Mass, Energy & Inertia: Impact of Trapping Energy in a Box

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mokeejoe5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    energy inertia mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between trapped energy, mass, and inertia, concluding that trapping energy in a box increases the system's inertia, making it more difficult to accelerate. Participants emphasize that mass can be viewed as concentrated energy within a confined volume. The conversation highlights the importance of kinetic energy in determining the work required to move an object, particularly when comparing the kinetic energy of hot versus cold objects. The discussion also references the need to consider relativistic kinetic energy for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and its calculations
  • Familiarity with the concept of inertia in physics
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and molecular motion
  • Awareness of relativistic physics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of mass-energy equivalence in detail
  • Learn about relativistic kinetic energy calculations
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on molecular motion and inertia
  • Study the principles of potential energy in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineering students, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of energy, mass, and inertia in physical systems.

mokeejoe5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
If you trap a lot of energy in a box does the system (box plus its contents) gain inertia and become more difficult to accelerate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So there's nothing special about mass then? its just concentrated energy in a small volume?
 
How did you trap all that energy in the box?
 
Dr.D said:
How did you trap all that energy in the box?
Gyroscope!
 
mtworkowski@o said:
Gyroscope!
Well, I have to admit, that makes as much sense as the original proposition.
 
Dr.D said:
How did you trap all that energy in the box?
grimage-jack-in-the-box.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
A.T. said:
grimage-jack-in-the-box.png
I knew you would like it. Kinetic energy raising inertia and causing the box to behave differently than if it were stationary.
 
  • #10
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.
 
  • #11
Khashishi said:
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.
I used to cut allot of classes. I'm sure i missed that one!
 
  • #12
Khashishi said:
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.
What does this have to do with an increase in inertia? How does it apply to energy stored in a spring?
 
  • #13
I second that question: What does this have to do with an increase in inertia?
 
  • #14
Khashishi said:
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.

Yeah, i missed the logic on that one. But that happens sometimes.
 
  • #15
Perhaps it would be an idea to define what you mean by "inertia' in this context.
 
  • #16
I skipped a couple steps, and hoped everyone would still be able to follow. Let me elaborate some more.

The work it takes to move an object is equal to the difference in kinetic energy between the object at rest and the object in motion.
##W = T_f - T_i##
##F = dW/dx = dT/dx##
We can define a "mass" for the composite object using
##F = ma##
so
##m = \frac{dT/dx}{a}##
##m \propto \Delta T/\Delta v##

When you heat an object, the molecules gain vibrational energy. It takes more work to move a box of hot molecules than a box of cold ones. Let's simplify the composite object as much as is possible: it is composed of two atoms. When the atoms vibrate, they move in opposite directions so the total center of mass doesn't move. The kinetic energy of the object is simply the sum of the kinetic energy of the atoms, and any kinetic energy of any fields in the object (which we will assume to be zero).
Calculate the change in kinetic energy when you move the center of mass of the object. Do this for the cold object, and the hot object, and see which takes more work. The work it takes to move the object is proportional to the mass of the composite object.
 
  • #17
mtworkowski@o said:
I knew you would like it. Kinetic energy raising inertia and causing the box to behave differently than if it were stationary.
The jack in the box has potential energy (in the compressed spring), that increases inertia.
 
  • #18
Khashishi said:
Calculate the change in kinetic energy when you move the center of mass of the object. Do this for the cold object, and the hot object,
I did. The change in kinetic energy is the same.
 
  • #19
Oh, you need to use the relativistic kinetic energy. Sorry about that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K