Mass conservation charged dust

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of mass in a system of charged dust particles within a specific space-time framework, characterized by the energy-momentum tensors for both the charged dust and the electromagnetic field. The energy-momentum tensor for charged dust is defined as ##T^{\text{charges}}_{ab} = \rho \xi_a \xi_b##, while the electromagnetic contribution is given by ##T^{\text{EM}}_{ab} = F_{ac}F_{b}{}{}^{c} - \frac{1}{4}g_{ab}F^{cd}F_{cd}##. The authors assert that the total energy-momentum tensor satisfies the conservation law ##\nabla^a T_{ab} = 0##, contingent upon the assumptions of Lorentz force law compliance and mass current conservation. The conversation also touches on the implications of electromagnetic interactions on the motion of dust particles and the necessity of a mean-field approximation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy-momentum tensors in general relativity
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz force law and its application to charged particles
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field theory and its interaction with matter
  • Concepts of mass current conservation in relativistic frameworks
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of mass current conservation in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of electromagnetic fields on particle dynamics in relativistic contexts
  • Investigate the Vlasov equation and its applications to charged dust systems
  • Examine the role of mean-field approximations in modeling interacting particle systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in general relativity, electromagnetism, and plasma physics, will benefit from this discussion, as it addresses the complexities of mass conservation in charged particle systems.

  • #31
WannabeNewton said:
Wald doesn't go into mass-current conservation unfortunately but it's ok. I asked Geroch about the issue and he said that it is indeed a problem as stated but that it can be easily fixed by taking the limit as the width of the tube goes to zero, in which case the error due to lack of local hypersurface orthogonality also goes to zero.

If you need anything else about congruences clarified, let me know.

[ limits to the rescue :) ]

So you emailed him? Cool.

I don't think I need anything else right now, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K