I Make a list of all irreducible polynomials of degrees 1 to 5 over F2

Hill
Messages
735
Reaction score
576
TL;DR
F2 = (0, 1)
To this exercise,
1735996974647.png

the textbook's solution is
1735997016225.png

I didn't follow their method and have found another degree 5 solution, ##X^5+X^4+X^2+X+1##.
Is it wrong or the book has omitted this solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hill said:
TL;DR Summary: F2 = (0, 1)

To this exercise,
View attachment 355323
the textbook's solution is
View attachment 355324
I didn't follow their method and have found another degree 5 solution, ##X^5+X^4+X^2+X+1##.
Is it wrong or the book has omitted this solution?
It is irreducible. I guess they missed it.
 
martinbn said:
It is irreducible. I guess they missed it.
As well as
##X^5+X^4+X^3+X+1##
##X^5+X^3+X^2+X+1##
##X^5+X^4+X^3+X^2+1##
(?)
 
Hill said:
As well as
##X^5+X^4+X^3+X+1##
##X^5+X^3+X^2+X+1##
##X^5+X^4+X^3+X^2+1##
(?)
Yes.
There are six of them.
 
This seems a little easier than the book's hints make it. A poly. over Z/2 is divisible by X or X+1 iff it either ends in X or has an even number of terms, hence the irreducible cubics end in 1 and have an odd number of terms, i.e. X^3+X^2 + 1, and X^3+X+1. A reducible quartic or quintic either ends in X or has an even number of terms or is divisible by X^2+X+1....It is still somewhat tedious, but maybe not as long as multiplying together all those factors to compute all reducible examples. It is interesting that after all these years I still have trouble checking irreducibility. I guess it is just inherently difficult. Such problems have been challenging for years in algebraic geometry: Severi's conjecture, irreducibility of moduli of curves, components of Hilbert schemes,....
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
823
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K