Marissa043's question on another forum regarding a Cesàro limit

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Opalg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the sequence \( \lim_{n\to\infty} a_n = p \), then the Cesàro limit \( \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n}{n} = p \). The proof involves transforming the sequence by substituting \( a_n \) with \( a_n - p \) to simplify the case to \( p = 0 \). By employing the epsilon-delta definition of limits and analyzing the average of the sequence, it is established that the Cesàro mean converges to zero as \( n \) approaches infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic knowledge of sequences and series
  • Concept of Cesàro means in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cesàro summation
  • Learn about convergence of sequences and series in real analysis
  • Explore the application of the epsilon-delta definition in proofs
  • Investigate related theorems such as Stolz-Cesàro theorem
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on real analysis, limit theorems, and sequence convergence. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Cesàro limits and their proofs.

Opalg
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
13
Here is the question:
Prove that if $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n = p$ then $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}(a_1+a_2+\ldots +a_n)/n = p$.
Here is a link to the question:

Prove this limit.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hallo Marissa043!

Replacing $a_n$ by $a_n - p$ (for all $n$), you reduce the problem to the case where $p=0$. Now you have to do some real analysis, with an epsilon.So let $\varepsilon>0$. Since $\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n = 0$, there exists $N$ such that $|a_n|<\varepsilon$ whenever $n>N$. Let $s_n = (a_1+a_2+\ldots +a_n)/n$. The idea of the proof is to look at $s_n$, where $n$ is much larger than $N$, by splitting the sum up into the terms from $1$ to $N$ and then from $N+1$ to $n$. In fact, $$|s_n| = \frac1n\biggl|\sum_{k=1}^na_k\biggr| \leqslant \frac1n\biggl|\sum_{k=1}^Na_k\biggr| + \frac1n\biggl|\sum_{k=N+1}^na_k\biggr| \leqslant \frac1n\biggl|\sum_{k=1}^Na_k\biggr| + \frac{\varepsilon(n-N)}n.$$ By taking $n$ large enough, we can make $\frac1n\Bigl|\sum_{k=1}^Na_k\Bigr|$ less than $\varepsilon$, so that $|s_n| < \varepsilon + \frac{\varepsilon(n-N)}n < 2\varepsilon$. Hence $s_n\to0$ as $n\to\infty$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K