Mass defect and binding energy help

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of mass defect and binding energy in nuclear physics, particularly in the context of nuclear reactions such as fusion and fission. Participants explore the relationship between mass defect, binding energy, and the energy released during these processes, as well as the role of the strong nuclear force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the origins of binding energy and its relation to mass defect, questioning whether mass is converted into strong nuclear force.
  • It is proposed that energy is liberated when nucleons merge, leading to a reduction in total energy and mass of the system.
  • Participants discuss the role of gravitational potential energy in nuclear reactions, with some suggesting it is irrelevant compared to the strong nuclear force.
  • There is a suggestion that increasing binding energy per nucleon is a method to release energy in nuclear reactions, but the exact mechanisms are debated.
  • Some participants assert that the strong nuclear force is the primary cause of binding energies, while others question this interpretation.
  • The emission of gamma rays during the formation of deuterons is discussed, with questions raised about the connection to nucleons settling into a lower energy state.
  • Confusion remains regarding the relationship between binding energy, mass defect, and energy release in nuclear processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on several key points, including the nature of the relationship between mass defect and binding energy, the role of the strong nuclear force, and the mechanisms of energy release in nuclear reactions. Multiple competing views are present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions and uncertainties regarding the definitions and implications of mass defect and binding energy. Some statements rely on specific interpretations of nuclear forces and energy states that are not universally agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of nuclear physics, particularly those seeking to understand the complexities of binding energy, mass defect, and the underlying forces in nuclear reactions.

|mathematix|
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
I don't know if I completely understand mass defect and binding energy so I will write what I understand and hopefully you can explain any misunderstandings I have.

I know what mass defect is and that I understand that we need the strong nuclear force to keep the nucleus together etc. but I don't understand where binding energy comes from.

So if we have a proton and a neutron and we bring them together to form a deuterium atom, will some of the mass of each become converted into strong nuclear force to keep them together? Where does the energy liberated come from then? Shouldn't there be energy liberated when two nuclei are fused together? Also, can you explain the effect of gravitational potential energy? Is the decrease in GPE the reason why energy is liberated?

So basically, where does the energy of mass defect go (becomes strong force?) and where does the energy of fusion reactions come from?

If we want to separate a nucleus into its constituents, we have to provide energy equivalent to mass defect, correct? According to E=mc^2, the energy put into the system to separate nucleons is transformed into mass, making the final particles heavier (their actual mass). This creates and is equivalent to the mass defect.

Or does nuclear energy come from either splitting high-mass nuclei or fusing lighter nuclei as this increases the binding energy per nucleon?

Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: connorp
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot "convert a mass into a force". The nucleons attract each other, if they merge they release energy, the total energy (in the rest frame) of the system reduces, therefore the mass reduces.
Shouldn't there be energy liberated when two nuclei are fused together?
It is.
Also, can you explain the effect of gravitational potential energy? Is the decrease in GPE the reason why energy is liberated?
You can have the same effect with gravity (collapsing stars, ...). For nuclei, gravity is irrelevant, however.
If we want to separate a nucleus into its constituents, we have to provide energy equivalent to mass defect, correct?
Right
Or does nuclear energy come from either splitting high-mass nuclei or fusing lighter nuclei as this increases the binding energy per nucleon?
Those are methods to release energy (by producing nuclei with more binding energy).
 
mfb said:
Those are methods to release energy (by producing nuclei with more binding energy).

So nuclear force always exists between any two nucleons and when nucleons come together to create a nucleus, mass defect provides the binding energy, so nuclear force has nothing to do with energy released in nuclear reactions (bombs, etc.). Increasing binding energy causes the liberation of energy in nuclear reactions.

Thank you!
 
So nuclear force always exists between any two nucleons
Its range is very short.
so nuclear force has nothing to do with energy released in nuclear reactions (bombs, etc.)
How did you get that impression? The strong force is the (main) cause for nuclear binding energies, and nuclear bombs just release energy based on the binding energy differences of different nuclei.
 
mfb said:
Its range is very short.
How did you get that impression? The strong force is the (main) cause for nuclear binding energies, and nuclear bombs just release energy based on the binding energy differences of different nuclei.

