Manipulating derivatives and rearranging

  • Thread starter Thread starter cooev769
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Click For Summary
A third-year physics student in New Zealand is struggling to rearrange two equations related to angular momentum and torque. The goal is to express the angular velocity in terms of radius and other variables, but the student finds their derivative skills lacking. Assistance is requested for both the mathematical rearrangement and for learning how to properly typeset equations on the forum. A tutorial on typesetting equations is mentioned, but the student later discovers that the equations provided for derivation were incorrect, leading to the closure of the thread. The discussion highlights the challenges of mastering fundamental concepts in physics education.
cooev769
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hey, I am actually a third year physics student, but here in New Zealand they tend to rush past the fundamentals, hence I can't seem to rearrange the following equations properly. Eq 1 and Eq 2 are:

τ=-erB*dr/dt ek

and

τ=m*d(r^2dθ/dt)/dt ek

Where ek is a unit vector. Is supposed to be rearranged to the form:

vθ(r) = (-eB/mr) * integral between r and a of r dr = (-eB/mr)*(r^2-a^2)/2

I can get very close but my derivative rearranging is sub-optimum. A little help would be really appreciated, as would telling me how the hell I write equations on the forum. Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Regarding how to typeset equations on PF, there's a nice tutorial in section 2 of the FAQ, which should be more prominently visible but can be found under the "Site Info" link at the top of the page.
 
jbunniii said:
I linked it in my post too (see blue FAQ link) but now that I look at it, it doesn't show up very well. :biggrin:

I totally missed that... Perhaps I'm going blind :cry:
 
Cheers. Turns out the equations they gave us to derive was incorrect. So thread closed.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
959
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K