Mainstream Science: What's the Mainstay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mainstay of mainstream science is fundamentally rooted in the principles of thermodynamics, which assert that the laws governing our corner of the universe are applicable universally. This assumption is critical for advancing our understanding of physics. Additionally, the scientific method is essential for rational inquiry and understanding phenomena, as it provides a structured approach to study and validate scientific theories. The discussion also highlights the significance of the electromagnetic spectrum in the creation and maintenance of the universe, while acknowledging the roles of gravity and spacetime in ongoing scientific exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the scientific method
  • Basic knowledge of the electromagnetic spectrum
  • Awareness of gravity and spacetime theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced thermodynamics concepts and their applications
  • Study the scientific method in-depth and its historical significance
  • Investigate the role of the electromagnetic spectrum in physics
  • Research current theories on gravity and spacetime, including recent discoveries
USEFUL FOR

Scientists, educators, students, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of physics and the scientific method.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
I understand that every thing in science is questionable, but what if anything
is the mainstay for main stream science?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermodynamics?
 
- the assumption that - by and large - our corner of the universe is pretty much like any other part of the universe - that laws that apply here can be expected to apply elsewhere.

This is an extremely important assumption in our exploration of the laws of physics, without which, we would be unable to believe we have a fundamental understanding of anything.
 
My approach would be based upon semantics, in that I agree with the foregoing answers but have a different one of my own due to a different way of interpreting the question. To me, the mainstay of science is the approach to any phenomenon as something to be studied and understood as much as possible from a rational standpoint, and must be integrated into any foregoing scenarios to build upon the foundations of the science that has gone before.
 
Last edited:
the universe is here and was created and is maintained by the electromagnetic spectrum. without it nothing would exist
 
No one has mentioned gravity yet, or space time, the theories that tie up
some top thinkers, is it for ever over the horizon of discovery, or just
tantalizing close?
 
How come noone's mentioned the scientific method yet? Without it, the "mainstay" of physics would probably be God or some other supernatural entity.
 
kernelpenguin said:
How come noone's mentioned the scientific method yet? Without it, the "mainstay" of physics would probably be God or some other supernatural entity.
Danger was talking about the scientific method.
 
\(1+frac{1}{n})^n=sum_{n=0}^{\n}\frac{\n!}{\(n-k)!\k!}
 
  • #10
\(1+frac{1}{n})^n
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K