I didn't use the right words to say what I mean :( I meant to say that when the binding energy per nucleon is increases, energy is liberated (which is ultimately due to nuclear strong force).
 
|mathematix| said:
So nuclear force always exists between any two nucleons and when nucleons come together to create a nucleus, mass defect provides the binding energy, so nuclear force has nothing to do with energy released in nuclear reactions (bombs, etc.). Increasing binding energy causes the liberation of energy in nuclear reactions.

Thank you!
This is a bit confusing. But nuclear force always exists among nucleons in a nucleus.

The energy required to break down a nucleus into its component nucleons is called the nuclear binding energy.
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Nuclear/nuclear_binding_energy.htm#Top

The mass defect is merely a measure of the binding energy required to remove a nucleon, or nucleons from a nucleus, or if enough energy could be applied, to dissociate a nucleus into it's constituent components. The mass defect is a manifestation of the nucleons settling into a lower energy state, somewhat analogous to atoms forming molecules.

The binding energy may be expressed in the form of a gamma ray, or kinetic energy of nuclei, which is the case with most fusion reactions or all fission reactions. In fission, the two nuclei (fission products) are in a tighter bound state (greater binding energy per nucleon) that the nucleus that fissioned. Note that 2 or 3 neutrons are also released in the fission process, as are gamma rays in some cases.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/nucbin.html

Deuterons can be formed by a proton and neutron combining, in which case a gamma ray is emitted with an energy equivalent to the binding energy, or by pp fusion, in which a positron and neutrino are emitted.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/procyc.html#c4
 
Astronuc said:
This is a bit confusing. But nuclear force always exists among nucleons in a nucleus.

The energy required to break down a nucleus into its component nucleons is called the nuclear binding energy.
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Nuclear/nuclear_binding_energy.htm#Top

The mass defect is merely a measure of the binding energy required to remove a nucleon, or nucleons from a nucleus, or if enough energy could be applied, to dissociate a nucleus into it's constituent components. The mass defect is a manifestation of the nucleons settling into a lower energy state, somewhat analogous to atoms forming molecules.

The binding energy may be expressed in the form of a gamma ray, or kinetic energy of nuclei, which is the case with most fusion reactions or all fission reactions. In fission, the two nuclei (fission products) are in a tighter bound state (greater binding energy per nucleon) that the nucleus that fissioned. Note that 2 or 3 neutrons are also released in the fission process, as are gamma rays in some cases.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/nucbin.html

Deuterons can be formed by a proton and neutron combining, in which case a gamma ray is emitted with an energy equivalent to the binding energy, or by pp fusion, in which a positron and neutrino are emitted.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/procyc.html#c4

Thank you! I think I understand all of it except the last part :(

"Deuterons can be formed by a proton and neutron combining, in which case a gamma ray is emitted" why are gamma rays emitted? Does this have to do with the nucleons going to a 'lower energy state' and thus releasing energy?
 
|mathematix| said:
Thank you! I think I understand all of it except the last part :(

"Deuterons can be formed by a proton and neutron combining, in which case a gamma ray is emitted" why are gamma rays emitted? Does this have to do with the nucleons going to a 'lower energy state' and thus releasing energy?
Neutron capture by a nucleus is usually associated with gamma emission. The reaction is referred to as (n,γ). When a nucleus absorbs a neutron, it changes the nuclear configuration (A -> A+1), and the mass of nucleus is less than the mass of the initial nucleus and free neutron.

Bascially it has to do with the nucleons forming a more bounded state as compared to the free nucleons.

Upon neutron absorption, some nuclei form metastable states, which decay by isomeric transition, i.e., gamma emission. This is related to nucleon spin.
http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/469/1/fulltext.pdf
 
  • #10
I was under the impression that when a particle passes the Coulomb barrier, it releases it's binding energy and enters the nucleus. The mass defect is the summation of the released binding energies of the nucleons in an atom. For instance the mass defect is the difference in mass between an isotope and the sum of the mass of the nucleons in the atom. Is that right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K