Manometer with non linear height change.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on establishing a mathematical relationship between heights h1 and h2 in a triangular manometer configuration, influenced by pressure changes (p1). The user seeks a formula to calculate these heights based on a defined base length and angle theta of the triangle. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a cleaner method to express h1 and h2 in terms of the height difference (Δh) for various manometer geometries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles, particularly hydrostatic pressure.
  • Familiarity with manometer design and its geometric configurations.
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometry, specifically relating to triangles.
  • Proficiency in mathematical modeling and equation manipulation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of hydrostatic pressure in non-linear manometer systems.
  • Explore trigonometric relationships in triangular geometries for fluid measurement.
  • Investigate mathematical modeling techniques for pressure-height relationships.
  • Learn about advanced fluid dynamics simulations to analyze various manometer designs.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students involved in fluid mechanics, particularly those working with manometer designs and pressure measurement systems.

buildingblocs
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
I am trying to establish a mathematical relationship between heights h1 and h2 (please refer to figure attached) for a manometer whose RHS channel is the shape of a triangle (defined by a base length and the angle theta). I want to be able to calculate the heights h1 and h2 for a given change to the pressure p1. Any help or a point in the right direction would be much appreciated.

Regards,

ps. This is not an practice question, I am hoping to do this with multiple manometer with various geometries.
 

Attachments

  • ZOE_0037.jpg
    ZOE_0037.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 567
Engineering news on Phys.org
ZOE_0039[1].jpg


here is my attempt to get h1 or h2 interms of Δh. Anyone know a cleaner way in doing so?
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K