Mass equivalence and instantaneous gravitational field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravitational fields in the context of general relativity (GR), particularly examining a scenario involving a train collision. Participants explore the implications of viewing gravitational fields from different reference frames and the observable effects of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Max Born's explanation of a train collision, suggesting that a strong gravitational field appears during the event, which diminishes as wreckage comes to rest.
  • Others argue that in GR, the gravitational field is not observable, as a free-falling observer cannot detect it, and that attributing an independent existence to the gravitational field leads to violations of causality.
  • One participant notes that the presence of a gravitational field depends on the chosen coordinate system, with the field being present when the train is at rest but absent when the Earth is at rest.
  • Another participant contends that GR is fundamentally a field theory, asserting that gravity is indeed a field similar to electromagnetism, and questions the interpretation of gravitational fields in GR literature.
  • Some participants discuss the distinction between the gravitational field as a physical entity and the characteristics of spacetime influenced by gravity, suggesting that the term "gravitational field" may be used loosely in some contexts.
  • There is a suggestion that the instantaneous change in spacetime due to events like the train wreck raises questions about causation and the nature of gravitational influence across the universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and observability of gravitational fields in GR. Some assert that gravitational fields are integral to the theory, while others challenge this notion, leading to an unresolved debate on the interpretation of gravitational phenomena.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining gravitational fields in GR, with references to tensors and the mathematical framework of the theory. There is an acknowledgment of the limitations in understanding the implications of gravitational fields and their observability.

  • #31
GregAshmore said:
Relativity is a tough subject, both conceptually and mathematically.

It's also a very beautiful subject, and fundamentally a simple one. Make sure to post on PF whenever you run into snags!
 

Similar threads

High School What is the distinction between the Weak and Strong Equivalence Principles?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Weak principle of equivalence (Galileo, Newton)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Graduate Can gravitational energy be localized in the case of plane waves?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Is momentum conserved as a body falls through a gravitational field?
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Graduate Time Dilation in Gravitational Fields: Are Equivalent Formulas?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
High School Does gravitational force act on system or its components?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad How Does the Einstein Equivalence Principle Explain Energy Source Curvature?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Clock hypothesis, gravity time dilation and Equivalence Principle
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
High School Bending of light in a gravitational field
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Undergrad Falling EM system contradicts the equivalence principle?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K