Make an operator to be hermitian

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter masoodsa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Operator
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
masoodsa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have an operator which isnot Hermitian is there any way to make it hermitian ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any operator can be written of the form H = A + iB where A and B are Hermitian.

In fact one could base QM on any operator using that result via the obvious extension to the Born Rule E(H) = E(A) + i E(B)

Interestingly in proving the Born rule via Gleason that's what one does.

So why does one stick with Hermitan operators? The reason is the properties of continuous transformations between states and symmetry. Wigners Theroem implies such must be Unitary:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner's_theorem

If U is such a transformation dependent on t (not necessarily time) and we consider Δt small. U(Δt) = 1 + D Δt. UU(bar) = 1 + DΔt + D(bar)Δt = 1 or D = -D(bar) which means D is pure imaginary. If we want to associate D with an observation, which from symmetry considerations you want to do because it leads to the same equations as classical physics (see Ballentine chapter 3), then its expectation would be imaginary as well which would be a rather strange thing. So what we do is define divide D by i and use that operator which is of course real.

Thanks
Bill