MHB Making up an Equation That Satisfies Given Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joystar77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
AI Thread Summary
An equation that satisfies the conditions of having x-intercepts at (-1, 0) and (2, 0) and a y-intercept at (0, 4) can be expressed as y = k(x - 2)(x + 1). To determine the value of k, substitute y = 4 and x = 0 into the equation. This allows for solving k to ensure the equation meets the specified intercepts. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly factoring in the y-intercept when forming the equation. Ultimately, the approach leads to a valid quadratic equation that meets all given conditions.
Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Make up an equation that satisfies the given conditions: must have x-intercepts at (-1, 0) and (2, 0). It must also have a y-intercept at (0, 4).

Is it correct to say that the equation with x-intercepts would look like this:

y = (x - 2) (x + 1)How do you factor the y-intercept?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Making up an Equation Satisfies Given Conditions

Joystar1977 said:
Make up an equation that satisfies the given conditions: must have x-intercepts at (-1, 0) and (2, 0). It must also have a y-intercept at (0, 4).

Is it correct to say that the equation with x-intercepts would look like this:

y = (x - 2) (x + 1)How do you factor the y-intercept?

You are definitely on the right track. I would use the form:

$$y=k(x-2)(x+1)$$

Now let $y=4$ and $x=0$ and solve for $k$. :D
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top