestial body masses
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts in astrophysics, particularly those studying binary star systems and gravitational dynamics, will benefit from this discussion.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



96yhwo.png
How do I show that for a binary star system, if one star has mass ##M_s##, speed ##V_s##, period ##P##, the mass of the other star is given by: ##M_P^3 \approx \frac{V_s^3}{2\pi G} PM_s^2##?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{GM_pM_s}{(a_p+a_s)^2} = \frac{M_s v_s^2}{a_s}
Substituting in ##PV_s=2\pi a_s##:
M_p = \frac{2\pi(a_p+a_s)^2V_s}{PG}
Using kepler's second law: ## P^2 = \frac{(a_p+a_s)^3(2\pi)^2}{G(M_p+M_s)} ##:
M_p^3 = \frac{V_s^3}{2\pi G} P (M_p+M_s)^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems correct to me. The mass of the planet is more often than not negligible compared to the mass of a star, so M_{p} << M_{S}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Fightfish said:
Seems correct to me. The mass of the planet is more often than not negligible compared to the mass of a star, so M_{p} << M_{S}

Thanks a lot! I'm doing an introductory course to my first ever astrophysics module, so I'm not quite familiar with these things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K